OBJECTIVE: To compare the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with an orthodontic brush head versus a sonic toothbrush in adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, examiner-blind, replicate single-use, two-treatment, four-period, crossover study with a washout period between visits of approximately 24 hours. Forty-four adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances in both arches were randomized based on a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of four toothbrush treatment sequences. The primary outcome was plaque score change from baseline, measured using digital plaque imaging analysis. RESULTS:Baseline plaque levels for both brush treatments were high, covering more than 50% of the tooth area. Effective plaque removal was observed with both brush treatments (P < .001); however, the reduction in plaque with the oscillating-rotating toothbrush was statistically significantly greater (P = .017) compared with the sonic toothbrush. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence for more effective plaque-removing efficacy of the oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus the sonic toothbrush among orthodontic patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with an orthodontic brush head versus a sonic toothbrush in adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, examiner-blind, replicate single-use, two-treatment, four-period, crossover study with a washout period between visits of approximately 24 hours. Forty-four adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances in both arches were randomized based on a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of four toothbrush treatment sequences. The primary outcome was plaque score change from baseline, measured using digital plaque imaging analysis. RESULTS: Baseline plaque levels for both brush treatments were high, covering more than 50% of the tooth area. Effective plaque removal was observed with both brush treatments (P < .001); however, the reduction in plaque with the oscillating-rotating toothbrush was statistically significantly greater (P = .017) compared with the sonic toothbrush. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence for more effective plaque-removing efficacy of the oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus the sonic toothbrush among orthodontic patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Oral hygiene; Orthodontic; Plaque removal; Power toothbrushes
Authors: Malgorzata Klukowska; Annike Bader; Christina Erbe; Philip Bellamy; Donald J White; Mary Kay Anastasia; Heiner Wehrbein Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing; Eduardo Garduño; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Agustín Zerón; Paulo Vinícius Soares; Marc Saadia; Cristina Cunha Villar Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2022-08-22