Claire C Young1, Ryan M Baker2, Christopher J Howlett3, Todd Hryciw4, Joshua E Herman5, Douglas Higgs6, Richard Gibbons6, Howard Crawford7, Arthur Brown8, Christopher L Pin9. 1. Department of Paediatrics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Paediatrics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. 5. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. 6. MRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 7. Molecular & Integrative Physiology and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 8. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada; Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. 9. Department of Paediatrics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: cpin@uwo.ca.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer death in North America, accounting for >30,000 deaths annually. Although somatic activating mutations in KRAS appear in 97% of PDAC patients, additional factors are required to initiate PDAC. Because mutations in genes encoding chromatin remodelling proteins have been implicated in KRAS-mediated PDAC, we investigated whether loss of chromatin remodeler ɑ-thalassemia, mental-retardation, X-linked (ATRX) affects oncogenic KRAS's ability to promote PDAC. ATRX affects DNA replication, repair, and gene expression and is implicated in other cancers including glioblastomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The hypothesis was that deletion of Atrx in pancreatic acinar cells will increase susceptibility to injury and oncogenic KRAS. Methods: Mice allowing conditional loss of Atrx within pancreatic acinar cells were examined after induction of recurrent cerulein-induced pancreatitis or oncogenic KRAS (KRAS G12D ). Histologic, biochemical, and molecular analysis examined pancreatic pathologies up to 2 months after induction of Atrx deletion. Results: Mice lacking Atrx showed more progressive damage, inflammation, and acinar-to-duct cell metaplasia in response to injury relative to wild-type mice. In combination with KRASG12D, Atrx-deficient acinar cells showed increased fibrosis, inflammation, progression to acinar-to-duct cell metaplasia, and pre-cancerous lesions relative to mice expressing only KRASG12D. This sensitivity appears only in female mice, mimicking a significant prevalence of ATRX mutations in human female PDAC patients. Conclusions: Our results indicate the absence of ATRX increases sensitivity to injury and oncogenic KRAS only in female mice. This is an instance of a sex-specific mutation that enhances oncogenic KRAS's ability to promote pancreatic intraepithelial lesion formation.
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer death in North America, accounting for >30,000 deaths annually. Although somatic activating mutations in KRAS appear in 97% of PDACpatients, additional factors are required to initiate PDAC. Because mutations in genes encoding chromatin remodelling proteins have been implicated in KRAS-mediated PDAC, we investigated whether loss of chromatin remodeler ɑ-thalassemia, mental-retardation, X-linked (ATRX) affects oncogenic KRAS's ability to promote PDAC. ATRX affects DNA replication, repair, and gene expression and is implicated in other cancers including glioblastomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The hypothesis was that deletion of Atrx in pancreatic acinar cells will increase susceptibility to injury and oncogenic KRAS. Methods:Mice allowing conditional loss of Atrx within pancreatic acinar cells were examined after induction of recurrent cerulein-induced pancreatitis or oncogenic KRAS (KRASG12D ). Histologic, biochemical, and molecular analysis examined pancreatic pathologies up to 2 months after induction of Atrx deletion. Results:Mice lacking Atrx showed more progressive damage, inflammation, and acinar-to-duct cell metaplasia in response to injury relative to wild-type mice. In combination with KRASG12D, Atrx-deficient acinar cells showed increased fibrosis, inflammation, progression to acinar-to-duct cell metaplasia, and pre-cancerous lesions relative to mice expressing only KRASG12D. This sensitivity appears only in female mice, mimicking a significant prevalence of ATRX mutations in human female PDACpatients. Conclusions: Our results indicate the absence of ATRX increases sensitivity to injury and oncogenic KRAS only in female mice. This is an instance of a sex-specific mutation that enhances oncogenic KRAS's ability to promote pancreatic intraepithelial lesion formation.
See editorial on page 233.Female mice lacking ATRX in the pancreas have increased sensitivity to pancreatic cancer, whereas male mice without ATRX are protected. This study identifies such susceptibility in pancreatic cancer and highlights the need for sex-specific approaches in cancer treatment.Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in North America, with a 5-year survival rate of ∼9% (Pancreatic Cancer Facts, PANCAN). PDAC is characterized by increased genomic instability, a poor response to chemotherapeutic intervention, and often diagnosed at later stages because of a lack of clinical symptoms and poor diagnostic markers even for susceptible populations. During the last 10 years, elegant lineage tracing studies identified acinar cells as the cell of origin in many PDAC cases.2, 3, 4 In these cases, the initiating events include acinar-to-duct cell metaplasia (ADM), in which mature acinar cells transiently revert to a pancreatic progenitor-like state, increasing the potential for progression to neoplastic lesions termed pancreatic intraepithelial lesions (PanINs) and PDAC.2, 5Mutations in KRAS that lead to a constitutively active form of the protein are a hallmark of PDAC, present in 97% of cases. However, the constitutive activation of KRAS alone appears to be insufficient to drive PDAC progression, and additional acquired mutations and/or pancreatic injury are required.1, 6, 7 Recent molecular characterization of PDACtumors has identified 4 subtypes for PDAC and mutations that define 10 pathways commonly affected in these tumors. In addition to identifying RAS and NOTCH signaling as key oncogenic pathways, somatic mutations in genes involved in chromatin remodeling and SWI/SNF function were identified. Studies using genetically modified mouse strains harboring null alleles for the chromatin remodeling proteins brahma-related gene 1 or B-cell specific Moloney virus insertion site 1 increased and decreased, respectively, the ability for oncogenic KRAS to promote PDAC progression. These studies confirm the importance of maintaining chromosome organization/integrity in preventing KRAS-mediated oncogenic progression. Our goal was to explore the idea that other components that contribute to SWI/SNF function and genome integrity may be functionally linked to oncogenic KRAS activity in promoting PDAC.ATRX (ɑ-thalassemia, mental-retardation, X-linked) is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins and interacts with death associated protein 6 (DAXX) to maintain or remodel appropriate nucleosome organization within the genome.11, 12 In addition to its role in chromatin remodeling, studies have identified roles for ATRX in maintaining genomic stability, maintaining proper DNA replication and repair, and affecting gene expression. It has been proposed that ATRX-dependent deposition of histone variant H3.3 prevents the formation of alternative DNA structures during replication, allowing for proper facilitation of the replicative process.15, 16 Complete loss of ATRX function during development is lethal, but hypomorphic ATRX mutations are the underlying cause for ATRX syndrome, a developmental disorder in males involving significant cognitive impairment, facial abnormalities, and development of ɑ-thalassemia. More recently, somatic mutations in ATRX have been identified in a number of cancers including glioblastomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.19, 20, 21, 22To date, the role of ATRX in the adult pancreas or PDAC has not been examined. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ATRX deletion on pancreatic injury and oncogenic KRAS-mediated PDAC progression. We generated mouse lines in which exon 18 of the mouseATRX gene could be conditionally deleted in pancreatic acinar cells on its own or in combination with activation of oncogenic KRAS. Our results showed that loss of ATRX alters the response to recurrent pancreatic injury, suggesting a role for ATRX in the repair and regeneration of acinar tissue after pancreatic insult. Furthermore, combination of Atrx deletion with oncogenic KRAS activation significantly enhanced pancreatic damage within 2 months relative to oncogenic KRAS alone. Surprisingly, this ability to sensitize the pancreatic acinar cells to the oncogenic action of mutated KRAS was observed exclusively in female mice. These results indicate that ATRX loss cooperates with activated KRAS to promote pancreatic disease in a sex-specific manner.
