Literature DB >> 30514122

Visual-graphic symbol acquisition in school age children with developmental and language delays.

Rose A Sevcik1, Andrea Barton-Hulsey1, MaryAnn Romski1, Amy Hyatt Fonseca1.   

Abstract

Augmented language systems have become both an integral component of communication intervention programs for children with severe communicative impairments and spurred research on their language and communication development. This study examined intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may influence the language development process for children with developmental disabilities, by exploring the relationship between varying degrees of symbol arbitrariness and extant speech comprehension skills in the discrimination, learning, and use of symbols for communication. For the study, 13 school-aged participants (M = 8.24 [years; months]), with both developmental and language delays, were provided experience with iconic Blissymbols and an arbitrary symbol set of lexigrams via observational computerized experience sessions. There was a modest difference in their ability to learn arbitrary versus iconic symbols. There were no differences if the vocabulary item was unknown prior to the symbol learning experience. These findings suggest that iconicity of a symbol may not be a critical factor in learning a symbol-referent relationship if a target referent is not yet known in comprehension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iconicity; comprehension; developmental disabilities; graphic symbols; intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30514122      PMCID: PMC7673660          DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1522547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Augment Altern Commun        ISSN: 0743-4618            Impact factor:   2.214


  16 in total

1.  Symbol vocabulary and the focus of conversations: augmenting language development for youth with mental retardation.

Authors:  L B Adamson; M A Romski; K Deffebach; R A Sevcik
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12

2.  Recognition of iconicity doesn't come for free.

Authors:  Laura L Namy
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-11

3.  A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children.

Authors:  Smita Worah; David McNaughton; Janice Light; Elizabeth Benedek-Wood
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.484

4.  A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  P Mirenda; P A Locke
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1989-05

5.  Early lexical development: comprehension and production.

Authors:  H Benedict
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1979-06

6.  Content and context in early lexical development.

Authors:  L S Snyder; E Bates; I Bretherton
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1981-10

7.  Blissymbolics-a nonverbal communication system.

Authors:  L A Archer
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1977-11

Review 8.  Becoming symbol-minded.

Authors:  Judy S Deloache
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Comprehension: an overlooked component in augmented language development.

Authors:  Rose A Sevcik
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 10.  Iconicity in the development of picture skills: typical development and implications for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Jennifer Stephenson
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.