| Literature DB >> 30519500 |
Ting Su1,2, Yong-Qiang Shu3, Kang-Cheng Liu1, Lei Ye1, Ling-Long Chen3, Wen-Qing Shi1, You-Lan Min1, Xiao-Wei Xu1, Qing Yuan1, Pei-Wen Zhu1, Yi Shao1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the difference of the default mode network (DMN) in patients with retinal detachment (RD) by the study of the resting state functional connectivity (rs-FC).Entities:
Keywords: default mode network; functional MRI; functional connectivity; retinal detachment
Year: 2018 PMID: 30519500 PMCID: PMC6269132 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.7.6.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Information About MRI Parameters
Demographics and Clinical Measures by Group
Figure 1The correlation matrix of subregions of the mean time series of DMN. (A) The correlation matrix of the subregions in the mean time series of the RD group; (B) the correlation matrix of the subregions in the mean time series of the control group. Note: The photo represents DMN as the result of the subregions' FC. Different colors represent different connection coefficients. L, left; R, right.
Figure 2The different FC of the DMN between the RD and NC group. There were significant differences between RD and NC subjects. The different colored dots represent different nodes; the blue lines denote stronger correlations in RD group at the threshold. P < 0.05.
Figure 3ROC curve analysis of the FC values in each paired subregion. The area under the ROC curve for MTL.L-PCC was 0.642 (P = 0.123; 95% CI: 0.464–0.821); MTL.L-HF.L, 0.665 (P = 0.074; 95% CI: 0.496–0.834); MTL.L-HF.R, 0.730 (P = 0.013; 95% CI: 0.569–0.891); MTL.L-IPC.L, 0.628 (P = 0.168; 95% CI: 0.454–0.801); MTL.L-IPC.R, 0.763 (P = 0.005; 95% CI: 0.610–0.915). CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4The rs-FC results of DMN in the RD group. Compared with the control group, the rs-FC of PCC was increased to various extents: 1-HF (L) (t = 2.502, P = 0.017); 2-MTL (L) (t = 2.147, P = 0.038); 3-HF (R) (t = 2.708, P = 0.01); 4-IPC (L) (t = 2.061, P = 0.046); and 5-IPC (R) (t = 2.586, P = 0.014) in RD patients. The sizes of the spots represent the degree of quantitative changes.