Results
To determine whether ATRX deletion affected the phenotype of mature acinar cells, Atrxmice were mated to mice expressing creERT from the Mist1 locus (Mist1; Figure 1A), allowing for acinar-specific deletion in the pancreas.24, 25 Deletion of exon 18 results in complete loss of ATRX, likely because of mRNA instability. A shorter isoform of ATRX may still be expressed, but this truncated form lacks the SWI/SNF domain. Tamoxifen was administered to 2- to 4-month-old mice, and ATRX accumulation was assessed 7, 35, or 60 days after dosing (Figure 1B and C). Immunofluorescence analysis confirmed 98% of acinar cells were ATRX-negative at all time points, demonstrating efficient Atrx deletion and indicating mature acinar cells do not require ATRX for maintained viability (Figure 1C). Co-immunofluorescence for ATRX and insulin and identification of duct nuclei based on morphology confirmed Atrx deletion specifically in acinar cells (Figure 1D).
Figure 1
Loss of ATRX in the pancreas is specific to acinar cells. (Atrx mice carrying loxP sites that flank exon 18. CreERT is expressed from the Mist1 promoter. On tamoxifen administration to Mist1Atrx mice, cre recombinase becomes localized to the nucleus and produces deletion of exon 18 of the Atrx gene. This leads to degradation of full-length Atrx mRNA. (B) Immunofluorescence for ATRX in pancreatic tissue from Mist1 (WT) mice 7, 35, or 60 days after tamoxifen gavage in Mist1Atrx mice (Atrx). White arrows indicate residual ATRX expression. Magnification bars = 25 μm. (C) Atrx deletion efficiency was quantified as the percentage of acinar cells lacking ATRX (n = 3 for all groups). (D) Localization of insulin (green) and ATRX (red) by co-immunofluorescence (IF) demonstrates acinar-specific knockout of ATRX expression in Mist1Atrx mice 20 days after tamoxifen treatment. White arrows indicate ATRX expression in pancreatic duct cells. Sections were counterstained with DAPI to reveal nuclei. Magnification bar = 50 μm.
Loss of ATRX in the pancreas is specific to acinar cells. (Atrxmice carrying loxP sites that flank exon 18. CreERT is expressed from the Mist1 promoter. On tamoxifen administration to Mist1Atrxmice, cre recombinase becomes localized to the nucleus and produces deletion of exon 18 of the Atrx gene. This leads to degradation of full-length Atrx mRNA. (B) Immunofluorescence for ATRX in pancreatic tissue from Mist1 (WT) mice 7, 35, or 60 days after tamoxifen gavage in Mist1Atrxmice (Atrx). White arrows indicate residual ATRX expression. Magnification bars = 25 μm. (C) Atrx deletion efficiency was quantified as the percentage of acinar cells lacking ATRX (n = 3 for all groups). (D) Localization of insulin (green) and ATRX (red) by co-immunofluorescence (IF) demonstrates acinar-specific knockout of ATRX expression in Mist1Atrxmice 20 days after tamoxifen treatment. White arrows indicate ATRX expression in pancreatic duct cells. Sections were counterstained with DAPI to reveal nuclei. Magnification bar = 50 μm.Histologic analysis showed no obvious phenotypes regarding disorganization of acinar cells or injury/inflammation (Figure 2A), although intralobular adipocytes were observed at a higher frequency in Mist1Atrxmice. Because loss of ATRX showed limited effects on overall pancreatic morphology, we focused specifically on the 60-day time point to determine whether any phenotypes occurred in response to loss of ATRX. Immunofluorescence analysis for proliferative markers Ki67 (Figure 2B) and pH3 (data not shown) or TUNEL analysis (Figure 2C) revealed increased numbers of proliferating and apoptotic cells after ATRX deletion. Because ATRX is involved in double stranded (ds) DNA repair,14, 27 we examined γH2AX accumulation, a marker for unresolved dsDNA breaks. Mist1Atrxpancreatic tissue showed an increase in the number of cells accumulating γH2AX (Figure 2D), suggesting loss of ATRX leads to an inability to resolve dsDNA breaks. These results suggest that short-term loss of ATRX in pancreatic acini has no overt consequences on pancreatic morphology but may increase susceptibility to events that require intact DNA repair pathways, such as pancreatic injury.
Figure 2
Mature acinar cells do not require ATRX for maintenance, but ATRX loss induces low levels of pancreatic damage. (A) Representative H&E staining of Mist1 (WT) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) pancreatic tissue 60 days after last tamoxifen gavage. Intralobular adipocytes are indicated by *. (B–D) Representative images and quantification for (B) Ki67 immunofluorescence (Mist1 [WT; n = 4]; Mist1Atrx [ATRX–; n = 5]), (C) TUNEL (Mist1, n = 9; Mist1Atrx, n = 10), or (D) γH2AX IF (Mist1 [n = 7]; Mist1Atrx [n = 11]) 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. White arrows indicate positive cells. Magnification bar = 50 μm. Data were assessed by using two-tailed t test with Tukey post hoc test. Error bars represent means ± standard error; *P < .005.
