Baogan Peng1, Nikolai Bogduk2. 1. Department of Spinal Surgery, Institute of Spinal Surgery of Armed Police Force, General Hospital of Armed Police Force, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND: Objectives To determine the extent and strength of evidence that supports the belief that cervical intervertebral discs are a source of neck pain. DESIGN: Design The evidence from anatomical, laboratory, experimental, diagnostic, and treatment studies was summarized and analyzed for concept validity, face validity, content validity, and construct validity. RESULTS: Results Evidence from basic sciences shows that cervical discs have a nociceptive innervation, and experimental studies show that they are capable of producing neck pain. Disc stimulation has been developed as a diagnostic test but has rarely been used in a disciplined fashion. The prevalence of cervical disc pain has not been properly established but appears to be low. No treatment has been established that reliably achieves complete relief of neck pain in substantial proportions of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions Basic science evidence supports the concept of cervical disc pain, but epidemiologic and clinical evidence to vindicate the clinical application of the concept is poor or lacking.
OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND: Objectives To determine the extent and strength of evidence that supports the belief that cervical intervertebral discs are a source of neck pain. DESIGN: Design The evidence from anatomical, laboratory, experimental, diagnostic, and treatment studies was summarized and analyzed for concept validity, face validity, content validity, and construct validity. RESULTS: Results Evidence from basic sciences shows that cervical discs have a nociceptive innervation, and experimental studies show that they are capable of producing neck pain. Disc stimulation has been developed as a diagnostic test but has rarely been used in a disciplined fashion. The prevalence of cervical disc pain has not been properly established but appears to be low. No treatment has been established that reliably achieves complete relief of neck pain in substantial proportions of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions Basic science evidence supports the concept of cervical disc pain, but epidemiologic and clinical evidence to vindicate the clinical application of the concept is poor or lacking.
Authors: Tina Stegmann; Hanno Steinke; Philipp Pieroh; Faramarz Dehghani; Anna Völker; Mathias Jakob Groll; Thomas Wolfskämpf; Michael Werner; Julia Kollan; Andreas Hinz; Mario Leimert Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 1.246