Literature DB >> 30511975

The Architecture of Fat Grafting II: Impact of Cannula Diameter.

Isaac B James1, Debra A Bourne, Gabriella DiBernardo, Sheri S Wang, Jeffrey A Gusenoff, Kacey Marra, J Peter Rubin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fat grafting has emerged as the treatment of choice for soft-tissue augmentation and reconstruction. Variability of volume retention remains the greatest challenge for this technique, often requiring multiple operations to achieve the desired volume. Graft that is placed greater than 2 mm from the recipient bed will undergo necrosis. Improved understanding of the architecture of fat within the recipient bed is paramount to improving outcomes. The impact of cannula diameter on graft architecture is unknown.
METHODS: Fat was harvested by liposuction and stained with methylene blue. Stained fat was grafted into 4 × 2 × 1-cm sections of excised abdominal tissue with 12-, 14-, 16-, and 19-gauge Coleman cannulas at three different volumes: 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 cc. Each tissue block was sectioned for stained graft visualization. The diameter of each deposit and percentage with a radius greater than 2 mm were recorded.
RESULTS: With an injection volume of 0.1 cc, no fat deposits had a radius greater than 2 mm, regardless of cannula size. A graft volume of 0.5 cc created globules greater than 2 mm with larger cannulas (0 percent with 19-gauge, 2.9 percent with 16-gauge, 6.1 percent with 14-gauge, and 4.3 percent with 12-gauge). Injecting 1.0 cc resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of fat parcels expected to undergo central necrosis (16 percent with 19-gauge, 21 percent with 16-gauge, 26 percent with 14-gauge, and 44 percent with 12-gauge).
CONCLUSIONS: Injection cannulas of 14-gauge or larger are more likely to create deposits with dimensions that may be susceptible to central necrosis when injecting 1.0 cc per pass. Smaller cannula sizes or lower volumes per pass should be considered. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30511975     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

Review 1.  Fat Grafting for Hand Rejuvenation.

Authors:  Christopher J Conlon; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Matthew J Davis; Kausar Ali; Sebastian J Winocour; Michael L Eisemann; Julian Winocour
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  "Fasting: An Effective Preconditioning Method to Increase Fat Graft Survival".

Authors:  Han Gyu Cha; Dong Gyu Kim; Jiyeon Chang; Yuri Song; Seongfeel Jeong; Seung Min Nam; Syeo Young Wee; Kae Won Cho; Chang Yong Choi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Fat Graft Size: Relationship Between Cannula and Needle Diameters.

Authors:  Oscar A Vazquez; Moses I Markowitz; Hilton Becker
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-09

Review 4.  Fat Grafting: Basic Science, Techniques, and Patient Management.

Authors:  Orr Shauly; Daniel J Gould; Ashkan Ghavami
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-18

5.  Facial Rejuvenation with Concentrated Lipograft-A 12 Month Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Lukas Prantl; Eva Brix; Sally Kempa; Oliver Felthaus; Andreas Eigenberger; Vanessa Brébant; Alexandra Anker; Catharina Strauss
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.