Mature acinar cells do not require ATRX for maintenance, but ATRX loss induces low levels of pancreatic damage. (A) Representative H&E staining of Mist1 (WT) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) pancreatic tissue 60 days after last tamoxifen gavage. Intralobular adipocytes are indicated by *. (B–D) Representative images and quantification for (B) Ki67 immunofluorescence (Mist1 [WT; n = 4]; Mist1Atrx [ATRX–; n = 5]), (C) TUNEL (Mist1, n = 9; Mist1Atrx, n = 10), or (D) γH2AX IF (Mist1 [n = 7]; Mist1Atrx [n = 11]) 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. White arrows indicate positive cells. Magnification bar = 50 μm. Data were assessed by using two-tailed t test with Tukey post hoc test. Error bars represent means ± standard error; *P < .005.To examine this possibility, Mist1 and Mist1Atrxmice were subjected to recurrent pancreatic injury for 11 days and allowed to recover for 3 days. We chose a mild dosing regimen so damage in control mice would be limited. No significant differences were observed between Mist1 and Mist1Atrxmice based on body weight, behavior, or gross tissue morphology 3 days after cessation of cerulein (data not shown). However, histologic analysis showed marked differences between the 2 genotypes in response to cerulein treatment. As expected, cerulein-treated Mist1mice show intra-acinar edema but no evidence of inflammation or fibrosis (Figure 3A), likely because of the mild nature of the cerulein treatment. Conversely, cerulein-treated Mist1Atrxmice showed increased damage (Figure 3A) and fibrosis in female Mist1Atrxmice relative to controls (Figure 3B and C), as indicated by H&E and trichrome histology, respectively. This enhanced cellular damage was further confirmed by the strong immunofluorescence signal for F4/80 antigen that was indicative of extensive macrophage infiltration in Mist1Atrxmice relative to controls (Figure 3D). Quantification of the tissue damage confirmed increased sensitivity to recurrent cerulein induced pancreatitis (CIP) and indicated that female Mist1Atrxmice are clearly more sensitive than male mice to these effects (Figure 3C, Table 2). Whereas analysis of acinar cell death by cleaved caspase-3 showed no difference between genotypes (Figure 4A), notably enhanced cell turnover based on cleaved caspase-3 (Figure 4B) or proliferative capacity by Ki67 staining (Figure 5E) was observed in Mist1Atrx pancreata in areas showing classic features of ADM after CIP. No such areas of ADM were observed in Mist1mice (Table 2).
Figure 3
Loss of ATRX sensitizes acinar tissue to recurrent pancreatic injury 3 days after cessation of pancreatic injury. (A) H&E staining of saline or cerulein (CIP) treated Mist1 (WT) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice. CIP-treated Mist1 mice show vacuolation and intra-acinar edema relative to saline-treated mice. CIP-treated Mist1Atrx mice demonstrated increased damage (black arrows) and putative ADM (white arrows) relative to CIP-treated Mist1 mice. Magnification bar = 50 μm. (B) Trichrome stain of Mist1 and Mist1Atrx tissue indicating fibrosis. Mist1Atrx mice exhibit increased fibrosis (black arrow) and to a greater extent in female Mist1Atrx mice. Magnification bar = 100 μm. (C) Quantification of fibrosis in pancreatic tissue from Mist1 (WT) mice treated with saline (n = 4 female or 3 male) or cerulein (n = 4 female or 5 male) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice treated with saline (n = 5 female or 3 male) or cerulein (n = 5 female and male). Male mice are denoted as black symbols and female mice as red symbols. Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Error bars represent means ± standard error. When not considering sex (upper graph), no significant differences exist between groups. When sex of the mouse is considered (lower graph), female CIP-treated Mist1Atrx mice are significantly different than all groups (*P < .05 vs all male mouse groups; **P < .01 vs female Mist1 and Mist1Atrx saline-treated and female Mist1 CIP-treated groups). Individual animals are denoted with black (male) or red (female) markers. (D) Representative immunofluorescent images of F4/80 accumulation in CIP-treated female Mist1 and Mist1Atrx tissue (repeated 3 times). Arrows indicate macrophages. Sections were counterstained with DAPI. Magnification bar = 70 μm.
Table 2
Morphometric Analysis of Pancreatic Tissue After Recurrent Pancreatic Damage
Male
Female
Mist1creERT/+ (5)
Mist1creERT/+AtrxflΔ18(5)
Mist1creERT/+ (4)
Mist1creERT/+AtrxflΔ18 (5)
Fibrosis
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
1.4 ± 0.51
Inflammation
0.2 ± 0.20
1.4 ± 0.25
0.75 ± 0.25
2.4 ± 0.40
ADM
0 ± 0
0.6 ± 0.25
0 ± 0
1.2 ± 0.37
Total
0.2 ± 0.2
2.0 ± 0.45
0.75 ± 0.25
5.0 ± 1.1a
NOTE. (#) indicates n value; see methodology for scoring. Histopathologic assessment of pancreatic damage, as indicated by 3 factors: fibrosis, inflammation, and presence of ADM. Scores are represented on a grading scale from 0 to 4. Superscript letter “a” indicates groups that are statistically different (P < .01). Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test.
Figure 4
pancreatic tissue shows increased apoptosis after recurrent CIP treatment. (A) Acinar cell–specific cleaved caspase-3 comparing Mist1 (WT) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) pancreatic tissue after saline (SAL) or cerulein (CIP) treatment. Quantification in pancreatic tissue from Mist1 (WT) mice treated with saline (n = 4 female or 3 male) or cerulein (n = 4 female or 5 male) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice treated with saline (n = 5 female or 4 male) or cerulein (n = 5 female and male). Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Error bars represent means ± standard error. (B) Immunohistochemistry for cleaved caspase-3 in male and female Mist1 (WT) or Mist1Atrx pancreatic tissue 3 days after cessation of cerulein treatment. Arrows indicate apoptotic cells. Magnification bar = 50 μm.
Figure 5
pancreatic tissue shows reduced regeneration after recurrent CIP treatment. Tissue was examined 3 days after cessation of recurrent CIP treatment. (A) Western blot analysis for CPA, amylase, SOX9, and total ERK1/2 (tERK1/2; loading control). Increased accumulation of digestive enzymes was observed specifically in Mist1 (WT) mice, whereas Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice did not demonstrate similar accumulation. (B) Serum amylase levels in mice (n = 3–4 for each group). Data were assessed by using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Bars represent mean ± standard error. No significant difference in body weight or amylase levels was observed between genotypes. (C) Immunohistochemistry for CPA in Mist1 or Mist1Atrx mice. CPA accumulation was decreased in female Mist1Atrx mice (acinus is indicated by dotted line). (D) Representative immunofluorescence for SOX9 (green) expression was increased in male Mist1Atrx and female Mist1Atrx tissue (white arrows). Magnification bars = 50 μm. (E) Higher magnification images show SOX9 expression in duct, putative ADM (white arrows), and acinar cell (yellow arrowheads). Sections were co-stained for Ki-67 (red arrowheads) and counterstained with DAPI.
