Literature DB >> 30519599

Data on the working population in Spain related to training, workplace conditions and accident rates.

M A Mariscal1, E M López-Perea1, S García-Herrero1, J R López-García1, S Herrera2.   

Abstract

Obtaining data on worker accident rates is necessary in order to analyze the causes and variables involved in the occurrence of said accidents. The majority of these data, collected after the accident occurs, do not consider the employee׳s working conditions. Here are presented the data on workplace accidents and the conditions of the workers by analyzing the generic data supplied as part of the 7th National Survey of Workplace Conditions (EWCS) in Spain, conducted in 2011. These data will yield the variables needed to determine if the information on workplace risks provided by the survey respondents has an appreciable effect on the occurrence of occupational accidents in the working population, and will also be used to explore other variables.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30519599      PMCID: PMC6260303          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of data The number of respondents was high. As a result, an analysis of the survey can be used to draw conclusions for a wide range of workers that reflect their situation in terms of their working conditions The dataset shows doctor visits for work-related health problems. This variable is not usually included in other studies and will allow researchers to observe its relationship with workplace accidents. The dataset includes the results of the training and information given to workers, which may allow for new studies to be carried out on these variables and their impact on the accident rate. The dataset provides information for future health and safety at work studies, with special interest for Health and Safety Technical Experts and medical professionals.

Data

The data were retrieved from the 7th National Survey of Workplace Conditions, study that is periodically conducted by the National Institute for Workplace Health and Safety to provide updated information on the conditions under which employees work in Spain [1]. The survey data were collected between 19 October 2011 and 21 February 2012. The respondents were aged 16 and older and represented every economic activity in every part of Spain, with the exception of Ceuta and Melilla. To collect the data, a total of 8892 workers were interviewed at their residences. The questionnaire contains 62 questions and is structured into the following thematic areas: work status and contract type, data on work center, type of work, physical agents, chemical and biological pollutants, safety conditions, design of the workplace, work load and psychosocial factors, prevention methods, work schedule, prevention activities, information and training, violent conduct in the workplace, health problems, personal information. Sample error – for a confidence level of 95.5% (two sigmas) and P = Q, the error for the sample group is ±1.06% [2]. It is important to note that the survey specialists subsequently applied the weighted coefficients shown in Table 1 to the data. These coefficients were intended to adjust the sample, based on the area of activity and the size of the workforce at the company, to the actual distribution of the occupational universe considered in the study and to more accurately reflect the real landscape of workers in Spain [2].
Table 1

Weighted coefficients.

1–1011–4950–249250 or more
Agriculture, livestock, forestry and fishing0.857052790.645125310.595275180.36505732
Chemical, sanitation and mining0.913698710.948617260.636613390.62436562
Metal1.133739861.012400320.918190920.82656415
Manufacturing industry0.782135720.946481950.788732610.57182255
Construction1.184221641.392392290.726686850.62392982
Commerce and repairs1.205678161.431392390.922790560.72015132
Hotels0.971916770.982034910.836122370.59999526
Transport and storage1.102755091.218498850.753896000.71646392
Communications, financial, scientific and administrative activities1.085671851.160458810.848986090.85295099
Public administration and education1.258805171.008972680.866276750.86878192
Healthcare and veterinary activities and social services1.144639201.101372590.815540431.05676891
Cultural and sports activities and personal services1.057018121.132547890.784598530.97477475
Weighted coefficients. The weighting factors were calculated based on data from the annual average of the 2011 Survey of the Working Population (EPA 2011). As a result, the data for the different variables will be presented both weighted and unweighted to clarify how the final (unweighted) data were obtained. These final data do not match those obtained from the National Workplace Health and Safety Institute through the National Observatory for Working Conditions [3]. The frequency tables that will be presented below, and that will provide a basis for later study, will be considered without this weighting factor, with each worker׳s answers being considered as individually relevant to our study. Many authors have considered working conditions from a standpoint associated with worker accident rates. The variables selected in this paper are deemed to be suitable for subsequent analysis. The contract type and accident rate are factors considered in the existing literature [4], [5], [6], [7]. Other aspects, such as the worker׳s experience and the area of activity, are recurring topics for various authors [8], [9], [10]. Lastly, the implementation of a safety culture in the company, based on aspects like the information and training given to employees to make them aware of the risks and safety measures in use in the workplace, has also been considered in previous studies [11], [12].

