Literature DB >> 30516393

Perioperative Safety in Patient Under Oral Anticoagulation During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Benedikt Becker1, Christopher Netsch1, Jens Hansen2, Axel Böhme2, Andreas J Gross1, Mario Zacharias2, Karin Lehrich2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients on oral anticoagulation (OA) with respect to intra- and postoperative bleeding complications.
METHODS: Between January 2013 and October 2016, 2178 patients were included in this study, of whom 94 received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and 151 received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) before HoLEP. All patients either ceased OA (DOACs) or were bridged subtherapeutically (VKAs, international normalized ratio <2) during surgery. These patients were compared to a sample size of 1933 nonanticoagulated patients.
RESULTS: A significant longer postoperative stay was noted for the patients on DOACs (5.2 [4-6] days) and VKAs (5.3 [4-5] days) compared to the control group (4.5 [4-4] days). The mean drop in hemoglobin was significantly higher in the VKA group compared to the DOAC and control group. There was a significantly higher rate of postoperative bladder tamponades/secondary coagulation in patients on OA with 6 (7.9%)/3 (3.9%) patients in the DOAC group, 10 (7.4%)/6 (4.4%) patients in the VKA group compared to 37 (2.2%)/21 (2.1%) patients in the control group, respectively (p < 0.001). Eight patients required blood transfusions with a distribution of 1 (1.3%), 3 (2.2%), and 4 (0.2%) patients in the DOAC, VKA, and control group, respectively (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that bridged patients who's DOACs and VKAs were ceased before HoLEP are at higher risk of intra- and postoperative bleeding complications. Nonetheless, HoLEP appears to be a safe and effective procedure in those patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HoLEP; anticoagulation; benign prostatic enlargement; holmium laser; lasers; prostate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30516393     DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  Reasons to go for thulium-based anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  B Becker; C Netsch; G Bozzini; T R W Herrmann; T Bach; D Enikeev; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia-resection, vaporization or enucleation?]

Authors:  M Rieken; T R W Herrmann; C Füllhase
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in benign prostate hyperplasia patients with or without oral antithrombotic drugs: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaonan Zheng; Liao Peng; Dehong Cao; Xin Han; Hang Xu; Lu Yang; Jianzhong Ai; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Surgeon's heuristics and decision making: a BPH storytelling.

Authors:  Vincent Misrai; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Recent evidence for anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) in patients with benign prostatic obstruction on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  C Netsch; T R W Herrmann; G Bozzini; L Berti; A J Gross; B Becker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: efficacy, safety and preoperative management in patients presenting with anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Marina Deuker; Jessica Rührup; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Maria Welte; Luis A Kluth; Severine Banek; Frederik C Roos; Philipp Mandel; Felix K-H Chun; Andreas Becker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.226

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.