Loss of ATRX sensitizes acinar tissue to recurrent pancreatic injury 3 days after cessation of pancreatic injury. (A) H&E staining of saline or cerulein (CIP) treated Mist1 (WT) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice. CIP-treated Mist1mice show vacuolation and intra-acinar edema relative to saline-treated mice. CIP-treated Mist1Atrxmice demonstrated increased damage (black arrows) and putative ADM (white arrows) relative to CIP-treated Mist1mice. Magnification bar = 50 μm. (B) Trichrome stain of Mist1 and Mist1Atrx tissue indicating fibrosis. Mist1Atrxmice exhibit increased fibrosis (black arrow) and to a greater extent in female Mist1Atrxmice. Magnification bar = 100 μm. (C) Quantification of fibrosis in pancreatic tissue from Mist1 (WT) mice treated with saline (n = 4 female or 3 male) or cerulein (n = 4 female or 5 male) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice treated with saline (n = 5 female or 3 male) or cerulein (n = 5 female and male). Male mice are denoted as black symbols and female mice as red symbols. Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Error bars represent means ± standard error. When not considering sex (upper graph), no significant differences exist between groups. When sex of the mouse is considered (lower graph), female CIP-treated Mist1Atrxmice are significantly different than all groups (*P < .05 vs all male mouse groups; **P < .01 vs female Mist1 and Mist1Atrxsaline-treated and female Mist1CIP-treated groups). Individual animals are denoted with black (male) or red (female) markers. (D) Representative immunofluorescent images of F4/80 accumulation in CIP-treated female Mist1 and Mist1Atrx tissue (repeated 3 times). Arrows indicate macrophages. Sections were counterstained with DAPI. Magnification bar = 70 μm.Histology Grading CriteriaNOTE. Grading of pancreatic lesions: pancreatic lesions (ranging from ADM to PanIN grade 3) were quantified and classified into the following categories: ADM, PanIN grade 1, PanIN grade 2, PanIN grade 3, or PDAC based on morphologic characteristics including cell shape (cuboidal or columnar), presence of mucin accumulation, nuclear atypia, pseudostratification, and papillary or cribriform structure.Morphometric Analysis of Pancreatic Tissue After Recurrent Pancreatic DamageNOTE. (#) indicates n value; see methodology for scoring. Histopathologic assessment of pancreatic damage, as indicated by 3 factors: fibrosis, inflammation, and presence of ADM. Scores are represented on a grading scale from 0 to 4. Superscript letter “a” indicates groups that are statistically different (P < .01). Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test.pancreatic tissue shows increased apoptosis after recurrent CIP treatment. (A) Acinar cell–specific cleaved caspase-3 comparing Mist1 (WT) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) pancreatic tissue after saline (SAL) or cerulein (CIP) treatment. Quantification in pancreatic tissue from Mist1 (WT) mice treated with saline (n = 4 female or 3 male) or cerulein (n = 4 female or 5 male) and Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice treated with saline (n = 5 female or 4 male) or cerulein (n = 5 female and male). Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Error bars represent means ± standard error. (B) Immunohistochemistry for cleaved caspase-3 in male and female Mist1 (WT) or Mist1Atrxpancreatic tissue 3 days after cessation of cerulein treatment. Arrows indicate apoptotic cells. Magnification bar = 50 μm.pancreatic tissue shows reduced regeneration after recurrent CIP treatment. Tissue was examined 3 days after cessation of recurrent CIP treatment. (A) Western blot analysis for CPA, amylase, SOX9, and total ERK1/2 (tERK1/2; loading control). Increased accumulation of digestive enzymes was observed specifically in Mist1 (WT) mice, whereas Mist1Atrx (Atrx) mice did not demonstrate similar accumulation. (B) Serum amylase levels in mice (n = 3–4 for each group). Data were assessed by using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Bars represent mean ± standard error. No significant difference in body weight or amylase levels was observed between genotypes. (C) Immunohistochemistry for CPA in Mist1 or Mist1Atrxmice. CPA accumulation was decreased in female Mist1Atrxmice (acinus is indicated by dotted line). (D) Representative immunofluorescence for SOX9 (green) expression was increased in male Mist1Atrx and female Mist1Atrx tissue (white arrows). Magnification bars = 50 μm. (E) Higher magnification images show SOX9 expression in duct, putative ADM (white arrows), and acinar cell (yellow arrowheads). Sections were co-stained for Ki-67 (red arrowheads) and counterstained with DAPI.Tissue histology also revealed a notable increase in ADM in Mist1Atrx tissue based on the appearance of tubular complexes (Figure 3B). Western blot analysis (Figure 5A) for mature acinar cell markers amylase and pro-carboxypeptidase (CPA) confirmed a different response to recurrent CIP in Mist1Atrxmice. Cerulein-treated Mist1mice exhibited increased accumulation of amylase and CPA compared with saline-treated controls, which was indicative of a regenerative response to injury. However, Mist1Atrxmice did not show this recovery from injury (Figure 5A). This difference in enzyme accumulation was not due to increased release of enzymes in response to injury because circulating levels of amylase were not significantly different between genotypes (Figure 5B). Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed decreased CPA accumulation in both putative ADM as well as surrounding acinar cells (Figure 5C). Surprisingly, this decrease in CPA accumulation appeared to be more dramatic in cerulein-treated female Mist1Atrxmice. Acini (delineated by a dotted line) show limited CPA accumulation in tissue sections from female mice (Figure 5C). We next examined expression of the progenitor/duct cell marker SOX9, a transcription factor that increases during regeneration and is required for ADM. In adult pancreatic tissue, SOX9 is expressed only in a subset of duct and centroacinar cells,4, 28 which we confirmed by immunofluorescence on sections from saline-treated and cerulein-treated Mist1mice (Figure 5D and E). Conversely, increased SOX9 nuclear accumulation was observed in female and male Mist1Atrxpancreatic tissue specifically after CIP treatment (Figure 5D), accumulating in ADM and some acinar cells (Figure 5D and E). Taken together, these data suggest loss of ATRX increased the sensitivity of acinar cells to recurrent cerulein exposure.These findings suggest that Mist1Atrxmice will have increased susceptibility to oncogenic properties of mutated KRAS, because maintenance of the acinar phenotype constrains KRAS-induced transformation.5, 9, 29 Therefore, we next introduced an inducible form of oncogenic KRAS (Kras) into the Mist1Atrx genotype (Mist1KrasAtrx hereafter referred to as MKA; Figure 6A). Cre-mediated induction of KRAS +/- deletion of Atrx was initiated in 2- to 4-month-old congenic Mist1, Mist1Atrx, Mist1Kras, and MKA mice (Figure 6B), and acinar cell–specific loss of ATRX was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (Figure 6C). No significant differences were observed in body weight between groups during the course of the experiment (Figure 6D), and assessment of serum amylase levels at the time of death revealed no differences between genotypes (Figure 6E). Because of the presence of oral squamous papilloma tumors in KRASG12D-expressing mice, the experiment was terminated at 60 days after tamoxifen administration (data not shown). Gross morphologic examination revealed enlarged spleens in female Mist1Kras and MKA mice (Figure 7).