Experimental design, materials and methods

In this section, we consider the frequencies and categories associated with the selected variables, namely: contract type, work experience at the work center, information on the risks to the worker at his/her job, training received by the worker involving the prevention of risks on the job, accidents suffered in the previous two years, doctor visits for work-related health problems, area of activity of the work center.

Contract type

The data for this variable were obtained from questions Q-02 and Q-03 of the questionnaire. Question Q-02 determines if the worker is a salaried employee or belongs to another category related to self-employed, a cooperative, etc. (freelancers, other non-salaried category). For salaried workers, question Q-03 involves the type of contract. Excluded in this question are answers from workers classified as “not salaried” in Q-02. Table 2 shows the frequencies for each category in question Q-02. Table 3 shows the summarized frequencies for the subsequent analysis relating both questions.
Table 2

Question Q-02 on the NSWC.

Occupational statusNo. of answers
Grouped answers
Q-02WeightedUnweightedWeightedUnweighted
Salaried employee enrolled in Social Security (with contract)7062715770627157
Salaried employee not enrolled in Social Security (no contract)25825118301735
Independent freelancer with no salaried employees (business owner w/o employees)777728
Dependent freelancer with no salaried employees369347
Business owner with employees357335
Member of a cooperative3742
Helps in family business2727
Other55
Total8892889288928892
Table 3

Questions Q-02/Q-03 on the NSWC.

Occupational status/contract typeNo. of answers
Grouped answers
Q-02/Q-03WeightedUnweightedWeightedUnweighted
Permanent5220529370627157
Permanent seasonal412419
Per job or service915909
Temporary for production reasons272287
Temporary152156
In training2019
Intern1616
Temporary through an agency3740
Other1818
Not salaried (Q-02)18301735
Total7062715788928892
Question Q-02 on the NSWC. Questions Q-02/Q-03 on the NSWC.

Time on the job

These values correspond to the answers to Q-13 on the survey questionnaire. This variable is continuous and discrete, and ranges in value between 1 month and 52 years. The data from the survey are grouped into eight categories, and range from periods of less than 1 month to periods longer than 10 years. The data are shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Question Q-13 on the NSWC.

Time on the jobNo. of answers
Q-13 grouped by intervalsWeightedUnweighted
1 month229233
2–6 months553549
7 months to 1 year526515
1–3 years13321297
3–6 years16551654
6–10 years14381431
>10 years31343186
DK/NA2627
Total88928892
Question Q-13 on the NSWC.

Perception of the information on the risks involved in the job

The workers surveyed were asked to give their opinion on the quality/quantity of the information received in terms of the risk that their current job poses to their health and safety. This aspect is reflected in question 48 of the EWCS, the results of which are shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Question Q-48 on the NSWC.

Information on risksNo. of answers
Q-48WeightedUnweighted
Very well informed23812410
Well informed52795251
Not very well informed835837
Not informed at all288285
DK/NA109109
Total88928892
Question Q-48 on the NSWC. The question offers four categories, ranging from “very well informed” to “not informed at all”.

Training on safety and risks to health involved in the job

The presence or absence of training on the risks to the worker׳s health and safety posed by his/her job is the topic of question Q-49. It is asked as a Yes/No question, the results of which are presented in Table 6.
Table 6

Question Q-49 on the NSWC.

Training on risks/safetyNo. of answers
Q-49WeightedUnweighted
Yes50855171
No37003618
DK/NA106103
Total88928892
Question Q-49 on the NSWC.

Accidents reported in the previous two years

Variable that reflects if the worker reported having been in a work-related accident in the previous two years. This variable shows that 12 of the workers surveyed did not respond to this question, as a result of which these respondents were eliminated from the values for the remaining variables. The totals are shown in Table 7.
Table 7

Question Q-52 on the NSWC.

