Literature DB >> 30511037

Systematic review of cure and recurrence rates following minimally invasive parathyroidectomy.

H Ishii1, R Mihai2, J C Watkinson3,4, D S Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) have a single overactive adenoma. Advances in preoperative imaging and surgical adjuncts have given rise to minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP), with lower complication rates in comparison with bilateral neck exploration. Misdiagnosis and undertreatment of multiglandular disease, leading to potentially higher recurrence rates, remains a concern. This study evaluated risks of long-term (1 year or more) recurrence following 'targeted' MIP in PHPT.
METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for studies published between January 2004 and March 2017, looking at long-term outcomes (1 year or more) following targeted MIP for PHPT. English-language studies, with at least 50 patients and a mean follow-up of 1 year, were included.
RESULTS: A total of 5282 patients from 14 studies were included. Overall mean recurrence and cure rates were 1·6 (range 0-3·5) and 96·9 (95·5-100) per cent respectively. Mean follow-up was 33·5 (1-145) months. When intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurements were not done, cure rates were higher (99·3 per cent versus 98·1 per cent with use of intraoperative PTH measurement; P < 0·001) and recurrence rates lower (0·2 versus 1·5 per cent respectively; P < 0·001).
CONCLUSION: Targeted MIP for a presumed single overactive adenoma was associated with very low recurrence rates, without the need for intraoperative PTH measurement when preoperative imaging studies were concordant. Targeted MIP should be encouraged.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30511037      PMCID: PMC6254009          DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJS Open        ISSN: 2474-9842


Introduction

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common condition, with an estimated incidence of one to seven per 1000 adults1. The condition is detected incidentally in more than 80 per cent of subjects on routine biochemical analysis2 3. Surgery remains the only curative option. Parathyroid surgery via an open bilateral four‐gland neck exploration was first performed in 19254 and remained the standard treatment until the early part of the 21st century. In experienced hands, this method has a cure rate of at least 95 per cent, with a morbidity rate of less than 3 per cent5, and does not require any form of preoperative localization imaging. It is widely recognized that in over 85 per cent of patients with PHPT the cause is a single overactive parathyroid adenoma, often identifiable through preoperative imaging, allowing selective removal5. The two most common modalities of preoperative localization are sestamibi imaging and high‐resolution ultrasonography. A meta‐analysis6 examining the value of ultrasound imaging in PHPT found an overall pooled sensitivity of 76·1 per cent and a positive predictive value of 93·2 per cent, although operator and centre variation was acknowledged7. With negative localization of a solitary adenoma, the likelihood of multiglandular disease is reported to be up to 30 per cent8 9. Surgical management of PHPT has evolved over the past 20 years. Rapid intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) assay10, sestamibi scintigraphy and radio‐guided parathyroidectomy11 have emerged, facilitating the development of ‘targeted’ parathyroidectomy techniques based on single‐gland excision via unilateral neck exploration. Various techniques have been described12, 13, 14, 15, with a general consensus that parathyroidectomy is classified as ‘minimally invasive’ when performed with preoperative localization through an incision of less than 2·5–3 cm5 12, 13. Targeted minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) has been shown in large studies, systematic reviews and meta‐analysis to be highly effective with low complication rates compared with open bilateral neck exploration (BNE)14, 15, 16. Advantages of MIP include shorter duration of surgery, lower rates of postoperative hypocalcaemia, less postoperative pain and a smaller scar17. There are also potential financial advantages in performing MIP18 19, with lower operative costs and more rapid hospital discharge. The consensus statement published by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES)20 described MIP as a safe and cost‐effective procedure for the treatment of selected patients with PHPT. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) released guidelines for minimally invasive video‐assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP)21, stating that ‘current evidence on the efficacy and safety of MIVAP is adequate to support the use of this procedure’. Misdiagnosis and the risk of undertreating multigland disease, leading to high recurrence rates, nevertheless remains a potential shortcoming of this approach. This systematic review aimed to examine long‐term (1 year or more) recurrence rates following targeted MIP in PHPT.

