| Literature DB >> 30519555 |
Jitendra Kumar Singh1, Rahul Kumar Sharma2, Pushpal Ghosh2, Ashwani Kumar1, Mohammed Latif Khan1.
Abstract
Water hyacinth (WH) is a troublesome aquatic weed of natural and artificial water bodies of India and other tropical countries and causing severe ecological problems. The WH biomass is low in lignin content and contains high amount of cellulose and hemicellulose, making it suitable material for conversion into liquid fuels for energy production. This study highlighted that, how different imidazolium based ionic liquids (ILs) [1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide, [Cnmim]Br (n = 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10)] with tunable properties can be employed for the degradation of WH biomass. Different characterizations techniques, such as XRD, FT-IR, SEM, and DSC are used to unravel the interplay between ILs and the biomass. In this study, it is observed that [Emim][Br] pretreated samples have maximum crystalline value (Crl = 26.38%) as compared to other ionic liquids pretreatments. FTIR data showed the removal of lignin from WH biomass by 12.77% for [Emim][Br] and 10.74% for [Edmim][Br]. SEM images have proven that [Emim][Br] pretreatment have altered the structure of biomass the most. Our results proved that IL pretreatment is a promising approach for effective treatment of WH biomass and causes high levels disruption of cellulose structure.Entities:
Keywords: crystallinity index; hydrolysis; ionic liquids; lignocellulosic biomass; pretreatment; water hyacinth
Year: 2018 PMID: 30519555 PMCID: PMC6258793 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1A general scheme of imidazolium based ionic liquids.
Types of as-prepared ionic liquids (ILs).
| 1 | 1-Ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium Bromide (IL1) | –C2H5 | –H | [Emim][Br] |
| 2 | 1-Ethyl-2,3-dimethyl imidazolium Bromide (IL2) | –C2H5 | –CH3 | [Edmim][Br] |
| 3 | 1-Butyl-3-methyl imidazolium Bromide (IL3) | –C4H9 | –H | [Bmim][Br] |
| 4 | 1-Hexyl-3-methyl imidazolium Bromide (IL4) | –C6H13 | –H | [Hmim][Br] |
| 5 | 1-Octyl-3-methyl imidazolium Bromide (IL5) | –C8H17 | –H | [Omim][Br] |
Figure 2FTIR spectra of untreated and pretreated water hyacinth (WH) biomass: (A) 3746 cm−1; (B) 3042 cm−1; (C) 2920 cm−1; (D) 2358 cm−1; (E) 1735 cm−1; (F) 1505 cm−1; (G) 1428 cm−1; (H) 1328 cm−1; (I) 897 cm−1.
Percentage relative changes in WH biomass after ionic liquids pretreatments (Tiwari et al., 2018).
| 3,332 | O–H stretching (indicate the hydrogen bonds breaking in cellulose) | 15.10 | 20.89 | 17.73 | 8.31 | −8.71 | |
| 2,906 | C–H stretching (breaking of methyl/ methylene group of cellulose) | 3.35 | 2.43 | 2.75 | 0.36 | 5.50 | |
| 2,359 | C–H methyl and methylene groups | 8.70 | 5.63 | 4.14 | −12.64 | −15.46 | |
| 1,730 | Carbonyl bonds (it is linked with removal of lignin side chain) | 2.26 | 1.62 | 1.34 | −2.98 | −5.85 | |
| 1,510 | C–C stretching (vibrations in the aromatic ring of lignin) | 2.61 | 1.91 | 1.71 | 1.42 | −5.46 | |
| 1,420 | CH2 scissoring at C(6) in cellulose | 1.09 | 0.97 | 0.35 | −4.91 | −8.83 | |
| 1,325 | C–H deformation in hemicellulose | 10.55 | 8.60 | 8.49 | 4.90 | −9.41 | |
| 1,058 | C–O stretch | 0.46 | 6.8 | 4.89 | 1.76 | −15.80 | |
| 897 | C–O–C valence (vibration of β-glycosidic link) | 4.82 | 3.51 | 1.55 | −0.88 | −7.12 | |
Relative change (%) = 100* (intensity of UT solids – intensity of pretreated solids)/intensity of UT solids; where positive value of % relative change indicates reduction.
UT, [Untreated]; A, [Emim][Br]; B, [Edmim][Br]; C, [Bmim][Br]; D, [Hmim][Br]; E, [Omim][Br].
FTIR intensity value obtained for different ILs pretreated water hyacinth (WH) samples.
| Untreated | 89.644 | 92.379 | 93.470 | 91.286 | 91.450 | 94.193 | 87.626 | 80.497 | 89.647 |
| [Emim][Br] | 99.578 | 99.488 | 99.250 | 93.311 | 95.628 | 91.101 | 91.465 | 85.464 | 99.604 |
| [Edmim][Br] | 99.529 | 98.402 | 98.267 | 96.677 | 97.718 | 92.090 | 98.017 | 97.910 | 97.197 |
| [Bmim][Br] | 99.345 | 99.281 | 99.576 | 94.541 | 93.946 | 93.177 | 95.854 | 96.183 | 96.094 |
| [Hmim][Br] | 99.358 | 98.996 | 99.317 | 94.421 | 96.162 | 93.580 | 92.734 | 83.454 | 95.288 |
| [Omim][Br] | 99.246 | 99.047 | 99.650 | 94.659 | 96.938 | 93.791 | 94.709 | 88.338 | 95.082 |
LOI, TCI and HBI index of untreated, ionic liquid treated water hyacinth (WH) samples.
| Untreated | 0.980 | 0.940 | 1.870 |
| [Emim][Br] | 1.570 | 0.997 | 1.291 |
| [Edmim][Br] | 1.450 | 0.980 | 1.383 |
| [Bmim][Br] | 1.389 | 0.971 | 1.537 |
| [Hmim][Br] | 1.237 | 0.965 | 1.649 |
| [Omim][Br] | 1.190 | 0.953 | 1.779 |
LOI, lateral order index or crystallinity index; TCI, total crystallinity index; HBI, hydrogen bond intensity.
Figure 3PXRD patterns of untreated and pretreated water hyacinth (WH) biomass samples: (A) (UT) [Untreated]; (B) [Emim][Br] treated; (C) [Edmim][Br] treated; (D) [Bmim][Br] treated; (E) [Hmim][Br] treated and (F) [Omim][Br] treated.
CrI value of water hyacinth (WH) biomass.
| 1 | Untreated | 18.63 | – |
| 2 | [Emim][Br] treated | 26.38 | 41 |
| 3 | [Edmim][Br] treated | 25.41 | 36 |
| 4 | [Bmim][Br] treated | 22.01 | 18 |
| 5 | [Hmim][Br] treated | 21.32 | 14 |
| 6 | [Omim][Br] treated | 20.73 | 11 |
Figure 4SEM images of water hyacinth biomass at following magnification (500×, 1000×, 3000×); (a–c) untreated biomass; (d–f) [Emim][Br]-pretreated water hyacinth biomass; (g–i) [Edmim][Br]-pretreated water hyacinth biomass; (j-l) [Bmim][Br]-pretreated water hyacinth biomass; (m–o) [Hmim][Br]-pretreated water hyacinth biomass; (p-r) [Omim][Br]-pretreated water hyacinth biomass.
Figure 5DSC curve that indicate the energy consumption property of cellulose of hyacinth biomass.