Accident reportedNo. of answers
Q-52WeightedUnweighted
Yes670686
No82108194
DK/NA1212
Total88928892
Question Q-52 on the NSWC.

Visited doctor due to work-related health problem

In question Q-54, workers are asked about health problems. This question is in turn divided into three questions with independent answers. Our study only uses the data from the third sub-question (Q-54-C), which relates these health problems to the performance of the work activity and to the statement of having visited the doctor as a result. The survey data determine the specific ailment affecting the worker (15 options), as reflected in Table 8, but we attempted to quantify how many of them visited a doctor independently of the problem indicated, by considering the binary (yes/no) variable. Moreover, a positive answer was counted as a single instance even if the respondent visited the doctor for more than one problem at once.
Table 8

Question Q-54-C on the NSWC.

Visited doctor for a health problemWeighted
Unweighted
Q-54-CYesNoYesno
Q54_C12476641624816411
Q54_C23897499538934999
Q54_C32063682920786814
Q54_C41649724316557237
Q54_C513187611348758
Q54_C628686062908602
Q54_C712987631308762
Q54_C821486782248668
Q54_C951083825148378
Q54_C1018287101848708
Q54_C1176681267618131
Q54_C1257783155828310
Q54_C131254763812547638
Q54_C1426286302618631
Q54_C151469742314707422
Question Q-54-C on the NSWC. The data for this question are shown in Table 9.
Table 9

Summary Q-54-C.

Visited doctor for a health problemUnweighted
Summary Q-54-CNo. of answers
Yes5274
No3618
Total8892
Summary Q-54-C.

Area of activity of the work center

Belonging to a specific production sector affects a worker׳s initial probability of contributing to the accident rate. This variable is defined in the survey by question Q-08, which applied the code in the 2009 National Classification of Economic Activities (CNAE) [13]. The question offers 87 activity categories considered in the 2009 CNAE. Since any process involving so many possibilities is ineffective, the data provided by the survey offer their own classification basis, with the answers grouped according to the four main areas of production: Agriculture. Industry. Construction. Services. The results are shown in Table 10.
Table 10

Question Q-08 on the NSWC.

Area of activityWeighted
Unweighted
Q-08 GroupedNo. of answersPercentNo. of answersPercent
Agriculture3524.0%4575.1%
Industry122213.7%144816.3%
Construction6917.8%5996.7%
Services662774.5%638871.8%
Total8892100.08892100.0
Question Q-08 on the NSWC.
Subject areaPopulation health
More specific subject areaOccupational risk prevention – Occupational health
Type of dataTables, figures and explanatory text
How data were acquiredSpanish Ministry of Labor and Social Security - http://encuestasnacionales.oect.es/
Data formatTables
Experimental factorsSurvey of 8892 workers in different production sectors in relation to their working conditions
Experimental featuresUse of different variables contained in the survey to study the relationship with the probability of workplace accidents
Data source locationSpain
Data accessibilityData are with this article.
  6 in total

1.  Well being, work environment and work accidents.

Authors:  A Kirschenbaum; L Oigenblick; A I Goldberg
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Temporary employment and health: a review.

Authors:  Marianna Virtanen; Mika Kivimäki; Matti Joensuu; Pekka Virtanen; Marko Elovainio; Jussi Vahtera
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Construction industry accidents in Spain.

Authors:  Miguel A Camino López; Dale O Ritzel; Ignacio Fontaneda; Oscar J González Alcantara
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2008-10-14

4.  Roles of age, length of service and job in work-related injury: a prospective study of 446 120 person-years in railway workers.

Authors:  N Chau; P Wild; D Dehaene; L Benamghar; J M Mur; C Touron
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Analysis of work related accidents in the Spanish mining sector from 1982-2006.

Authors:  Lluís Sanmiquel; Modesto Freijo; Joaquín Edo; Josep M Rossell
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2010-01-27

6.  Associations between temporary employment and occupational injury: what are the mechanisms?

Authors:  F G Benavides; J Benach; C Muntaner; G L Delclos; N Catot; M Amable
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.402

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.