Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is one of the most challenging cancers.
Epidemiological studies have shown that during the past 30 years neither a change in
stage at diagnosis nor a significant improvement in survival has been achieved.1 Therefore, new diagnostic and therapeutic
strategies are needed for early detection of metastases or disease recurrence and
tumor growth control.MTC is a neuroendocrine neoplasm deriving from thyroid parafollicular C
cells. It accounts for nearly 5% to 10% of thyroid malignancies. The overall
prognosis for MTC patients is relatively good. One-third of patients present with a
locally invasive tumor or clinically apparent spread to the regional lymph nodes.
Distant metastases are present in 13% of patients at initial diagnosis and portend a
poor prognosis. Recurrent disease develops in approximately 50% of patients.2 Using a prior TNM classification system (7th
edition), the 10-year survival rates for stages I, II, III, and IV are 100%, 93%,
71%, and 21%, respectively.One-third of MTC cases result from a germline activating mutation in the
proto-oncogene rearranged during transfection with a strong correlation between
these mutations and their corresponding phenotypes.Surgery is the only effective therapy in MTC. Undetectable basal serum
calcitonin levels are a strong predictor of complete remission. When calcitonin
levels are elevated, a careful evaluation and localization of postsurgical remnant
tissue, early local recurrence, or metastases must be performed. Procalcitonin is an
independent predictor of MTC progression. High procalcitonin-to-calcitonin ratios
correlate with a high risk of progressive disease and shorter progression-free
survival. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen is a useful biomarker of MTC, especially in
poorly differentiated metastatic cases with lost ability to produce calcitonin. In
some MTC patients with elevated postoperative calcitonin and short calcitonin
doubling time, diagnostic and therapeutic options are limited due to unsuccessful
disease localization with established imaging techniques, until the basal calcitonin
level is at least 150 pg/ml.3–5 Therefore, a search for new targets and
corresponding radionuclide imaging biomarkers is warranted.There is still no efficient, universally recommended treatment regimen for
advanced MTC. External beam therapy does not play a significant role. Conventional
chemotherapy is of limited value. Newer agents such as irinotecan (a topoisomerase I
inhibitor) and 17-AAG (a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor) are being evaluated in
clinical trials.6Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently being investigated (Supplementary material,
Table S1). Vandetanib and cabozatinib have been approved for
use in 2011 and 2012, respectively, by the Food and Drug Administration and European
Medicines Agency. The low rate of partial responses to TKI therapy and absence of
complete responses in any of the various trials of mono-therapy emphasize the need
for new, more effective agents with acceptable toxicity.7In clinical practice, evaluation of patients with MTC engages every available
diagnostic option. Anatomic imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], or
magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and numerous molecular imaging methods (positron
emission tomography computed tomography and single-photon emission computed
tomography–computed tomography [SPECT-CT]; Supplementary material,
Table S2) have been used to localize recurrence or metastases
of MTC. However, there are still many patients with negative imaging results.The cholecystokinin 2 (CCK2) receptor is over-expressed in over
90% of MTC cases.8 Some of the CCK2
receptor–related peptides were tested in clinical pilot studies in humans.
Receptor targeting was achieved to some extent in CCK2/gastrin receptor
expressing tissues and, most importantly, in tumor tissue with a high
tumor-to-background ratio. The CCK-2/gastrin receptors are also a promising target
for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as the peptide can be labeled with
either a γ- or β-emitting radionuclide such as 90Y and
177Lu.In an attempt to produce therapeutic options with CCK2/gastrin
receptor–binding radiolabeled analogues, further research was initiated and
coordinated within the European COST Action BM0607 “Targeted Radionuclide
Therapy.”9,10 In these comparative studies, one derivative, namely
DOTA-DGlu-DGlu-DGlu-DGlu-DGlu-DGlu-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2
(CP04), showed the most promising characteristics: high metabolic stability and
receptor affinity with a high and prolonged tumor uptake against low renal retention
and was therefore selected for clinical evaluation.11 This derivative became a core substance for a new project.The GRAN-T-MTC consortium operates within the ERA-NET on Translational
Cancer Research (TRANSCAN) First Joint Transnational Call for Proposals 2011 (JTC
2011) on: “Validation of biomarkers for personalized cancer medicine.”
