Literature DB >> 30516345

Relationship between EGFR mutation and computed tomography characteristics of the lung in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Xiaowei Qiu1, Hang Yuan1, Bin Sima1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between EGFR mutation and computed tomography (CT) features in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung.
METHODS: One hundred and ninety two lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgery were retrospectively included in this study. Examination of EGFR gene mutation was performed on all resected tumor samples. The 192 recruited lung adenocarcinoma patients were divided into groups according to EGFR mutation status: patients with mutations in exons 18-21 (effective mutated, n = 61) and non-mutated (n = 131). The clinical characteristics and lung CT imaging features of the two groups were recorded and compared. Univariate and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the independent risk factors relevant to effective EGFR gene mutation.
RESULTS: The independent risk factors relevant to effective EGFR mutation were evaluated by logistic regression test. The results indicated that female gender (odds ratio [OR] 3.23), lung CT features of lymphangitis carcinomatosa (OR 2.66), semi-solid lesion density (OR 3.56), and spicule sign (OR 1.61) were independent risk factors relevant to EGFR mutation.
CONCLUSION: Female patients with lung CT features of lymphangitis carcinomatosa, semi-solid lesion density, and spicule sign are more prone to harbor EGFR gene mutations and are more likely to benefit from targeted therapy.
© 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT feature; EGFR mutation; lung adenocarcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30516345      PMCID: PMC6360198          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


Introduction

Epidemiology studies have shown that lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignant carcinoma and the leading cause of cancer‐related death in men and second in women.1, 2 Generally, lung cancer prognosis is poor with low long‐term survival rates. It is reported that approximately 75–80% of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have advanced or locally advanced disease.3 Patients with advanced disease have lost the opportunity of surgery and thus are treated by chemoradiation or targeted therapy. At present, the most commonly used target drugs for NSCLC treatment are EGFRtyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including gefitinib and erlotinib.4, 5, 6 However, not all NSCLC patients can benefit from EGFR‐TKI treatment. Prognosis can only be improved in patients with effective EGFR mutations, which frequently occur in exons 18–21 and are part of the gene coding for the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR protein. In patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC, the most common activating mutations observed are exon 19 deletions and an L858R point mutation in exon 21.7, 8 Treatment with EGFR‐TKIs can significantly improve overall and disease‐free survival in NSCLC patients with effective EGFR gene mutations. Therefore, evaluation of EGFR mutation status is recommended in patients with NSCLC before administering target drugs.9, 10, 11 However, it is difficult to obtain adequate cancer tissue for EGFR mutation detection in some NSCLC patients. Thus, predicting effective EGFR mutation by clinical and demographic characteristics and imaging features is important. In our present study, we investigate the relationship between effective EGFR mutation and computed tomography (CT) features in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung in order to determine the CT features relevant to effective EGFR mutation.

Methods

Patients

One hundred and ninety two lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgery were retrospectively included in the study. Examination of EGFR gene mutation was performed on all resected tumor samples. The 192 recruited lung adenocarcinoma patients were divided into groups according to EGFR mutation status: effective mutated (n = 61) and non‐mutated (n = 131). The study design was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in the study.

Lung computed tomography (CT) features: Collection and analysis

All patients underwent 16 multislice spiral CT or enhanced scans. Scanning parameters were: tube voltage 120 kV, tube current 200 mA, scanning field of vision (SFOV) 300 mm or 350 mm, reconstruction image layer thickness 1.5 mm, layer interval 1.25 mm, reconstruction matrix 512 *512. For the enhanced scan, 80 mL of contrast agent was injected into the anterior elbow vein. Scanning was performed in all patients while they held their breath after inhalation. The scan ranged from the apex of the lung to the diaphragm.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. The measurement data was demonstrated by and comparison between groups was made using a Student's t‐test of the sample mean. Enumeration data were expressed by a relative number and comparison between groups was made based on chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests. Univariate logistic regression was performed for each candidate variable and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. P < 0.05 meant a statistical difference.