Methods

Acquisition of evidence

The PRISMA protocol22 was followed to perform a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the UK Clinical Trials Gateway and the US Trials Database between January 2004 and March 2017. The PICO framework23 was used and terms combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR) to refine the search further. Two independent reviewers identified all studies that met the inclusion criteria for full review. References of the searched studies were evaluated for potential inclusion in the review. Where possible, contact was attempted with authors to verify data that were not clearly described or to confirm that specific data were not available from the study. The study included all articles published between January 2004 and March 2017 that reported MIP alone or comparison with BNE, involving at least 50 patients, where recurrence rates were documented and mean follow‐up was at least 1 year. Parathyroidectomy was considered minimally invasive if the authors documented incision of 3 cm or less, or if MIP was clearly stated. Only articles published in English were considered, and no age limits were set. To analyse the best available data focusing on long‐term (follow‐up of at least 1 year) recurrence and cure rates, the inclusion criterion for centres performing MIP regularly (at least 50 patients per annum) was set. This was done to minimize skewing of data from ‘low‐volume’ centres and small case series.

Study quality and levels of evidence

The quality of studies and risk of bias were assessed by two reviewers. All studies included in the review were non‐randomized, and therefore the Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool24 was used. This tool assessed non‐randomized studies on the following criteria: clearly stated aims, inclusion of consecutive patients, prospective data collection, appropriate endpoints, unbiased evaluation of endpoints, appropriate duration of follow‐up and loss to follow‐up no more than 5 per cent. For comparative studies, further criteria were assessed: whether the control group underwent a standard intervention, the use of contemporary groups, baseline equivalence of the groups, prospective calculation of the sample size and statistical analysis adapted to the study design. To ascertain the level of evidence of the included studies, the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐based Medicine (OCEM)25 guidelines were employed.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was recurrence rate, defined as the rate of hypercalcaemia occurring after 6 months of normocalcaemia following parathyroidectomy. Secondary outcomes were: cure rate (defined as normocalcaemia persisting for more than 6 months after surgery), type of MIP performed, use of IOPTH measurements and postoperative complication rate. When analysing IOPTH use and non‐use during MIP, the studies were divided into those that included only patients who exhibited positive preoperative concordant imaging (PC cohort) and those that included a heterogeneous cohort (H cohort: 1–2 image‐positive or image‐negative patients).

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism® version 7.0d (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA) was used for statistical analysis, and Microsoft Excel® version 16.12 (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) for data handling. The statistical significance of categorical variables was determined with Fisher's exact test. P < 0·050 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study identification

The initial literature search yielded a total of 252 studies, of which 1411 20, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). All studies were observational and included a total of 5282 patients who had targeted MIP for PHPT. There was a female preponderance of 3·4 : 1 and the overall mean age was 58·9 years (Table 1).
Figure 1

PRISMA diagram for the study

Table 1

Summary of included studies

ReferenceReview periodStudy typeNo. of patientsSex ratio (M : F)Age (years)* Mean recurrence rate (%)* Mean cure rate (%)* Follow‐up (months)*
Chen et al.26 1990–2004Retrospective188n.d.60(3)1·199·048
Cohen et al.27 1999–2004Retrospective13932 : 10760(15) (16‐88)0·098·615(12) (3–38)
Barczynski et al.20 2000–2006Prospective11518 : 9757·1(12·2)0·998·328(10) (6–42)
Mihai et al.32 2001–2006Prospective15046 : 10460(16) (17–89)0·099·315(10) (3–48)
Fouquet et al.33 2001–2008Prospective20035 : 16563·1 (13–87)0·598·013(13) (6–72)
Venkat et al.34 2004–2009Prospective20051 : 14958·7(11·9) (13–88)2·597·037(19) (6–72)
Barczyński et al.28 2003–2012Retrospective45557 : 39854·7(15·6) (18–82)2·399·643(16) (12–112)
Chow et al.29 2002–2012Retrospective10529 : 7661·5(14·6)0·0n.d.56·9
Norlén et al.31 1990–2013Retrospective2531593 : 193861·8(13·9)1·895·578 (1–24)
Day et al.35 2003–2013Prospective556147 : 40961·1(13·4)2·097·344 (1–145)
Yang et al.30 2008–2012Retrospective11537 : 7846 (28–57) 0·999·124
Nijhuis et al.37 2000–2013n.d.114n.d.n.d.3·596·534
Thier et al.36 1989–2010Prospective29258 : 23466 (i.q.r. 57–75)0·31 year: 98·560 (1–180)
5 years: 99·4
10 and 15 years: 100
Kim et al.11 2000–2012Retrospective12228 : 9450·8(13)0·099·245·5(42·2)