Figure 6
Induction of oncogenic KRAS with (A) Schematic of Atrx-deficient mouse model with oncogenic KRAS activation. (B) Experimental timeline for tamoxifen gavage in congenic Mist1, Mist1Atrx, Mist1Kras, and MKA mice. Names used for each line within the figures are depicted in bold. (C) Immunohistochemistry for ATRX in acinar (black arrow) and duct (red arrow) cells of Mist1 and Mist1Atrx mice, ATRX expression is limited to islet (open arrow; delineated by dotted line) and duct cells (red arrow). (D) Change in body weight (%) of mice after Atrx deletion ± oncogenic KRAS activation. Mouse genotypes include Mist1 (WT; n = 13), Mist1Atrx (Atrx; n = 12), Mist1Kras (Kras; n = 17), and MKA (n = 16). Points are represented as mean weight ± standard error. (E) Serum amylase levels in WT (n = 7 male or 3 female), Atrx (n = 7 male or 5 female), Kras (n = 6 male or 5 female), and MKA (n = 8 male or 6 female) mice 60 days after Atrx deletion ± oncogenic KRAS activation. Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Bars represent mean ± standard error.
Figure 7
Gross morphology does not reveal significant differences on dissection.Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), or MKA mice. Although female MKA mice may show some edema, the only easily identified difference is splenomegaly (*), which consistently appeared in Mist1Kras and MKA mice.
Induction of oncogenic KRAS with (A) Schematic of Atrx-deficient mouse model with oncogenic KRAS activation. (B) Experimental timeline for tamoxifen gavage in congenic Mist1, Mist1Atrx, Mist1Kras, and MKA mice. Names used for each line within the figures are depicted in bold. (C) Immunohistochemistry for ATRX in acinar (black arrow) and duct (red arrow) cells of Mist1 and Mist1Atrxmice, ATRX expression is limited to islet (open arrow; delineated by dotted line) and duct cells (red arrow). (D) Change in body weight (%) of mice after Atrx deletion ± oncogenic KRAS activation. Mouse genotypes include Mist1 (WT; n = 13), Mist1Atrx (Atrx; n = 12), Mist1Kras (Kras; n = 17), and MKA (n = 16). Points are represented as mean weight ± standard error. (E) Serum amylase levels in WT (n = 7 male or 3 female), Atrx (n = 7 male or 5 female), Kras (n = 6 male or 5 female), and MKA (n = 8 male or 6 female) mice 60 days after Atrx deletion ± oncogenic KRAS activation. Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Bars represent mean ± standard error.Gross morphology does not reveal significant differences on dissection.Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), or MKA mice. Although female MKA mice may show some edema, the only easily identified difference is splenomegaly (*), which consistently appeared in Mist1Kras and MKA mice.Histologic examination revealed normal pancreatic morphology in Mist1 and Mist1Atrxmice (Figure 8A). Mist1Krasmice also showed typical pancreatic morphology for the most part, with a few instances of ADM or PanINs (Figure 8A). This is consistent with previous reports that activation of oncogenic KRASG12D in mature acinar cells was insufficient on its own to cause widespread pancreatic damage. Conversely, MKA mice demonstrated a variable phenotype based on sex (Figure 8A). Male MKA mice (n = 10) appeared phenotypically normal with negligible PanIN formation and few pockets of fibrosis relative to Mist1Krasmice. Conversely, all female MKA mice (n = 6) developed PanINs and fibrosis, with some mice displaying extensive inflammation and fibrosis, along with disruptions in acinar cell organization consistent with a chronic pancreatitis phenotype (Figure 8A). Trichrome staining confirmed increased fibrosis only in female MKA pancreatic tissue relative to Mist1Krasmice (Figure 9A), and Alcian blue histology confirmed increases in neoplastic PanIN lesions (Figure 9B). The tissue showed significant variability in fibrosis between mice in both MKA and Mist1Kras cohorts (Figure 9C), although female MKA mice in general had increased damage (MKA = 15.2% ± 9.2% damaged area vs Mist1Kras = 5.0% ± 1.6%), whereas male MKA mice had decreased damage (MKA = 0.2% ± 0.2% vs Mist1Kras = 5.8% ± 3.8%). On the basis of a 2-way ANOVA, no significant differences were observed between any group regarding damaged (ie, lesion) area. However, quantification of lesion type (Figure 9D) indicated significantly more pre-cancerous lesions develop in female MKA mice relative to all groups except Mist1Kras male mice. Quantification of overall pancreatic fibrosis, inflammation, and ADM, as described earlier, confirmed increased injury in MKA females relative to Mist1Kras counterparts (Table 3).
Figure 8
Loss of ATRX enhances KRAS’s ability to promote pre-cancerous lesions in female mice. (A) H&E images of pancreatic tissue from male and female Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), and MKA mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Arrows indicate focal ADM or PanIN lesions. Dotted white line delineates significant lesion area from acinar tissue. Islets are indicated by I. Magnification bar = 200 μm. (B) Average percentage of lobules containing at least one instance of ADM, PanIN1, or PanIN2 in Kras (n = 7 male or 10 female) and MKA (n = 10 male or 6 female) mice. Data were assessed by using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Representative examples of ADM, PanIN1, and PanIN2 lesions from female MKA mice. Magnification bars = 50 μm.
Figure 9
Histology of pancreatic tissue after Representative (A) trichrome or (B) Alcian blue images of pancreatic tissue from male and female Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), and MKA mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Increased tissue fibrosis was routinely observed in MKA females (arrows). Magnification bar = 200 μm. Increased fibrosis (open arrow) and duct metaplasia are observed in female MKA tissue. Quantification of (C) damaged area as percentage of total pancreatic area based on appearance of PanINs or fibrosis, or (D) number of ADM and PanINs (lesions) observed within Mist1 (WT; n = 8 male or 5 female), Mist1Atrx (Atrx; n = 8 male or 5 female), Mist1Kras (Kras; n = 7 male or 10 female), and MKA (n = 10 male or 6 female) mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Number of ADM and PanINs (lesions) was significantly increased in MKA females compared with all other groups except male Mist1Kras (Kras) mice. Data were assessed by using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Bars represent mean ± standard error; *P < .05.