Results

Clinical features relevant to effective EGFR mutation

Single factor analysis showed that effective EGFR mutation was correlated with gender (P < 0.05) and smoking history (P < 0.05). Female non‐smokers were more inclined to have an EGFR gene mutation. However, effective EGFR mutation was not correlated with body mass index, clinical stage, family history of tumor, or tumor differentiation (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical features of the included patients with or without EGFR gene mutation

CharacteristicsNo. EGFR statust/χ2 P
Effective mutated (n = 71)Non‐mutated (n = 121)
Gender N, (%)9.240.002
Male11131 (27.93)80 (72.07)
Female8140 (49.38)41 (50.62)
Age (year)19262.3 ± 11.264.2 ± 10.6
Smoking N, (%)1926.160.013
Positive9025 (27.78)65 (72.22)
Negative10246 (45.10)56 (54.90)
BMI (kg·m−1)19219.2 ± 2.119.6 ± 2.6
Stage N, (%)0.760.38
I–II10341 (39.81)62 (60.19)
III8930 (33.71)59 (66.29)
CEA N, (%)0.790.37
Elevated6222 (35.48)40 (64.52)
Normal13049 (37.69)81 (62.31)
Family history of tumor N, (%)0.010.91
Positive2911 (37.93)18 (62.07)
Negative16360 (36.81)103 (63.19)
Differentiation N, (%)3.360.067
Well/moderate7742 (54.55)35 (45.45)
Poor11529 (30.53)86 (69.47)

BMI, body mass index; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.

Clinical features of the included patients with or without EGFR gene mutation BMI, body mass index; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen.

Lung CT imaging features relevant to EGFR mutation

The correlation between lung CT imaging features and effective EGFR mutation was evaluated by single factor analysis. Compared to non‐mutated EGFR cases, patients with effective mutated EGFR had more lung lesions with a lobular sign (P < 0.05), spicule sign (P < 0.05), semi‐solid lesion density (P < 0.05), air bronchogram (P < 0.05), pleural indentation sign (P < 0.05), and lymphangitis carcinomatosa (P < 0.05) (Table 2, Fig 1).
Table 2

Lung CT imaging features relevant to EGFR mutation, N, (%)

CharacteristicNo. EGFR statust/χ2 P
Effective mutated (n = 71)Non‐mutated (n = 121)
Necrosis
Positive2612 (46.15)14 (53.85)1.0860.3
Negative16659 (35.54)107 (64.46)
Cavity0.0750.78
Positive2811 (39.29)17 (60.71)
Negative16460 (36.59)104 (63.41)
Calcification0.7660.38
Positive2210 (45.45)12 (54.55)
Negative17061 (35.89)109 (64.11)
Lobular sign5.0080.025
Positive8840 (45.45)48 (54.55)
Negative10431 (29.81)73 (70.19)
Spicule sign7.6460.0057
Positive8641 (47.67)45 (52.33)
Negative10630 (28.30)76 (71.70)
Lesion density10.4110.0013
Solid16654 (32.53)112 (67.47)
Semi‐solid2617 (65.38)9 (34.62)
Diameter0.6350.426
≤ 3 cm3515 (42.86)20 (57.14)
> 3 cm15756 (35.67)101 (64.33)
Halo sign0.1650.685
Positive229 (40.91)13 (59.09)
Negative17062 (36.47)108 (63.53)
Bronchus encapsulated air sign0.7150.398
Positive216 (28.57)15 (71.43)
Negative17165 (38.01)106 (61.99)
Air bronchogram4.3710.036
Positive8438 (45.24)46 (54.76)
Negative10833 (30.56)75 (69.44)
Pleural indentation sign4.5510.032
Positive5828 (48.28)30 (51.72)
Negative13443 (32.09)91 (67.91)
Pleural effusion0.3290.566
Positive289 (32.14)19 (67.86)
Negative16462 (37.80)102 (62.20)
Lymphangitis carcinomatosa8.4350.037
Positive4324 (55.81)19 (44.19)
Negative14947 (31.54)102 (68.46)
Mediastinal lymph node enlargement2.0270.155
Positive9430 (31.91)64 (68.09)
Negative9841 (41.84)57 (58.16)

CT, computed tomography.