Values are mean(s.d.) (range) unless indicated otherwise;

values are median (range) unless indicated otherwise. n.d., Not documented.

PRISMA diagram for the study Summary of included studies Values are mean(s.d.) (range) unless indicated otherwise; values are median (range) unless indicated otherwise. n.d., Not documented.

Quality of studies and levels of evidence

Of the 14 studies, seven were retrospective11 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, six involved collection of prospectively identified items20 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and one37 did not clarify the type of study. The median MINORS score was 10 of 16 (mean 9·8, range 6–14) for all studies, and the median of the four comparative studies11 20, 26 28 was 15 of 24 (mean 14·25, range 10–17). According to the OCEM criteria, all of the included studies were classified as individual cohort studies and were therefore classified as having level 2b evidence. The overall mean recurrence rate for the 5282 patients was 1·6 (range 0–3·5) per cent, and the overall cure rate 96·9 (95·5–100) per cent. The overall mean duration of follow‐up for the studies included was 33·5 (1–145) months (Table 1). All studies defined cure as normalization of serum calcium levels, and all recorded serum calcium levels at each follow‐up appointment. All but three studies26 31, 37 also measured postoperative serum PTH levels routinely. All studies used the widely accepted definition of ‘disease recurrence’ as hypercalcaemia after 6 months of proven normocalcaemia following initial surgery. The most common type of surgery performed was the open MIP technique26 27, 29, 30, 31, 32 34, 35, 36, 37, but other approaches included MIVAP20 28, minimally invasive radio‐guided parathyroidectomy11 and a totally endoscopic MIP technique33. When reported, studies had incision lengths of less than 3 cm, whereas studies that did not report on incision length stated that their procedure was ‘minimally invasive’ or a ‘focused/lateral exploration’. Four studies11 29, 31 32 with a total of 2908 patients performed targeted MIP without IOPTH measurements, and nine studies20 26, 27, 28 30, 33, 34, 35, 36 carried out targeted MIP with IOPTH measurements in 2072 of the patients. One study37 made no reference to the use of this test, so was not included in the analysis. Five studies28, 29, 30, 31, 32 included only patients with positive, concordant preoperative localization studies on at least two different imaging modalities, seven11 20, 27 33, 34, 35, 36 included patients regardless of imaging findings, and two26 37 did not report on imaging findings. When IOPTH measurement was not done during MIP, overall mean cure rates were higher (99·3 per cent versus 98·1 per cent when IOPTH measurement was done; P < 0·001) and recurrence rates were lower (0·2 versus 1·5 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) (Table 2).
Table 2

Recurrence and cure rates according to patient cohort and intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement

IOPTH measurementNo IOPTH measurementOverall
Recurrence rate (%)Cure rate (%)No. of patientsRecurrence rate (%)Cure rate (%)No of patientsRecurrence rate (%)Cure rate (%)
Preoperative concordant imaging cohort2·099·55700·299·327860·599·3
Heterogeneous cohort1·395·615020·099·21221·797·7
Overall1·598·120720·299·32908

IOPTH, intraoperative parathyroid hormone.