Table 3
Morphometric Analysis of Pancreatic Tissue 60 Days After Activation of KRASG12D and Loss of Atrx
Mist1creERT/+
Mist1creERT/+AtrxflΔ18
Mist1creERT/+KrasLSL-G12D/+
MKA
Male (8)
Female (5)
Male (8)
Female (5)
Male (7)
Female (10)
Male (10)
Female (6)
Fibrosis
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
1 ± 0.66
0.7 ± 0.47
0 ± 0
1.83 ± 0.48
Inflammation
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
0.14 ± 0.14
0.33 ± 0.21
1 ± 0.54
1 ± 0.52
0.2 ± 0.13
2.17 ± 0.70
ADM
0 ± 0
0.2 ± 0.2
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
1.57 ± 0.65
1.5 ± 0.45
0.4 ± 0.16
3 ± 0.45
Total
0 ± 0a
0.2 ± 0.2a
0.14 ± 0.14a
0.33 ± 0.21a
3.57 ± 1.8a,b
3.2 ± 1.4a,b
0.6 ± 0.27a
7 ± 1.57b
NOTE. (#) indicates n value; see methodology for scoring. Histopathologic assessment of pancreatic damage, as indicated by 3 factors: fibrosis, inflammation, and presence of ADM. Scores are represented on a grading scale from 0 to 4. Superscript letters “a” and “b” indicate groups that are statistically different (P < .01). Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test.
Loss of ATRX enhances KRAS’s ability to promote pre-cancerous lesions in female mice. (A) H&E images of pancreatic tissue from male and female Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), and MKA mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Arrows indicate focal ADM or PanIN lesions. Dotted white line delineates significant lesion area from acinar tissue. Islets are indicated by I. Magnification bar = 200 μm. (B) Average percentage of lobules containing at least one instance of ADM, PanIN1, or PanIN2 in Kras (n = 7 male or 10 female) and MKA (n = 10 male or 6 female) mice. Data were assessed by using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Representative examples of ADM, PanIN1, and PanIN2 lesions from female MKA mice. Magnification bars = 50 μm.Histology of pancreatic tissue after Representative (A) trichrome or (B) Alcian blue images of pancreatic tissue from male and female Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), and MKA mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Increased tissue fibrosis was routinely observed in MKA females (arrows). Magnification bar = 200 μm. Increased fibrosis (open arrow) and duct metaplasia are observed in female MKA tissue. Quantification of (C) damaged area as percentage of total pancreatic area based on appearance of PanINs or fibrosis, or (D) number of ADM and PanINs (lesions) observed within Mist1 (WT; n = 8 male or 5 female), Mist1Atrx (Atrx; n = 8 male or 5 female), Mist1Kras (Kras; n = 7 male or 10 female), and MKA (n = 10 male or 6 female) mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Number of ADM and PanINs (lesions) was significantly increased in MKA females compared with all other groups except male Mist1Kras (Kras) mice. Data were assessed by using 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Bars represent mean ± standard error; *P < .05.Morphometric Analysis of Pancreatic Tissue 60 Days After Activation of KRASG12D and Loss of AtrxNOTE. (#) indicates n value; see methodology for scoring. Histopathologic assessment of pancreatic damage, as indicated by 3 factors: fibrosis, inflammation, and presence of ADM. Scores are represented on a grading scale from 0 to 4. Superscript letters “a” and “b” indicate groups that are statistically different (P < .01). Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test.To assess PanIN formation within Mist1Kras and MKA pancreatic tissue, the percentage of pancreatic lobules containing at least one instance of each lesion type (ranging from ADM to PanIN3) was quantified on H&E stained sections (Figure 8B) and statistically compared by 2-way ANOVAs (Table 4). MKA female mice had significantly fewer lobules consisting only of normal acini relative to all other groups (Table 4, P < .05). Whereas both Mist1Kras and MKA mice exhibited ADM, the incidence of PanIN1 in female MKA mice was 2.5-fold higher (16.21% ± 8.3% of lobules; n = 10) relative to female Mist1Krasmice (6.52% ± 3.5%; n = 6), and female MKA mice contained significantly more lobules with PanIN2 lesions than all other genotypes and sexes (Figure 8B, Table 4; P < .01). Interestingly, histologic analysis of male MKA mice revealed no PanIN1 or PanIN2 lesions (Figure 8B, Table 4).
Table 4
Classification of ADM and PanIN Lesions 60 Days After Activation of KRASG12D and Loss of Atrx
Percent of lobules determined by highest lesion grade
Genotype
Sex
Normal
ADM
PanIN1
PanIN2
KRASLSL-G12D
Male (7)
83.1 ± 7.8
10.8 ± 4.2
4.9 ± 3.6
1.3 ± 1.3
Female (10)
60.1 ± 8.2
33.3 ± 6.3
6.5 ± 3.5
0 ± 0
MKA
Male (10)
81.2 ± 7.8
18.8 ± 7.8
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
Female (6)
46.9 ± 11.9a
25.2 ± 5.7
16.2 ± 8.3b
11.7 ± 6.3a
NOTE. (#) indicates n values. Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. These data are presented in Figure 8B.
Difference from all other groups (P < .05).
Difference from male MKA mice (P < .05).
Classification of ADM and PanIN Lesions 60 Days After Activation of KRASG12D and Loss of AtrxNOTE. (#) indicates n values. Data were assessed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. These data are presented in Figure 8B.Difference from all other groups (P < .05).Difference from male MKA mice (P < .05).To determine whether presumptive ADM and PanINs were arising from ATRX null acinar cells, we examined the expression of transcription factors involved in ADM. SOX9 (Figure 10A and B) and PDX1 (data not shown) accumulation was assessed by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry, respectively. As observed earlier, no SOX9+ acinar cells were observed in Mist1 and Mist1Atrxmice. Similarly, Mist1Kras tissue was devoid of SOX9+ acinar cells, although pockets of putative SOX9+ ADM were observed (Figure 10A). Whereas male MKA mice showed few SOX9-expressing cells, SOX9+ cells and ADM were readily apparent in female MKA mice (Figure 10A and B). This widespread SOX9 accumulation in both ADM and acinar cells adjacent to areas of damage suggested SOX9 expression precedes ADM, which is in support of previous studies indicating SOX9 expression is required for ADM. Similar increases for PDX1 were observed in female MKA tissue, with PDX1+ cells readily observed in ADM and PanINs (data not shown) compared with all other genotypes. In many cases, cells within ADMs and PanIN lesions also stained for Ki67 (Figure 10B), indicating an increase in proliferation in these areas. Quantification of Ki67+ acinar cells showed no significant difference between genotypes, suggesting that proliferation likely occurs after ADM (Figure 10C).
