Literature DB >> 30518992

Using the Contribution Analysis Approach to Evaluate Science Impact: A Case Study of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Amia Downes1, Emily Novicki1, John Howard1.   

Abstract

Interest from Congress, executive branch leadership, and various other stakeholders for greater accountability in government continues to gain momentum today with government-wide efforts. However, measuring the impact of research programs has proven particularly difficult. Cause and effect linkages between research findings and changes to morbidity and mortality are difficult to prove. To address this challenge, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health program evaluators used a modified version of contribution analysis (CA) to evaluate two research programs. CA proved to be a useful framework for assessing research impact, and both programs received valuable, actionable feedback. Although there is room to further refine our approach, this was a promising step toward moving beyond bibiliometrics to more robust assessment of research impact.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case studies; government evaluation; impact evaluation; public health

Year:  2018        PMID: 30518992      PMCID: PMC6275099          DOI: 10.1177/1098214018767046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Eval        ISSN: 1098-2140


  5 in total

1.  Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact.

Authors:  Cathy C Sarli; Ellen K Dubinsky; Kristi L Holmes
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2010-01

2.  Contribution mapping: a method for mapping the contribution of research to enhance its impact.

Authors:  Maarten O Kok; Albertine J Schuit
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2012-07-02

3.  Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: testing a new impact assessment tool.

Authors:  Gillian Cohen; Jacqueline Schroeder; Robyn Newson; Lesley King; Lucie Rychetnik; Andrew J Milat; Adrian E Bauman; Sally Redman; Simon Chapman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 4.  Research impact: a narrative review.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; James Raftery; Steve Hanney; Matthew Glover
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 5.  Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Sindhuja Tatagari; Sandro C Esteves; Avi Harlev; Ralf Henkel; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Sheryl Homa; Nicolás Garrido Puchalt; Ranjith Ramasamy; Ahmad Majzoub; Kim Dao Ly; Eva Tvrda; Mourad Assidi; Kavindra Kesari; Reecha Sharma; Saleem Banihani; Edmund Ko; Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Jaime Gosalvez; Asher Bashiri
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Preparing Teens to Stay Safe and Healthy on the Job: a Multilevel Evaluation of the Talking Safety Curriculum for Middle Schools and High Schools.

Authors:  Rebecca J Guerin; Andrea H Okun; John P Barile; James G Emshoff; Michelle D Ediger; Devin S Baker
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-05

2.  Translation research in occupational health and safety settings: Common ground and future directions.

Authors:  Thomas R Cunningham; Pamela J Tinc; Rebecca J Guerin; Paul A Schulte
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2020-08-01

3.  A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research.

Authors:  Brian M Belcher; Rachel Davel; Rachel Claus
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-01-23

4.  A research impact model for work and health.

Authors:  Dwayne Van Eerd; Cindy Moser; Ron Saunders
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.