Recurrence and cure rates according to patient cohort and intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement IOPTH, intraoperative parathyroid hormone. An overall complication rate of 4·4 per cent in 4010 patients was reported in nine studies20 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, whereas five11 26, 35, 36, 37 did not report complication rates. Transient and permanent postoperative hypocalcaemia rates were 1·6 and 0·05 per cent respectively. Temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy occurred in 1·1 per cent and permanent RLN palsy in 0·3 per cent of the 4010 patients. Complications are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3

Complications

No. of complications (n = 176)
Temporary RLN palsy seen on laryngoscopy35 (19·9)
Transient hypocalcaemia defined as < 2 mmol/l23 (13·1)
Transient hypocalcaemia defined as ≤ 1·95 mmol/l23 (13·1)
Hypocalcaemia (NOS)22 (12·5)
Temporary hypoparathyroidism defined as hypocalcaemia (NOS) requiring calcium or vitamin D supplementation, resolving within 6 months17 (9·7)
Other complication (NOS)13 (7·4)
Permanent RLN palsy seen on laryngoscopy11 (6·3)
Wound haematoma requiring return to theatre for evacuation8 (4·5)
Temporary RLN palsy (laryngoscopy use not documented)7 (4·0)
Wound infection4 (2·3)
Myocardial infarction2 (1·1)
Temporary RLN palsy (selective use of laryngoscopy)2 (1·1)
Permanent hypoparathyroidism defined as hypocalcaemia (NOS) requiring calcium or vitamin D supplementation, persisting after 6 months2 (1·1)
Mild neck swelling, managed conservatively1 (0·6)
Transient hypercalcaemia returning to normal1 (0·6)
Wound haematoma, managed conservatively1 (0·6)
Permanent RLN palsy (laryngoscopy use not documented)1 (0·6)
Cerebrovascular accident1 (0·6)
Permanent RLN palsy (selective use of laryngoscopy)1 (0·6)
30‐day mortality not related to surgery1 (0·6)

Values in parentheses are percentages. RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve; NOS, not otherwise specified.

Complications Values in parentheses are percentages. RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve; NOS, not otherwise specified. There were significant differences in how complications were defined and reported. In terms of RLN palsy, four studies20 28, 31 40 routinely used laryngoscopy after surgery, one study29 used laryngoscopy in patients with postoperative dysphonia, and another study30 explicitly stated that laryngoscopy was not used. The remaining publications did not comment on postoperative laryngoscopy. The definition of hypocalcaemia also varied, from a serum calcium level lower than 2 mmol/l28 to 1·95 mmol/l or less30, whereas other studies did not define cut‐off levels.

