| Literature DB >> 30514329 |
Anna Maria Trotta1, Sara Santagata1, Serena Zanotta2, Crescenzo D'Alterio1, Maria Napolitano1, Giuseppina Rea1, Rosa Camerlingo3, Fabio Esposito4, Elvira Lamantia5, Annamaria Anniciello5, Giovanni Botti6, Nicola Longo4, Gerardo Botti5, Sandro Pignata7, Sisto Perdonà7, Stefania Scala8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous evidence demonstrated that restoration of wild type VHL in human renal cancer cells decreased in vitro NK susceptibility. To investigate on the role of tumoral VHL status versus NK capability in renal cancer patients, 51 RCC patients were characterized for VHL mutational status and NK function.Entities:
Keywords: CD107a; Natural killer; Renal cell carcinoma; Tumor microenvironment; Von Hippel-Lindau
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30514329 PMCID: PMC6278085 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0952-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Patient characteristics (N = 55)
| Age, | |
| < 65 years | 26 (47) |
| ≥ 65 years | 29 (53) |
| Mean age ± SD, | 63 ± 11 |
| Gender, | |
| Male | 33 |
| Female | 22 |
| Histological variant, | |
| Clear Cell | 41 |
| Papillar | 4 |
| Cromophobe | 5 |
| Missing | 5 |
| VHL mutational status, | |
| WT | 29 |
| MUT | 26 |
| Pathological stage, | |
| T1 | 28 |
| T2 | 9 |
| T3 | 12 |
| Missing | 6 |
| Furhman grade, | |
| I | 6 |
| II | 16 |
| III | 16 |
| IV | 2 |
| Missing | 15 |
VHL mutational status in RCC patients
| Exon | Mutation | Mutation type |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | c. 565C > T; p.E189X | Nonsense |
| 3 | c.481 C > T; p.R161X | Nonsense |
| 1 | c.203C > A; p.S68X | Nonsense |
| 2 | c.345_349delCCTTT; p.G114 fs*15 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c.162 insG; p. M54 fs*12 | Frameshift |
| 2 | c.450delT; p.N150 fs*9 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c. 203_209delCGCGCGA; p. S68 fs*89 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c.215_222delCCAGGTC; p. E70fs*57 | Frameshift |
| 3 | c.502_505delAGCC; p. S168 fs*1 | Frameshift |
| 2 | c.391_394delAACC; p.N131 fs*26 | Frameshift |
| 3 | c.638_639insT; p. D213fs*2 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c.199delA; p.N67Tfs*97 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c.306_314delGCCTGGCA p.P102Pfs*27 | Frameshift |
| 2 | c.411_413 insGT; p. V137Cfs*22 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c.339_340delAG; p.G114 fs*17 | Frameshift |
| 2 | c.444delT; p.F148 fs*11 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c.1101delA; p.V87 fs*47 | Frameshift |
| 1 | c.340G > T; p.G114C | Missense |
| 1 | c.234 T > G; p.N78 K | Missense |
| 3 | c.488 T > A; p.L163H | Missense |
| 1 | c.240 T > A; p.S80R | Missense |
| 1 | c.506C > T; p. L169P | Missense |
| 2 | c.602 T > C; p.L201R | Missense |
| 1 | c.194C > T p.S65 L | Missense |
| 2 | c.IVS2 + 2 T > C | Splicing |
| 2 | c.IVS1–1 G > C | Splicing |
Fig. 1VHL-MUT-RCC patients display higher NK cytotoxicity toward A498, VHL-MUT RCC cell line. NK cell function was evaluated in whole blood through CD107a cell-surface expression and production of IFN-γ in response to ex vivo stimulation with K562, A498 and CAKI-1 cells. Degranulation (CD107a; A, B, C) and cytokine production (IFN-γ; D, E, F) were evaluated after gating on CD3−CD56+ cells. Percent of degranulation was obtained subtracting the percent of degranulation occurring in the absence of target cells. CD107a+NK cells in 12 HD (A), 28 VHL-WT (B) and 23 VHL-MUT (C) RCC patients versus K562, CAKI-1 and A498 renal cell lines. Representative profiles of the percentages of CD107a+NK cells in HD (Ai) VHL-WT (Bi) and VHL-MUT (Ci) RCC patients. IFN-γ production was assayed by intracellular cytokine staining in 8 HD (D), 13 VHL-WT (E) and 14 VHL-MUT (F) RCC patients versus K562, CAKI-1 and A498 renal cell lines. Representative profiles of the percentages of IFN-γ+ NK cells in HD (Di) VHL-WT (Ei) and VHL-MUT (Fi) RCC patients. The results are presented mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired Student t test (p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Isolated NKs from VHL-MUT-RCC patients show higher cytolytic capacity against autologous tumor cells. a-b Flow cytometry plots represent the percent NK cells isolated from 4 RCC patients (#24, #25, #26 VHL-MUT and #29 VHL-WT patients) that express CD107a following no stimulation (NK no target cells) and stimulation with K562, autologous tumor cells, A498 VHL-MUT and SN12C VHL-WT cell lines. Isolated NK cells were activated overnight with IL-2 (100 U/mL). Assays were performed at the indicated effector-target ratio (10E:1 T; 5E:1 T)
Fig. 3Higher NKp46+ cells infiltration and expression of NKp30 and NKp46 in VHL-MUT-RCCs. A Representative tissue staining in VHL-WT (Ai-Aii) and VHL-MUT-RCC patients (Aiii-Aiv) (Magnification 200X detail 400x). B NKp46+ cell densities [NKp46+ cells/mm] in RCC patients grouped in VHL-WT (n = 8) and VHL-MUT (n = 15). The results are presented as mean ± SEM; p = 0.0041, Mann–Whitney test. C-D mRNA expression of NKp30 and NKp46 in 17 VHL-WT and 17 VHL-MUT RCC patients. Transcript levels are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired Student t test (p < 0.05)
Fig. 4Tumor-Tregs from VHL-WT-RCC patients are more suppressive than tumor-Tregs from VHL-MUT-RCC patients. A Percentage of tumor CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+cells (13 VHL-WT-RCCs vs 13 VHL-MUT-RCCs, p = 0.04). (Ai) Representative plots of Tregs from 1 VHL-WT-RCCs vs 1 VHL-MUT-RCCs. B Autologous CFSE-labeled CD4+CD25− T cells were co-cultured with CD4+CD25+ isolated from tumor of 6 VHL-WT and 4 VHL-MUT RCC patients. After 5 days of stimulation with Dynabeads Human T-Activator CD3/CD28, CFSE+CD4+ T cells were analyzed for their proliferation by CFSE dilution. C IFN-γ-tumor-Treg dependent ELISA from 3 VHL-WT vs 3 VHL-MUT RCC patients. D Measurement of TGF-β1 mRNA expression in 6 VHL-WT vs 6 VHL-MUT RCC patients by real-time PCR in tumor and corresponding peritumoral tissues. Relative mRNA expression was calculated according to 2-ΔΔCt method. The results are presented mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired Student t test (p < 0.05)