Kristofer R Covey1,2, J Patrick Megonigal3. 1. Environmental Studies and Sciences Program, Skidmore College, 815 N Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY, 12866, USA. 2. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 195 Prospect St., New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. 3. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD, 21037, USA.
Abstract
Contents Summary 35 I. Introduction 36 II. Tree CH4 fluxes 36 III. Tree emissions of soil-produced CH4 40 IV. Tree-produced CH4 42 V. Trees in forest CH4 budgets 44 VI. Conclusions 46 Acknowledgements 48 Author contributions 48 References 48 SUMMARY: Forest ecosystem methane (CH4 ) research has focused on soils, but trees are also important sources and sinks in forest CH4 budgets. Living and dead trees transport and emit CH4 produced in soils; living trees and dead wood emit CH4 produced inside trees by microorganisms; and trees produce CH4 through an abiotic photochemical process. Here, we review the state of the science on the production, consumption, transport, and emission of CH4 by living and dead trees, and the spatial and temporal dynamics of these processes across hydrologic gradients inclusive of wetland and upland ecosystems. Emerging research demonstrates that tree CH4 emissions can significantly increase the source strength of wetland forests, and modestly decrease the sink strength of upland forests. Scaling from stem or leaf measurements to trees or forests is limited by knowledge of the mechanisms by which trees transport soil-produced CH4 , microbial processes produce and oxidize CH4 inside trees, a lack of mechanistic models, the diffuse nature of forest CH4 fluxes, complex overlap between sources and sinks, and extreme variation across individuals. Understanding the complex processes that regulate CH4 source-sink dynamics in trees and forests requires cross-disciplinary research and new conceptual models that transcend the traditional binary classification of wetland vs upland forest. No claim to original US government works New Phytologist
Contents Summary 35 I. Introduction 36 II. Tree CH4 fluxes 36 III. Tree emissions of soil-produced CH4 40 IV. Tree-produced CH4 42 V. Trees in forest CH4 budgets 44 VI. Conclusions 46 Acknowledgements 48 Author contributions 48 References 48 SUMMARY: Forest ecosystem methane (CH4 ) research has focused on soils, but trees are also important sources and sinks in forest CH4 budgets. Living and dead trees transport and emit CH4 produced in soils; living trees and dead wood emit CH4 produced inside trees by microorganisms; and trees produce CH4 through an abiotic photochemical process. Here, we review the state of the science on the production, consumption, transport, and emission of CH4 by living and dead trees, and the spatial and temporal dynamics of these processes across hydrologic gradients inclusive of wetland and upland ecosystems. Emerging research demonstrates that tree CH4 emissions can significantly increase the source strength of wetland forests, and modestly decrease the sink strength of upland forests. Scaling from stem or leaf measurements to trees or forests is limited by knowledge of the mechanisms by which trees transport soil-produced CH4 , microbial processes produce and oxidize CH4 inside trees, a lack of mechanistic models, the diffuse nature of forest CH4 fluxes, complex overlap between sources and sinks, and extreme variation across individuals. Understanding the complex processes that regulate CH4 source-sink dynamics in trees and forests requires cross-disciplinary research and new conceptual models that transcend the traditional binary classification of wetland vs upland forest. No claim to original US government works New Phytologist
Authors: Luke C Jeffrey; Damien T Maher; Eleonora Chiri; Pok Man Leung; Philipp A Nauer; Stefan K Arndt; Douglas R Tait; Chris Greening; Scott G Johnston Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Salla A M Tenhovirta; Lukas Kohl; Markku Koskinen; Marjo Patama; Anna Lintunen; Alessandro Zanetti; Rauna Lilja; Mari Pihlatie Journal: New Phytol Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 10.323
Authors: Sofie Sjögersten; Andy Siegenthaler; Omar R Lopez; Paul Aplin; Benjamin Turner; Vincent Gauci Journal: New Phytol Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 10.151