It aims to develop a modern method of advanced MTC treatment, utilizing the
phenomenon of overexpression of CCK2 receptor in this carcinoma. The
project is a phase I study with the 111In-labelled gastrin analogue
DOTA-(DGlu)6-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2 (CP04). The positive
results of the preclinical part of the project confirmed the possibility of
administration of 111In-CP04 to humans.12,13 The trial is registered at
www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT03246659) and has been granted
European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials number: 2015-000 805-38.
The project has been approved by the ethics committees in all centers participating
in the clinical part of the project (Supplementary material, Table S3).The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the safety of the intravenous
administration of CP04, to assess the biodistribution and dosimetry of the
CCK2/gastrin receptor ligand (111In-CP04) in cancerous and
normal tissues of the human body, and to determine critical organs. The main
secondary objectives are to evaluate the ability of CCK2/gastrin receptor
ligand-scintigraphy to detect cancer lesions and to assess the ability of gelofusine
co-injection.The study consists of 2 phases: a preclinical part (Radiopharmaceutical
development) and a clinical trial.
Radiopharmaceutical development (Work Package 1)
The first step was to establish a clinically useful formulation for the
radiolabeled peptide CP04. CP04 was prepared in GMP quality, and tests regarding
stability, radiolabeling, and toxicity were carried out. A ready-to-use
111In-CP04 kit formulation was prepared, and the Investigational
Medicinal Product Dossier was submitted to the National Authorities of the
collaborators.12,13
Clinical trial (Work Package 2)
Material and methods
A sample size of 20 to 25 recruited patients with progressive or
metastatic MTC is considered appropriate for such a study, being a reasonable
compromise to address the study’s purpose. The main inclusion criteria
are: histologically documented MTC, presence of more than 1 distant or nodal
metastases confirmed with either 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron
emission tomography–computed tomography or contrast-enhanced CT or MRI,
or calcitonin doubling time of less than 2 years if there is no anatomical
evidence of disease, and the exclusion criteria: previous external beam
radiation therapy within 2 years, pregnancy or breastfeeding, known
hypersensitivity to gastrin analogues or gelofusine (Supplementary material,
Table S4).Two peptide amounts, both radiolabeled with 111In (200
+/− 10% MBq), were administered: a low amount (10 µg) was used as
a safety step in the first applications of CP04. If its safety was assured, 50
µg (an amount also suitable for PRRT) was applied.The clinical trial consisted of 2 phases. In phase 1A, the first 4
patients were administered with both 10 µg and 50 µg of
111In-CP04. In phase 1B, only the high peptide amount of 50
µg of 111In-CP04 was given to the next enrolled patient who
was randomized to arm 1 or 2 without or with coadministration of gelofusine (a
nephroprotective agent).All baseline tumor-related sign and symptom assessments were performed
before the start of the study. All eligible patients received a centrally
assigned number. The tracer was injected within 14 days after the
patient’s inclusion. According to the study protocol, subsequent tracer
administrations were performed at intervals of at least 2 weeks, providing that
no serious adverse events were observed.Dosimetry was planned after each tracer injection including activity
measurements in blood and urine, and a series of scintigraphy images: dynamic
acquisitions of the abdominal region (0–30 minutes postinjection), planar
whole-body acquisition (30–60 minutes 4, 24, and 48 hours postinjection),
abdominal and neck or mediastinum SPECT-CT images (4–5 [optional] and 24
hours postinjection). Blood samples were collected for calcitonin and
procalcitonin measurements.Eight follow-up visits are planned up to 4 months after the tracer
administration to assess the CP04 safety profile according to the Common
Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.The study flowcharts are shown in Figure
1 and in Supplementary material (Table S3). Statistical
analysis is done both on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. The
clinical trial was conducted according to international standards and the
principles of the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical
Practice, with applicable local regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study protocol (phases 1A and 1B)
The completed preclinical part of the study showed that 111In
CP04 can be prepared using a simple kit procedure, suitable for clinical use.
