Beth A Beidleman1, Charles S Fulco2, Ellen L Glickman3, Allen Cymerman2, Robert W Kenefick2, Bruce S Cadarette2, Sean P Andrew2, Janet E Staab4, Ingrid V Sils2, Stephen R Muza5. 1. 1 Biophysics and Biomedical Modeling Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts. 2. 2 Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts. 3. 5 School of Exercise Science, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio. 4. 3 Military Performance Division, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts. 5. 4 Strategic Scientific Management Office, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 2 days of staging at 2500-3500 m, combined with either high or low physical activity, reduces acute mountain sickness (AMS) during subsequent ascent to 4300 m. METHODS:Three independent groups of unacclimatized men and women were staged for 2 days at either 2500 m (n = 18), 3000 m (n = 16), or 3500 m (n = 15) before ascending and living for 2 days at 4300 m and compared with a control group that directly ascended to 4300 m (n = 12). All individuals departed to the staging altitudes or 4300 m after spending one night at 2000 m during which they breathed supplemental oxygen to simulate sea level conditions. Half in each group participated in ∼3 hours of daily physical activity while half were sedentary. Women accounted for ∼25% of each group. AMS incidence was assessed using the Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire. AMS was classified as mild (≥0.7 and <1.5), moderate (≥1.5 and <2.6), and severe (≥2.6). RESULTS: While staging, the incidence of AMS was lower (p < 0.001) in the 2500 m (0%), 3000 m (13%), and 3500 m (40%) staged groups than the direct ascent control group (83%). After ascent to 4300 m, the incidence of AMS was lower in the 3000 m (43%) and 3500 m (40%) groups than the 2500 m group (67%) and direct ascent control (83%). Neither activity level nor sex influenced the incidence of AMS during further ascent to 4300 m. CONCLUSIONS: Two days of staging at either 3000 or 3500 m, with or without physical activity, reduced AMS during subsequent ascent to 4300 m but staging at 3000 m may be recommended because of less incidence of AMS.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 2 days of staging at 2500-3500 m, combined with either high or low physical activity, reduces acute mountain sickness (AMS) during subsequent ascent to 4300 m. METHODS: Three independent groups of unacclimatized men and women were staged for 2 days at either 2500 m (n = 18), 3000 m (n = 16), or 3500 m (n = 15) before ascending and living for 2 days at 4300 m and compared with a control group that directly ascended to 4300 m (n = 12). All individuals departed to the staging altitudes or 4300 m after spending one night at 2000 m during which they breathed supplemental oxygen to simulate sea level conditions. Half in each group participated in ∼3 hours of daily physical activity while half were sedentary. Women accounted for ∼25% of each group. AMS incidence was assessed using the Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire. AMS was classified as mild (≥0.7 and <1.5), moderate (≥1.5 and <2.6), and severe (≥2.6). RESULTS: While staging, the incidence of AMS was lower (p < 0.001) in the 2500 m (0%), 3000 m (13%), and 3500 m (40%) staged groups than the direct ascent control group (83%). After ascent to 4300 m, the incidence of AMS was lower in the 3000 m (43%) and 3500 m (40%) groups than the 2500 m group (67%) and direct ascent control (83%). Neither activity level nor sex influenced the incidence of AMS during further ascent to 4300 m. CONCLUSIONS: Two days of staging at either 3000 or 3500 m, with or without physical activity, reduced AMS during subsequent ascent to 4300 m but staging at 3000 m may be recommended because of less incidence of AMS.
Authors: Maja Schlittler; Hannes Gatterer; Rachel Turner; Ivo B Regli; Simon Woyke; Giacomo Strapazzon; Peter Rasmussen; Michael Kob; Thomas Mueller; Jens P Goetze; Marc Maillard; Gerrit van Hall; Eric Feraille; Christoph Siebenmann Journal: J Physiol Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 5.182