Figure 1

Computed tomography features in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung: Mass in the left lung accompanied by (a) necrosis and (b) with carcinomatous cavity; carcinoma of the left lung with (c) lobulated and (d) spicule sign; (e) ground glass nodule of the left lung; (f) right lung mass with halo sign; right lung carcinoma (g) diameter > 3 cm and (h) with bronchus encapsulated air sign; (i) left lung carcinoma with pleural indentation sign; (j) right lung mass with air bronchogram; (k) right thorax pleural effusion with enlarged mediastinal lymph node; and (l) right lung carcinoma with lymphangitis carcinomatosa.

Lung CT imaging features relevant to EGFR mutation, N, (%) CT, computed tomography. Computed tomography features in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung: Mass in the left lung accompanied by (a) necrosis and (b) with carcinomatous cavity; carcinoma of the left lung with (c) lobulated and (d) spicule sign; (e) ground glass nodule of the left lung; (f) right lung mass with halo sign; right lung carcinoma (g) diameter > 3 cm and (h) with bronchus encapsulated air sign; (i) left lung carcinoma with pleural indentation sign; (j) right lung mass with air bronchogram; (k) right thorax pleural effusion with enlarged mediastinal lymph node; and (l) right lung carcinoma with lymphangitis carcinomatosa.

Independent factors related to effective EGFR gene mutation

The independent factors relevant to effective EGFR mutation were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. The results indicated that female gender (odds ratio [OR] 3.23), lung CT features of lymphangitis carcinomatosa (OR 2.66), semi‐solid lesion density (OR 3.56), and spicule sign (OR 1.61) were independent factors relevant to effective EGFR mutation (Fig 2).
Figure 2

Multivariate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the estimated risks of EGFR mutation in in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Multivariate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the estimated risks of EGFR mutation in in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Discussion

The successful treatment of NSCLC with EGFR‐TKIs marks an era of targeted cancer therapy.12, 13, 14 Previous studies have proven that the prognosis of NSCLC patients with effective EGFR gene mutations can be significantly improved by EGFR‐TKI treatment.15, 16, 17 Studies have also shown that small molecule TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib) are more effective in patients with mutations in exon 18–21 of the EGFR gene, especially those with mutations in exon 19, whereas these targeted drugs are almost ineffective in patients without mutations.8 Therefore, it is important to assess EGFR gene status before administering target drugs. However, adequate histological specimens to assess EGFR gene mutation are not always available. In such patients, the effectiveness of targeted therapy is measured by clinical features, such as gender and smoking history.18, 19 Previous studies have screened clinical and demographic characteristics to determine the independent factors relevant to effective EGFR mutations that may be sensitive to EGFR‐TKI treatment.20 They found that female non‐smoking East Asian lung cancer patients were more likely to harbor effective mutations in the EGFR gene.21 Consistent with the results of previous studies, our results also showed that the mutation rate in exons 18–21 of the EGFR gene in female non‐smokers was higher than in other patients. However, judging the effectiveness of small molecule TKI therapy by clinical characteristics alone is inadequate. In recent years, medical radiologists have attempted to obtain gene mutation information indirectly from the imaging manifestations of lung cancer patients in order to obtain more imaging features to assist in identifying driving genes.22, 23 In our present work, we investigated the relationship between effective EGFR gene mutations and CT imaging characteristics and clinical features in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung in order to provide more information for small molecule TKI therapy. Our study found that female gender, lung CT features of lymphangitis carcinomatosa, semi‐solid lesion density, and spicule sign were independent factors relevant to effective EGFR mutation. In conclusion, our results show that female patients with lung CT features of lymphangitis carcinomatosa, semi‐solid lesion density, and spicule sign are more prone to harbor effective EGFR gene mutations. As a result, these patients are more likely to benefit from small molecule TKI therapy. CT imaging can be used to predict effective EGFR mutation in patients with inadequate tissue samples. The combination of CT features and driver gene status is helpful to further understand the occurrence and development of tumors to predict prognosis and promote the development of imaging genomics.

