Literature DB >> 30514407

Assessing cross-national invariance of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).

Baptiste Pignon1,2,3,4, Hugo Peyre5,6, Aziz Ferchiou1,2,3,4, Jim van Os7,8, Bart P F Rutten7, Robin M Murray8, Craig Morgan9, Marion Leboyer1,2,3,4, Franck Schürhoff1,2,3,4, Andrei Szöke1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a 42-item self-report questionnaire that has been developed and validated to measure the dimensions of psychosis in the general population. The CAPE has a three-factor structure with dimensions of positive, negative and depression. Assessing the cross-national equivalence of a questionnaire is an essential prerequisite before pooling data from different countries. In this study, our aim was to investigate the measurement invariance of the CAPE across different countries.
METHODS: Data were drawn from the European Union Gene-Environment Interaction (EU-GEI) study. Participants (incident cases of psychotic disorder, controls and siblings of cases) were recruited in Brazil, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and UK. To analyse the measurement invariance across these samples, we tested configural invariance (i.e. identical structures of the factors), metric invariance (i.e. equivalence of the factor loadings) and scalar invariance (i.e. equivalence of the thresholds) of the three CAPE dimensions using multigroup categorical confirmatory factor analysis methods.
RESULTS: The configural invariance model fits well, providing evidence for identical factorial structure across countries. In comparison with the configural model invariance, the fit indices were very similar in the metric and scalar invariance models, indicating that factor loadings and thresholds did not differ across the six countries.
CONCLUSION: We found that, across six countries, the CAPE showed equivalent factorial structure, factor loadings and thresholds. Thus, differences observed in scores between individuals from different countries should be considered as reflecting different levels of psychosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE); cross-national invariance; psychotic experiences; schizotypy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30514407     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718003574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  5 in total

1.  The Independent Effects of Psychosocial Stressors on Subclinical Psychosis: Findings From the Multinational EU-GEI Study.

Authors:  Baptiste Pignon; Mohamed Lajnef; James B Kirkbride; Hugo Peyre; Aziz Ferchiou; Jean-Romain Richard; Grégoire Baudin; Sarah Tosato; Hannah Jongsma; Lieuwe de Haan; Ilaria Tarricone; Miguel Bernardo; Eva Velthorst; Mauro Braca; Celso Arango; Manuel Arrojo; Julio Bobes; Cristina Marta Del-Ben; Marta Di Forti; Charlotte Gayer-Anderson; Peter B Jones; Caterina La Cascia; Antonio Lasalvia; Paulo Rossi Menezes; Diego Quattrone; Julio Sanjuán; Jean-Paul Selten; Andrea Tortelli; Pierre-Michel Llorca; Jim van Os; Bart P F Rutten; Robin M Murray; Craig Morgan; Marion Leboyer; Andrei Szöke; Franck Schürhoff
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Psychotic Experiences Are Associated With Paternal Age But Not With Delayed Fatherhood in a Large, Multinational, Community Sample.

Authors:  Franck Schürhoff; Baptiste Pignon; Mohamed Lajnef; Romain Denis; Bart Rutten; Craig Morgan; Robin M Murray; Marion Leboyer; Jim van Os; Andrei Szöke
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 7.348

3.  Validation of the Portuguese version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences and characterization of psychotic experiences in a Brazilian sample.

Authors:  Taciana C C Ragazzi; Rosana Shuhama; Jorge Sinval; João Marôco; Fabiana Corsi-Zuelli; Daiane L da Roza; Jim van Os; Paulo R Menezes; Cristina M Del-Ben
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.697

4.  The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences: Optimal cut-off scores for detecting individuals with a psychotic disorder.

Authors:  Edo S Jaya; Therese van Amelsvoort; Agna A Bartels-Velthuis; Richard Bruggeman; Wiepke Cahn; Lieuwe de Haan; Rene S Kahn; Jim van Os; Frederike Schirmbeck; Claudia J P Simons; Tania M Lincoln
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Genetic and psychosocial stressors have independent effects on the level of subclinical psychosis: findings from the multinational EU-GEI study.

Authors:  B Pignon; H Peyre; A Ayrolles; J B Kirkbride; S Jamain; A Ferchiou; J R Richard; G Baudin; S Tosato; H Jongsma; L de Haan; I Tarricone; M Bernardo; E Velthorst; M Braca; C Arango; M Arrojo; J Bobes; C M Del-Ben; M Di Forti; C Gayer-Anderson; P B Jones; C La Cascia; A Lasalvia; P R Menezes; D Quattrone; J Sanjuán; J P Selten; A Tortelli; P M Llorca; J van Os; B P F Rutten; R M Murray; C Morgan; M Leboyer; A Szöke; F Schürhoff
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 7.818

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.