Literature DB >> 30516874

Clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and acceptability of community-based treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: A mixed method systematic review.

Davoud Pourmarzi1, Lisa Hall1,2, Julie Hepworth3, Andrew Smirnov2, Tony Rahman4,5, Gerrard FitzGerald1.   

Abstract

Several community-based models for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been implemented to improve treatment accessibility and health outcomes. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding how well these models achieve the desired goals. We conducted a mixed-method systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence about clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and acceptability of community-based HCV treatment models. Seventeen databases were researched for published and unpublished studies. Methodological quality was assessed using The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. Quantitative findings were synthesized in narrative form and qualitative findings were synthesized using meta-synthesis. Forty-two quantitative and six qualitative studies were included. No relevant cost effectiveness studies were found. Five categories of community-based models were identified: telehealth, integration of HCV and addiction services, integration of HCV and HIV services, integration of HCV and primary care, and implementation by a home care and health care management company. The range of reported outcomes included; end of treatment response: 48.7% to 96%, serious side effects: 3.3% to 27.8%, sustained virological response: 22.3% to 95.5%, relapse: 2.2% to 16.7%, and treatment completion: 33.4% to 100%. Inconsistent measures of uptake and adherence were used; uptake ranged from 8.3% to 92%, and 68.4% to 100% of patients received ≥80% of prescribed doses. Patient reported experiences included trusted and supportive care providers, safe and trusted services, easily accessible care, and positive psychological and behavioural changes. The clinical effectiveness and acceptability reported from the included studies are similar to or better than reported outcomes from systematic reviews of studies in tertiary settings. Studies of the cost effectiveness of community-based models for treating HCV are needed.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community-based; direct acting antivirals; hepatitis C; primary health care; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30516874     DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Viral Hepat        ISSN: 1352-0504            Impact factor:   3.728


  4 in total

1.  Hepatitis C Treatment by Nonspecialist Providers in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era.

Authors:  Shashi N Kapadia; Phyllis Johnson; Kristen M Marks; Bruce R Schackman; Yuhua Bao
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.178

2.  Outcomes of a tertiary-based innovative approach to engage primary care providers in provision of hepatitis C treatment in community settings.

Authors:  Davoud Pourmarzi; Hayley Thompson; James A Thomas; Lisa Hall; Andrew Smirnov; Gerard FitzGerald; Tony Rahman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Perceived physical health outcomes of direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stelliana Goutzamanis; Danielle Horyniak; Joseph S Doyle; Margaret Hellard; Peter Higgs
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 4.  Patient Centeredness in Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Delivery to People Who Inject Drugs: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Moaz Abdelwadoud; T Joseph Mattingly; Hemanuel Arroyo Seguí; Emily F Gorman; Eleanor M Perfetto
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.883

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.