Figure 10
PanIN lesions in mice are derived from ATRX– acinar cells undergoing ADM. (A) Immunofluorescent images for SOX9 in male and female Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), and MKA mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Insets show nuclear localization of SOX9 in putative ADM in MKA mice. (B) Co-immunofluorescence of putative ADM in female MKA pancreatic tissue shows SOX9 nuclear accumulation in proliferating cells based on Ki67 accumulation (red). White arrows indicate cells expressing Ki67 and SOX9. Sections were counterstained for DAPI. Magnification bars = 50 μm. (C) Quantification of Ki67+ acinar cells in Mist1, Mist1Atrx, Mist1Kras, and MKA mice. Bars represent mean ± standard error. N = 3 for each group. (D) Immunohistochemistry for ATRX in putative ADM and PanINs in male and female Mist1Kras (Kras) and MKA mice. ATRX+ lesions are identified in Mist1Kras mice (black arrow), whereas female MKA revealed both ATRX+ (*) and ATRX– (**) cells within the PanINs. ATRX+ cells are found in ducts (D) and islets (I) of MKA males and in interstitial fibroblasts in MKA females. (E) Quantification of lesions with at least 1 ATRX+ cell (black) or no ATRX+ cells (gray) in Mist1 (WT; n = 3 for male and female), Mist1Atrx (Atrx; n = 3 for male and female), Mist1Kras (Kras; n = 3 for male or n = 6 for female), and MKA (n = 4 for male or n = 3 for female) mice. Bars represent mean % ± standard error.
PanIN lesions in mice are derived from ATRX– acinar cells undergoing ADM. (A) Immunofluorescent images for SOX9 in male and female Mist1 (WT), Mist1Atrx (Atrx), Mist1Kras (Kras), and MKA mice 60 days after tamoxifen treatment. Insets show nuclear localization of SOX9 in putative ADM in MKA mice. (B) Co-immunofluorescence of putative ADM in female MKA pancreatic tissue shows SOX9 nuclear accumulation in proliferating cells based on Ki67 accumulation (red). White arrows indicate cells expressing Ki67 and SOX9. Sections were counterstained for DAPI. Magnification bars = 50 μm. (C) Quantification of Ki67+ acinar cells in Mist1, Mist1Atrx, Mist1Kras, and MKA mice. Bars represent mean ± standard error. N = 3 for each group. (D) Immunohistochemistry for ATRX in putative ADM and PanINs in male and female Mist1Kras (Kras) and MKA mice. ATRX+ lesions are identified in Mist1Krasmice (black arrow), whereas female MKA revealed both ATRX+ (*) and ATRX– (**) cells within the PanINs. ATRX+ cells are found in ducts (D) and islets (I) of MKA males and in interstitial fibroblasts in MKA females. (E) Quantification of lesions with at least 1 ATRX+ cell (black) or no ATRX+ cells (gray) in Mist1 (WT; n = 3 for male and female), Mist1Atrx (Atrx; n = 3 for male and female), Mist1Kras (Kras; n = 3 for male or n = 6 for female), and MKA (n = 4 for male or n = 3 for female) mice. Bars represent mean % ± standard error.This expression pattern of SOX9 suggests normal progression through ADM in MKA mice but does not indicate whether ADM arises from ATRX-positive cells. Therefore, ATRX accumulation was examined to confirm an acinar cell origin for ADM and PanINs. All presumptive ADM observed in male Mist1Krasmice tissue was ATRX positive. Similarly, all ADM and PanINs in female Mist1Kras tissue contained exclusively ATRX-positive cells. In Mist1KrasAtrx female mice, which harbor one transcriptionally active copy of the Atrx gene, ADM and PanINs contained mixed populations of ATRX+ and ATRX– cells. Fifty-nine percent ± 17% of lesions contained at least 1 ATRX+ cell, with the other 41% ± 17% lesions containing only ATRX-negative cells (Figure 10D and E). The ATRX– lesions likely arise from cells in which the non-targeted Atrx gene has been silenced as part of X chromosome inactivation. Although some ATRX+ cells were observed in PanINs and ADMs of MKA mice, the majority of lesions were completely devoid of ATRX expression in male (82% ± 7%) and female (73% ± 10%) mice. Because ATRX is ubiquitously expressed, the absence of ATRX in PanINs and ADM suggests the origin of these lesions in MKA mice as acinar cells.Finally, to determine whether sex-specific susceptibility conferred by the absence of ATRX on KRASmice translates to humans, we queried the International Cancer Genome Consortium (dcc.icgc.org) database for ATRX mutations (Figure 11). The International Cancer Genome Consortium database includes whole genome sequence analysis for 729 patients from Australian and Canadian tumor sequencing studies and consists of 324 female patients (42%) and 405 male patients (53%). Gender was not identified in 5% of the patients. Therefore, the proportion of PDACpatients reported as female was 0.44. KRAS mutations were identified in 591 patients, with a similar ratio of male (55%) to female (45%) patients. Two hundred sixty-eight mutations were observed within the ATRX gene, encompassing 145 (∼19%) PDACpatients, with 68% of ATRX mutations in female patients. Therefore, the proportion of PDACpatients carrying ATRX mutations that were female was 0.68. The difference in proportions is significant, χ2(1, N = 729) = 41.633; P < .00001 (Figure 11B), suggesting ATRX mutations are related to the sex of the patient.
Figure 11
Mutation analysis on PDAC patients based on data from the International Cancer Genome Consortium. (A) Comparison of gender breakdown for all PDAC cases, or for mutations in ATRX, known driver mutations for PDAC (KRAS, CDNK2/P16), or for DAXX. Impact ATRX mutations refer to those mutations that occur with the protein coding region and are predicted to have a negative impact on protein function. (B and C) Chi-squared analyses determining if ATRX mutations and sex are independent variables in PDAC (B) or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs; C).
Mutation analysis on PDACpatients based on data from the International Cancer Genome Consortium. (A) Comparison of gender breakdown for all PDAC cases, or for mutations in ATRX, known driver mutations for PDAC (KRAS, CDNK2/P16), or for DAXX. Impact ATRX mutations refer to those mutations that occur with the protein coding region and are predicted to have a negative impact on protein function. (B and C) Chi-squared analyses determining if ATRX mutations and sex are independent variables in PDAC (B) or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs; C).Most ATRX mutations in both sexes are found in non-coding regions, and the impact on expression is unknown. However, 8 patients harbor ATRX mutations with a predicted impact on protein function. All but one of these mutations occur in female patients, suggesting a sex-specific susceptibility in the humanpatient population. Pancreatic neuroendocrine and glioblastomapatient populations show 46% and 42% of the identified ATRX mutations are in female populations. Conversely, 60% of the ATRX mutations found in the pediatric brain tumor population occur in female patients. However, χ2 analysis indicates the proportions of ATRX mutations are independent of sex (Figure 11C and data not shown). Interestingly, mutations in DAXX, the partner for ATRX in depositing H3.3 variant histones into chromatin,11, 12 are rare in PDAC and show no sex bias. Other common mutations linked to PDAC, including P16/CDNK2 (Figure 11A) and SMAD4 (data not shown), showed no sex bias.