According to the study protocol, each of the first 4 MTC patients enrolled in
the study was injected with both peptide amounts (10 µg and 50 µg)
of the gastrin analogue 111In-CP04. These initial examinations
revealed that 111In-CP04 was safe after intravenous injection (no
serious adverse events were reported) and that the MTC metastases could be
detected with high sensitivity. Biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry data
also showed 111In-CP04 as a promising radio-pharmaceutical for PRRT
of advanced MTC cases.
Discussion
The main goal of the study is to translate the preclinical research results
into the protocols confirming the usefulness of the peptide targeting CCK-2/gastrin
receptors as a diagnostic and potentially also a therapeutic tool. Among the several
new biomarkers investigated in recent years, the CP04 showed good stability and
affinity to CCK-2/gastrin receptor in vitro, as well as favorable biodistribution
and pharmacokinetic properties in vivo. For these reasons, it has been selected for
the current study. CCK-2/gastrin receptors may become viable targets for
radionuclide scintigraphy and PRRT, while nephrotoxicity and myelotoxicity will be
minimized. In the last 2 decades, the somatostatin receptors were instrumental to
implementing peptide receptor–mediated radionuclide diagnosis and therapy
into clinical practice. It can be expected that CCK-2/gastrin receptor imaging will
become also a valid diagnostic method for a specific and noninvasive staging and
follow-up of patients with MTC.In conclusion, the project represents the first step towards establishing a
new, more efficient strategy for the diagnosis, early detection, and therapy of
recurrent or metastatic MTC. CCK2/gastrin receptor may become a new
target for radionuclide scintigraphy and PRRT (theranostic approach), with
nephrotoxicity and myelotoxicity minimized by appropriate measures.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary material is available with the article at www.pamw.pl.
Authors: Samuel A Wells; Sylvia L Asa; Henning Dralle; Rossella Elisei; Douglas B Evans; Robert F Gagel; Nancy Lee; Andreas Machens; Jeffrey F Moley; Furio Pacini; Friedhelm Raue; Karin Frank-Raue; Bruce Robinson; M Sara Rosenthal; Massimo Santoro; Martin Schlumberger; Manisha Shah; Steven G Waguespack Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Christine Rangger; Jane Sosabowski; Peter Laverman; Jean-Claude Reubi; Irene Johanna Virgolini; Clemens Decristoforo Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Meltem Ocak; Anna Helbok; Christine Rangger; Petra Kolenc Peitl; Berthold A Nock; Giancarlo Morelli; Annemarie Eek; Jane K Sosabowski; Wout A P Breeman; Jean Claude Reubi; Clemens Decristoforo Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Kenko Cupisti; Achim Wolf; Andreas Raffel; Matthias Schott; Daniel Miersch; Qin Yang; Claus F Eisenberger; Hans D Röher; Wolfram T Knoefel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Enrique Grande; Michael C Kreissl; Sebastiano Filetti; Kate Newbold; Walter Reinisch; Caroline Robert; Martin Schlumberger; Lærke K Tolstrup; Jose L Zamorano; Jaume Capdevila Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Anton A Hörmann; Maximilian Klingler; Christine Rangger; Christian Mair; Clemens Decristoforo; Christian Uprimny; Irene J Virgolini; Elisabeth von Guggenberg Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2021-06-16
Authors: Anton Amadeus Hörmann; Maximilian Klingler; Maliheh Rezaeianpour; Nikolas Hörmann; Ronald Gust; Soraya Shahhosseini; Elisabeth von Guggenberg Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Berthold A Nock; Panagiotis Kanellopoulos; Oleg G Chepurny; Maritina Rouchota; George Loudos; George G Holz; Eric P Krenning; Theodosia Maina Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 6.321