Dear Editor,We read the article entitled "Lifestyle Intervention on Metabolic Syndrome and its Impact
on Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Trial", by Saboya et al.[1] with great interest and would like to
contribute with some suggestions.Firstly, regarding the method. There are no reports about the blinding of the evaluators,
both for the interviews and for body mass index and waist circumference measurements.
This is a factor considered a high risk of bias by the "Cochrane Collaboration's tool
for assessing risk of bias"[2] since the
interviewers, even unconsciously, may influence the responses and their view of the
participants.Secondly, regarding the results. The researchers reported that the quality of life of
patients with metabolic syndrome is affected not only by the clinical picture but is
also significantly affected by the presence of depression and anxiety.[1] The prevalence of depression and anxiety
was 41.7% and 22.2%, respectively, and these data are not associated with the metabolic
syndrome components.Anxiety and depression have often been associated with metabolic syndrome, as well as
other non-transmissible chronic diseases, due to the limiting characteristic the disease
has on the individuals' lives. The present study did not demonstrate this association,
perhaps due to the sample size, which was too small for a study with so many stages and
variables for assessment.The substantial loss of subjects may have compromised the results. Most studies[3,4]
that associate metabolic syndrome with depression and anxiety, and also evaluate these
patients' quality of life, have a larger sample size.
Authors: Renata Perfeito Ribeiro; Maria Helena Palucci Marziale; Julia Trevisan Martins; Patrícia Helena Vivan Ribeiro; Maria Lucia do Carmo Cruz Robazzi; José Carlos Dalmas Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2015-07-03