| Literature DB >> 30517736 |
Daniel O'Reilly1, Zachary J Kartje2, Eman A Ageely2, Elise Malek-Adamian1, Maryam Habibian1, Annabelle Schofield1, Christopher L Barkau3, Kushal J Rohilla3, Lauren B DeRossett2, Austin T Weigle2, Masad J Damha1, Keith T Gagnon2,3.
Abstract
CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat) endonucleases are at the forefront of biotechnology, synthetic biology and gene editing. Methods for controlling enzyme properties promise to improve existing applications and enable new technologies. CRISPR enzymes rely on RNA cofactors to guide catalysis. Therefore, chemical modification of the guide RNA can be used to characterize structure-activity relationships within CRISPR ribonucleoprotein (RNP) enzymes and identify compatible chemistries for controlling activity. Here, we introduce chemical modifications to the sugar-phosphate backbone of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 CRISPR RNA (crRNA) to probe chemical and structural requirements. Ribose sugars that promoted or accommodated A-form helical architecture in and around the crRNA 'seed' region were tolerated best. A wider range of modifications were acceptable outside of the seed, especially D-2'-deoxyribose, and we exploited this property to facilitate exploration of greater chemical diversity within the seed. 2'-fluoro was the most compatible modification whereas bulkier O-methyl sugar modifications were less tolerated. Activity trends could be rationalized for selected crRNAs using RNP stability and DNA target binding experiments. Cas9 activity in vitro tolerated most chemical modifications at predicted 2'-hydroxyl contact positions, whereas editing activity in cells was much less tolerant. The biochemical principles of chemical modification identified here will guide CRISPR-Cas9 engineering and enable new or improved applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30517736 PMCID: PMC6344873 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1.Dual RNA-guided Cas9 and sugar–phosphate chemical modifications. (A) Sequence and secondary structure of a dual RNA guide for Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9. Asterisks indicate structure-predicted 2′-OH contacts with Cas9. (B) Chemically modified nucleotides and linkers used in this study.
Figure 2.Modification schemes and the corresponding Cas9 enzyme activity for chemically modified crRNAs. Entire crRNAs or large sequence tracts in the guide, seed or tracrRNA-pairing region are modified. crRNA sequence is shown above and structure-predicted 2′-OH contacts with Cas9 are indicated with asterisks below. Enzyme activity is reported to the right. Error is reported as standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) for three or more replicates.
Figure 3.Modification schemes investigating effects on Cas9 enzyme activity primarily at the seed region. crRNA sequence is shown above and structure-predicted 2′-OH contacts with Cas9 are indicated with asterisks below. Enzyme activity is reported to the right. Error is reported as s.e.m for three or more replicates.
Figure 4.Thermal denaturation, target binding and a second guide sequence help rationalize crRNA activity trends. (A) RNP thermal denaturation monitored by UV absorbance at 280 nm. Error is reported as s.e.m. for two replicates. (B) Substrate engagement measured by dot-blot filter binding of radiolabeled target DNA. Error is reported as s.e.m. for three or more replicates. (C) In vitro cleavage activity of Cas9 RNPs assembled with chemically modified crRNAs targeting an EGFP gene. crRNA sequence is shown above and structure-predicted 2′-OH contacts with Cas9 are indicated with asterisks below. Enzyme activity is reported to the right. Error is reported as s.e.m. for three or more replicates. (D) Cell-based editing activity of crRNAs co-transfected with tracrRNA into HEK 293T cells stably expressing EGFP and Cas9. Gene editing efficiency was measured as loss of EGFP fluorescence by flow cytometry 5 days post-transfection. Error is reported as s.e.m. for four replicate treatments.