Literature DB >> 30512198

Diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy in Mohs surgery of basal cell carcinomas: a prospective study on 753 margins.

C Longo1,2, R Pampena2, C Bombonato2, S Gardini2, S Piana3, M Mirra2, M Raucci2, A Kyrgidis1, G Pellacani1, M Ragazzi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frozen histological sections are used for intraoperative margin assessment during Mohs surgery. Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is a new tool that offers a promising and faster alternative to frozen histology.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively in a clinical setting the accuracy of FCM vs. frozen sections in margin assessment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC).
METHODS: Patients with BCC scheduled for Mohs surgery were prospectively enrolled. Freshly excised surgical specimens were examined by FCM and then frozen sections were evaluated. Permanent sections were obtained, in order to validate the sample technique. A blind re-evaluation was also performed for discordant cases. Sensitivity and specificity levels, as well as positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), were calculated and receiver-operating characteristic curves generated.
RESULTS: We enrolled 127 BCCs in as many patients (40·2% females). Seven hundred and fifty-three sections were examined. All BCCs were located in the head and neck area. In evaluating the performance of FCM vs. frozen sections, sensitivity was 79·8%, specificity was 95·8%, PPV was 80·5% and NPV was 95·7% [area under the curve 0·88, 95% confidence interval 0·84-0·92 (P < 0·001)]. Forty-nine discordant cases were re-evaluated; 24 were false positive and 25 false negative. The performance of FCM and frozen sections was also evaluated according to the final histopathological assessment.
CONCLUSIONS: We found high levels of accuracy for FCM vs. frozen section evaluation in intraoperative BCC margin assessment during Mohs surgery. Some technical issues prevent the wide use of this technique, but new devices promise to overcome these limitations.
© 2018 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30512198     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  4 in total

1.  Smartphone epifluorescence microscopy for cellular imaging of fresh tissue in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Wenbin Zhu; Giacomo Pirovano; Patrick K O'Neal; Cheng Gong; Nachiket Kulkarni; Christopher D Nguyen; Christian Brand; Thomas Reiner; Dongkyun Kang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Ex vivo confocal microscopy for surgical margin assessment: A histology-compared study on 109 specimens.

Authors:  L Grizzetti; F Kuonen
Journal:  Skin Health Dis       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 3.  Ex Vivo Microscopy: A Promising Next-Generation Digital Microscopy Tool for Surgical Pathology Practice.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Jonathan Quincy Brown; Nicusor Iftimia; Richard M Levenson; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  An international 3-center training and reading study to assess basal cell carcinoma surgical margins with ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Kivanc Kose; Christi Alessi Fox; Anthony Rossi; Manu Jain; Miguel Cordova; Stephen W Dusza; Moira Ragazzi; Stefano Gardini; Elvira Moscarella; Alba Diaz; Ramon Pigem; Salvador Gonzalez; Antoni Bennassar; Cristina Carrera; Caterina Longo; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Kishwer S Nehal
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 1.587

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.