Disclosure

No authors report any conflict of interest.
  23 in total

1.  Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with pemetrexed-cisplatin, followed sequentially by gefitinib or pemetrexed, in East Asian, never-smoker patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Myung-Ju Ahn; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Jun Liang; Jin-Hyoung Kang; Qingyu Xiu; Yuh-Min Chen; Julie Michelle Blair; Guangbin Peng; Carlos Linn; Mauro Orlando
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 2.  Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of central nervous system metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: the present and the future.

Authors:  Claudia Proto; Martina Imbimbo; Rosaria Gallucci; Angela Brissa; Diego Signorelli; Milena Vitali; Marianna Macerelli; Giulia Corrao; Monica Ganzinelli; Francesca Gabriella Greco; Marina Chiara Garassino; Giuseppe Lo Russo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12

3.  Molecular characteristics predict clinical outcomes: prospective trial correlating response to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib with the presence of sensitizing mutations in the tyrosine binding domain of the EGFR gene.

Authors:  Naiyer A Rizvi; Valerie Rusch; William Pao; Jamie E Chaft; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; Lee M Krug; Christopher G Azzoli; Manjit Bains; Robert Downey; Raja Flores; Bernard Park; Bhuvanesh Singh; Maureen Zakowski; Robert T Heelan; Ronglai Shen; Mark G Kris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  CT Radiogenomic Characterization of EGFR, K-RAS, and ALK Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Stefania Rizzo; Francesco Petrella; Valentina Buscarino; Federica De Maria; Sara Raimondi; Massimo Barberis; Caterina Fumagalli; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristiano Rampinelli; Filippo De Marinis; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung cancer:Proposal for a scoring model using imaging and demographic characteristics.

Authors:  Ali Sabri; Madiha Batool; Zhaolin Xu; Drew Bethune; Mohamed Abdolell; Daria Manos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparison of Gefitinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Exon 19 Deletion.

Authors:  Satoshi Watanabe; Akira Inoue; Toshihiro Nukiwa; Kunihiko Kobayashi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 8.  Clinical significance of post-progression survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  Hisao Imai; Kyoichi Kaira; Koichi Minato
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  EGFR with TKI-sensitive mutations in exon 19 is highly expressed and frequently detected in Chinese patients with lung squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Aadil Ahmed Memon; Haiping Zhang; Ye Gu; Qian Luo; Jiajun Shi; Zixin Deng; Jian Ma; Wei Ma
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, with a Focus on Afatinib.

Authors:  Sami Morin-Ben Abdallah; Vera Hirsh
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  3 in total

1.  EGFR Gene Mutation and Methodological Evaluation in 399 Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Yun Zheng; Hai-Bo Wang; Fu-Jin Shen; Yong-Qing Tong; Qian Yao; Bin Qiao; Si Sun; Yan Li
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-13

2.  The natural course of incidentally detected, small, subsolid lung nodules-is follow-up needed beyond current guideline recommendations?

Authors:  Benedikt H Heidinger; Mario Silva; Constance de Margerie-Mellon; Paul A VanderLaan; Alexander A Bankier
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

3.  [Relationship between EGFR, ALK Gene Mutation and Imaging 
and Pathological Features in Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma].

Authors:  He Yang; Zicheng Liu; Hongya Wang; Liang Chen; Jun Wang; Wei Wen; Xinfeng Xu; Quan Zhu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2022-03-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.