Borek Foldyna1, James E Udelson2, Júlia Karády1,3, Dahlia Banerji1, Michael T Lu1, Thomas Mayrhofer1,4, Daniel O Bittner1,5, Nandini M Meyersohn1, Hamed Emami1, Tessa S S Genders6, Christopher B Fordyce7, Maros Ferencik1,8, Pamela S Douglas6, Udo Hoffmann1. 1. Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 400, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Tufts University School of Medicine and the Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street North, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 68 Varosmajor Street, Budapest, Hungary. 4. School of Business Studies, Stralsund University of Applied Sciences, Zur Schwedenschanze 15, Stralsund, Germany. 5. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximilianspl. 2, Erlangen, Germany. 6. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 2400 Pratt Street, Durham, NC, USA. 7. Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 8. Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To update pretest probabilities (PTP) for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD ≥ 50%) across age, sex, and clinical symptom strata, using coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in a large contemporary population of patients with stable chest pain referred to non-invasive testing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included patients enrolled in the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial and randomized to CTA. Exclusively level III-certified readers, blinded to demographic and clinical data, assessed the prevalence of CAD ≥ 50% in a central core lab. After comparing the recent European Society of Cardiology-Diamond and Forrester PTP (ESC-DF) with the actual observed prevalence of CAD ≥ 50%, we created a new PTP set by replacing the ESC-DF PTP with the observed prevalence of CAD ≥ 50% across strata of age, sex, and type of angina. In 4415 patients (48.3% men; 60.5 ± 8.2 years; 78% atypical angina; 11% typical angina; 11% non-anginal chest pain), the observed prevalence of CAD ≥ 50% was 13.9%, only one-third of the average ESC-DF PTP (40.6; P < 0.001 for difference). The PTP in the new set ranged 2-48% and were consistently lower than the ESC-DF PTP across all age, sex, and angina type categories. Initially, 4284/4415 (97%) patients were classified as intermediate-probability by the ESC-DF (PTP 15-85%); using the PROMISE-PTP, 50.2% of these patients were reclassified to the low PTP category (PTP < 15%). CONCLUSION: The ESC-DF PTP overestimate vastly the actual prevalence of CAD ≥ 50%. A new set of PTP, derived from results of non-invasive testing, may substantially reduce the need for non-invasive tests in stable chest pain. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To update pretest probabilities (PTP) for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD ≥ 50%) across age, sex, and clinical symptom strata, using coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in a large contemporary population of patients with stable chest pain referred to non-invasive testing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included patients enrolled in the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial and randomized to CTA. Exclusively level III-certified readers, blinded to demographic and clinical data, assessed the prevalence of CAD ≥ 50% in a central core lab. After comparing the recent European Society of Cardiology-Diamond and Forrester PTP (ESC-DF) with the actual observed prevalence of CAD ≥ 50%, we created a new PTP set by replacing the ESC-DF PTP with the observed prevalence of CAD ≥ 50% across strata of age, sex, and type of angina. In 4415 patients (48.3% men; 60.5 ± 8.2 years; 78% atypical angina; 11% typical angina; 11% non-anginal chest pain), the observed prevalence of CAD ≥ 50% was 13.9%, only one-third of the average ESC-DF PTP (40.6; P < 0.001 for difference). The PTP in the new set ranged 2-48% and were consistently lower than the ESC-DF PTP across all age, sex, and angina type categories. Initially, 4284/4415 (97%) patients were classified as intermediate-probability by the ESC-DF (PTP 15-85%); using the PROMISE-PTP, 50.2% of these patients were reclassified to the low PTP category (PTP < 15%). CONCLUSION: The ESC-DF PTP overestimate vastly the actual prevalence of CAD ≥ 50%. A new set of PTP, derived from results of non-invasive testing, may substantially reduce the need for non-invasive tests in stable chest pain. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Jiang Lu; Vera Bittner; Michelle F Magee; Neuza Lopes; Dale S Adler; Kevin E Kip; Leonard Schwartz; Yolanda A Groenewoud; Alice K Jacobs Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gilles Montalescot; Udo Sechtem; Stephan Achenbach; Felicita Andreotti; Chris Arden; Andrzej Budaj; Raffaele Bugiardini; Filippo Crea; Thomas Cuisset; Carlo Di Mario; J Rafael Ferreira; Bernard J Gersh; Anselm K Gitt; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Nikolaus Marx; Lionel H Opie; Matthias Pfisterer; Eva Prescott; Frank Ruschitzka; Manel Sabaté; Roxy Senior; David Paul Taggart; Ernst E van der Wall; Christiaan J M Vrints; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Juhani Knuuti; Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Marc J Claeys; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Cetin Erol; Herbert Frank; Christian Funck-Brentano; Oliver Gaemperli; José R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Michalis Hamilos; David Hasdai; Steen Husted; Stefan K James; Kari Kervinen; Philippe Kolh; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Massimo F Piepoli; Axel R Pries; Francesco Romeo; Lars Rydén; Maarten L Simoons; Per Anton Sirnes; Ph Gabriel Steg; Adam Timmis; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Aylin Yildirir; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Allen J Taylor; Manuel Cerqueira; John McB Hodgson; Daniel Mark; James Min; Patrick O'Gara; Geoffrey D Rubin Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2010-11-23
Authors: Michael J Wolk; Steven R Bailey; John U Doherty; Pamela S Douglas; Robert C Hendel; Christopher M Kramer; James K Min; Manesh R Patel; Lisa Rosenbaum; Leslee J Shaw; Raymond F Stainback; Joseph M Allen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Eric D Peterson; David Dai; J Matthew Brennan; Rita F Redberg; H Vernon Anderson; Ralph G Brindis; Pamela S Douglas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Victor Y Cheng; Daniel S Berman; Alan Rozanski; Allison M Dunning; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Augustin Delago; Millie Gomez; Martin Hadamitzky; Jörg Hausleiter; Ronald P Karlsberg; Philipp Kaufmann; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert L Raff; Todd C Villines; Leslee J Shaw; James K Min Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Sean W Hayes; James Min; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Earl S Ford; Umed A Ajani; Janet B Croft; Julia A Critchley; Darwin R Labarthe; Thomas E Kottke; Wayne H Giles; Simon Capewell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Borek Foldyna; Johannes Uhlig; Robin Gohmann; Christian Lücke; Thomas Mayrhofer; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Luigi Natale; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Joachim Lotz; Rodrigo Salgado; Marco Francone; Christian Loewe; Konstantin Nikolaou; Fabian Bamberg; David Maintz; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Holger Thiele; Udo Hoffmann; Matthias Gutberlet Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Jagat Narula; Y Chandrashekhar; Amir Ahmadi; Suhny Abbara; Daniel S Berman; Ron Blankstein; Jonathon Leipsic; David Newby; Edward D Nicol; Koen Nieman; Leslee Shaw; Todd C Villines; Michelle Williams; Harvey S Hecht Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2020-11-20
Authors: Zhen Sinead Wang; Jonathan Yap; Yi Ling Eileen Koh; Shaw Yang Chia; N Nivedita; Teck Wee Andrew Ang; Soo Chye Paul Goh; Cia Sin Lee; Lee Lim Joanna Tan; Chai Wah Ooi; Matthew Seow; Khung Keong Yeo; Siang Jin Terrance Chua; Ngiap Chuan Tan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Christopher B Fordyce; C Larry Hill; Daniel B Mark; Brooke Alhanti; Patricia A Pellikka; Udo Hoffmann; Manesh R Patel; Pamela S Douglas Journal: Heart Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 7.365