| Literature DB >> 30518992 |
Amia Downes1, Emily Novicki1, John Howard1.
Abstract
Interest from Congress, executive branch leadership, and various other stakeholders for greater accountability in government continues to gain momentum today with government-wide efforts. However, measuring the impact of research programs has proven particularly difficult. Cause and effect linkages between research findings and changes to morbidity and mortality are difficult to prove. To address this challenge, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health program evaluators used a modified version of contribution analysis (CA) to evaluate two research programs. CA proved to be a useful framework for assessing research impact, and both programs received valuable, actionable feedback. Although there is room to further refine our approach, this was a promising step toward moving beyond bibiliometrics to more robust assessment of research impact.Entities:
Keywords: case studies; government evaluation; impact evaluation; public health
Year: 2018 PMID: 30518992 PMCID: PMC6275099 DOI: 10.1177/1098214018767046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Eval ISSN: 1098-2140