Discussion

This systematic review has indicated that, despite variations in technique, targeted MIP was associated with low long‐term (at least 1 year) recurrence rates of only about 1·5 per cent. Overall recurrence rates were lowest and cure rates highest in studies that included patients where there was positive, concordant preoperative localization. Interestingly, the analysis suggested that recurrence and cure rates were better when IOPTH measurements were not used. As indicated in Table 2, this appeared to reflect use of MIP without routine IOPTH measurement in patients with concordant imaging. IOPTH measurement seemed to be used more frequently in non‐concordant or image‐negative patients. Two reports38 39 relating to MIP were not included in this systematic review as they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria (mean duration of follow‐up not documented). These studies reported a median follow‐up of 9 (range 0–116) months. The first study38 investigated whether MIP was associated with a higher recurrence rate than BNE, and the second39 considered variables that might predict recurrence in parathyroidectomy for PHPT. In both studies, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed to determine disease‐free estimates for MIP and BNE. No statistically significant differences were found between MIP and open parathyroidectomy in either study (P = 0·55 and P = 0·59 respectively). A meta‐analysis14 of studies comparing focused parathyroidectomy with conventional BNE found that recurrence (odds ratio (OR) 1·08, 95 per cent c.i. 0·59 to 2·00; P = 0·80) and failure (OR 0·88, 0·58 to 1·34; P = 0·56) rates were comparable. Complication rates were significantly lower in the focused parathyroidectomy arm (OR 0·35, 0·15 to 0·84; P = 0·02), predominantly related to a lower risk of transient hypocalcaemia (OR 0·36, 0·14 to 0·90; P = 0·03). The present review is consistent with these findings, with a 1·6 per cent temporary and 0·05 per cent permanent postoperative hypocalcaemia rate after MIP. This review also demonstrated the overall complication rate to be low (4·4 per cent in 4010 patients), and similar to values reported by previous large studies15 40 involving BNE, together with similar rates of permanent and temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0·3 and 1·1 per cent respectively). The lack of postoperative laryngoscopy in the present review and in other studies, however, may mean that the true rate of recurrent nerve palsy is underestimated. Similar consideration applies to rates of postoperative hypocalcaemia, owing to the different cut‐off levels. This systematic review analysed 14 level 2b studies with a median MINORS score of 10 (mean 9·8), indicating evidence of fair quality. However, its main limitation was the lack of uniformity in the presentation and reporting of data by the individual studies. This is a widely recognized and inherent problem of collating data from observational studies. Despite these shortcomings, targeted MIP in the surgical management of patients with a presumed single overactive parathyroid adenoma is a safe technique that provides long‐term cure. The review also suggests that MIP is effective without intraoperative hormone estimations in patients with preoperative concordant imaging.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  36 in total

1.  Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

Authors:  Karem Slim; Emile Nini; Damien Forestier; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Yves Panis; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  The superiority of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy based on 1650 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Robert Udelsman; Zhenqiu Lin; Patricia Donovan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  First parathyroid surgeon: Sir John Bland-Sutton and the parathyroids.

Authors:  Leigh W Delbridge; Fausto F Palazzo
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 4.  Focused Versus Bilateral Parathyroid Exploration for Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcel Jinih; Emer O'Connell; Donal P O'Leary; Aaron Liew; Henry P Redmond
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Understanding financial conflicts of interest.

Authors:  D F Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Does intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone assay improve the results of parathyroidectomy?

Authors:  Daishu Miura; Nobuyuki Wada; Cumhur Arici; Eugene Morita; Quan-Yang Duh; Orlo H Clark
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Incision length for standard thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy: when is it minimally invasive?

Authors:  Laurent Brunaud; Rasa Zarnegar; Nobuyuki Wada; Philip Ituarte; Orlo H Clark; Quan-Yang Duh
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-10

8.  Is minimally invasive parathyroidectomy associated with greater recurrence compared to bilateral exploration? Analysis of more than 1,000 cases.

Authors:  David F Schneider; Haggi Mazeh; Rebecca S Sippel; Herbert Chen
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Negative preoperative localization studies are highly predictive of multiglandular disease in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Frederic Sebag; Johnathan G H Hubbard; Sylvie Maweja; Claudia Misso; Laurent Tardivet; Jean-Francois Henry
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Is focused parathyroidectomy appropriate for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism?

Authors:  Won Woong Kim; Yumie Rhee; Eun Jeong Ban; Cho Rok Lee; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.859

View more
  4 in total

1.  Surgical management of MILD hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Adèle Lecourt; Gwenaëlle Creff; Paul Coudert; Olivier De Crouy Chanel; Pascal Guggenbuhl; Franck Jegoux
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Selection of parathyroidectomy methods for primary hyperparathyroidism according to concordance between ultrasonography and MIBI scan results.

Authors:  Won Woong Kim; Yu-Mi Lee; Tae-Yon Sung; Ki-Wook Chung; Suck Joon Hong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

Review 3.  A Review of Parathyroid Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism from the United Kingdom Registry of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS).

Authors:  H Ishii; M J Stechman; J C Watkinson; S Aspinall; D S Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Radiofrequency Ablation of Parathyroid Adenoma: A Novel Treatment Option for Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Iram Hussain; Shahzad Ahmad; Jules Aljammal
Journal:  AACE Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-01-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.