| Literature DB >> 30519325 |
Maliha Ghaffar1, Sara Khodahemmati1, Jintao Li1, Muhammad Shahzad2, Minglian Wang1, Yangjunqi Wang1, Changshuo Li1, Su Chen3, Yi Zeng1,4.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is one of the leading malignancies globally and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been proved to have an important role in different malignancies including esophageal cancer. However their role in disease progression is still not clear. The objective of the study was to investigate the expression and role of LINC01234 in progression of esophageal cancer cells. LncRNA LINC01234 was found to be upregulated in esophageal cancer cells by chip sequencing. The expression level of LINC01234 was detected from different esophageal cancer cell lines by qRT-PCR. After this, the LINC01234 knockdown effects on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis were evaluated by cell proliferation assay, wound healing assay, invasion assay, and flow cytometric analysis in vitro. Expression of lncRNA LINC01234 was found to be markedly upregulated in the CEC2 cell line. Furthermore, cell proliferation, migration and invasion were significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed as compared to negative control while apoptotic rate was also found increased as a result of the knockdown of LINC01234. Significantly upregulated expression of LINC01234 in CEC2 cells and downregulated expression after knockdown is observed. The impact of LINC01234 knockdown on cell migration, invasion, proliferation and apoptosis indicated that LINC01234 may represent a new marker and a potential therapeutic target for esophageal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: LINC01234; cell proliferation; esophageal cancer; flow cytometry; invasion; long noncoding RNA
Year: 2018 PMID: 30519325 PMCID: PMC6277620 DOI: 10.7150/jca.26095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1Expression of LINC01234 in different Cell Lines. (A) Expression of LINC01234 in different Esophageal cancer cell lines compared with immortalized cell line (HaCat) (B) Expression level of LINC01234 in CEC2 cells following treatment with three si-LINC01234 and si-NC. (*P<0.05).
Figure 2Effect of LINC01234 Knockdown on cell migration in CEC2 cells. (A) Representative images of cell migration. (B) Migration rate decreases after LINC01234 knockdown as compared to NC in CEC2 cells.
Figure 3Knockdown of LINC01234 decreases invasion capacity in CEC2 cells. (A) Representative images showing transwell invasion of CEC2 cells. (B) Bar chart represented the number of invasive cells. (*P<0.05).
Figure 4Knockdown of LINC01234 suppresses the cell proliferation (A) Knockdown of LINC01234 suppresses the growth in vitro (in CEC2 cell line) as compared to NC when assessed by CCK8 (B) Cell proliferation was also assessed by colony forming assay (C) Colony number is significantly decreased in CEC2 cells after knockdown of LINC01234 as compared to NC (*P<0.05).
Figure 5Effects of LINC01234 Knockdown on Cell apoptosis determined by flow cytometric analysis. (A) Representative images of cell apoptosis by flow cytometry (B) Bar chart represents the percentage of apoptotic cells in si-NC and si-LINC01234.