Literature DB >> 30515041

Fertility Preferences of Women in a Province Center.

Elif Oksan Calikoglu1, Ezel Bilge Yerli2, Sinan Yilmaz2, Duygu Kavuncuoglu1, Zahide Kosan1, Aysun Aras1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fertility preferences and status are important parameters involved in reproductive health. The aim of the present study was to define some characteristics of the fertility preferences of women aged 15-49 years in our region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between 2013 and 2015. The study population consisted of 627 married women aged 15-49 years living in a city center. A questionnaire about socio-demographic characteristics, pregnancy and birth traits, and fertility preferences was applied. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman correlation tests were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.00 (IBM, SPSS Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA) software for statistical analyses. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The mean age of the women participating in the survey was 33.03±7.1 years. Median age at marriage was 20 years, mean age at first pregnancy was 21 years, and mean number of pregnancies was 3.07 years, with 14.6% having had more than five pregnancies and 34.6% having experienced previous miscarriages. The mean number of live births was 2.2, and 21.5% of women had waited 24 months between pregnancies. Additionally, 77.7% reported using family planning of any kind, with 62.1% using the modern method. Women's ages at first marriage varied significantly depending on education (p<0.001) and working status (p<0.001), whereas ages at first pregnancy varied significantly depending on educational status (p<0.001). The total number of pregnancies varied significantly depending on level of education, working status, and family income (p<0.001). Times between two pregnancies among women with histories of more than two pregnancies differed significantly depending on educational status (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The most important factors in women's fertility preferences are education, work, and income. Increasing women's educational levels can lead to safe and healthy pregnancies and births.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pregnancy; fertility; reproductive health

Year:  2018        PMID: 30515041      PMCID: PMC6263224          DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.17236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eurasian J Med        ISSN: 1308-8734


  6 in total

1.  Completing the fertility transition in the developing world: The role of educational differences and fertility preferences.

Authors:  John Bongaarts
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2003-11

2.  Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Gladys Martinez; Kimberly Daniels; Anjani Chandra
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2012-04-12

Review 3.  Women's education and fertility: results from 26 Demographic and Health Surveys.

Authors:  T Castro Martín
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

4.  Contraceptive knowledge and attitudes among women seeking induced abortion in Kathmandu, Nepal.

Authors:  Emilia Berin; Micaela Sundell; Chanda Karki; Jan Brynhildsen; Mats Hammar
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-03-19

5.  Assessment of Preference and Its Determinant Factors to Ward Modern Contraceptive Methods among Women of Reproductive Age Group in Shire Indaselassie Town, Northern Ethiopia, 2011.

Authors:  Weyzer T Tsehaye; Daniel Mengistu; Emebet Birhanu; Kalayou K Berhe
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2013-12-11

6.  Modern contraceptive utilization among female ART attendees in health facilities of Gimbie town, West Ethiopia.

Authors:  Addisu Polisi; Ewenat Gebrehanna; Gezahegn Tesfaye; Fekede Asefa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.223

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Socio-economic and demographic factors associated with fertility preferences among women of reproductive age in Ghana: evidence from the 2014 Demographic and Health Survey.

Authors:  Bright Opoku Ahinkorah; Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Ebenezer Kwesi Armah-Ansah; Edward Kwabena Ameyaw; Eugene Budu; Sanni Yaya
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.