Discussion
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is currently the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in North America (www.pancan.org). Five-year survival rates have increased only marginally in the last 30 years because of late stage of diagnosis and insensitivity to conventional chemotherapeutics. Therefore, detecting factors that increase sensitivity of pancreatic tissue to the oncogenic properties of mutated KRAS is important in identifying alternative therapeutic and diagnostic options. In this study, we have shown that acinar-specific loss of ATRX, a chromatin remodelling protein, affects the tissue’s response to injury and constitutive mutant KRAS activity. Using a novel mouse line that allows for acinar-specific ablation of Atrx, we show loss of ATRX increased the sensitivity for pancreatic injury. In addition, we showed loss of Atrx dramatically enhanced the ability of oncogenic KRAS to promote precancerous lesions in the pancreas. Importantly, these effects were observed in a sex-specific fashion, with only female mice displaying sensitivity to loss of ATRX. Our results also suggest that loss of ATRX may reduce the sensitivity to oncogenic KRAS in male mice. This is evidence of a sex-specific susceptibility factor and suggests stratification of PDAC based on their molecular profile may identify new targets for therapy and diagnosis.Although we have not defined a role for ATRX in normal acinar cell physiology, it appears ATRX is dispensable for maintaining the acinar cell phenotype in the adult. This is consistent with previous studies that identified roles for ATRX only in mitotically active tissue, where loss of ATRX maintains genomic stability and regulates cell cycle processes including proper chromosome segregation during mitosis.14, 27 We did observe small, yet significant increases in acinar cell apoptosis, dsDNA damage, and proliferation in Mist1Atrxmice, suggesting during a longer period of time (>2 months), the absence of ATRX may lead to more overt damage. Acinar cell division in the adult rodent pancreas is <2%, which is similar to the observed rates of apoptosis and dsDNA damage. However, targeted ablation of other factors, including Xbp1 and Pdx1, results in rapid loss of acinar tissue, so acinar cell division is clearly not a prerequisite for development of overt pancreatic pathologies. Mild damage in acinar tissue with ATRX loss suggested acinar cells may be sensitive to other factors known to promote pancreatic pathologies.When exposed to recurrent cerulein treatment, only Mist1Atrxmice showed fibrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and regions of ADM, with the effects more dramatic in female mice. It is unclear whether loss of ATRX leads to increased damage or if regeneration is impaired in Mist1Atrxmice. Unpublished work from our laboratory using an acute pancreatitis regimen indicated similar amounts of damage in control and Mist1Atrxmice immediately after injury, suggesting loss of ATRX impairs the regenerative process after injury, and is consistent with studies in which other chromatin remodelling proteins (EZH2 and BMI1) are required for proper pancreatic regeneration. It is possible that defects from Atrx loss become more widespread once injury is induced, and increased DNA damage and/or replicative defects provide a barrier to acinar tissue regeneration. However, we found no differences in apoptosis and proliferation in cerulein-treated mice, suggesting these are not contributing factors through which ATRX loss promotes damage.The combination of Atrx deletion with oncogenic KRAS activation produced extensive fibrosis and inflammation, pancreatic damage indicative of chronic pancreatitis, as well as PanIN lesions up to grade 2. In this instance, damage was exclusive to female mice. Consistent with previous studies, we observed minimal fibrosis and PanIN lesions in KRASmice that indicate oncogenic KRAS activation in adult mice required another stimulus, such as chronic pancreatitis, to produce invasive PDAC. The pancreatic injury observed in the female MKA mice suggests that chronic pancreatitis occurs in these mice, and the inflammation observed may contribute to increased susceptibility to active KRAS. Loss of function mutations in ATRX have been identified in other cancer types, most notably those involving up-regulation of the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway.13, 35 Mutations in ATRX or binding partner DAXX are often observed in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and glioblastomas, but neither cancer shows a gender preference with or without ATRX mutation. Studies examining PDACtumors confirmed an absence of alternative lengthening of telomeres in every case, and PDAC is typically characterized by telomere attrition. Therefore, we suggest that ATRX is affecting an alternative pathway in PDAC, possibly in a DAXX-independent manner. ATRX interacts with enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2), a member of polycomb repressor complex 2, leading to altered gene expression, and loss of EZH2 also increases sensitivity to oncogenic KRAS.The incidence of humanPDAC between sexes is relatively equal, with approximately the same number of cases occurring in men and women (Canadian Cancer Statistics, 2016). Assessment of International Cancer Genomic Consortium database revealed ATRX single nucleotide polymorphisms in almost 20% of PDAC cases (145/729), although most were in non-coding regions of the gene. However, whether in the coding or non-coding regions, ATRX mutations had a higher than expected frequency in female patients, even when taking into consideration that it is an X-linked gene. Therefore, it is possible that ATRX loss defines a unique subtype of PDAC, in which female patients are more susceptible, or that loss of ATRX function in male patients does not allow progression through to a PDAC phenotype. Although we have observed decreased acinar cell sensitivity to oncogenic KRAS in male mice, female MKA mice show significantly increased progression to PanIN1 and PanIN2 lesions, and the mechanisms underlying the extensive pancreatic damage specifically in female MKA mice are unclear. It is possible that loss of ATRX enhances KRAS activity and leads to altered hormonal signalling. Sex hormone receptors, including estrogen receptors, play a role in the progression of other cancers such as colorectal cancer. However, the Atrx gene is located on the X chromosome and is a target of X inactivation. Therefore, it would be expected that female mice heterozygous (Atrx) for the mutant Atrx allele would also show similar effects because approximately half of the acinar cells lose ATRX expression. Immunohistochemistry for ATRX confirmed that at least a portion of acinar cells in heterozygous Atrxmice did lose ATRX expression (data not shown), but these mice did not demonstrate increased damage or susceptibility to oncogenic KRAS. These results suggest complete loss of ATRX is required for enhanced KRAS activity and pancreatic damage to occur in female mice. However, such a model also does not account for decreased sensitivity in male MKA mice.Sex-specific mechanisms could also be explained by a difference in inflammatory response. It is possible that female Atrxmice are more susceptible to factors promoting inflammation. During recurrent pancreatic injury, Atrxmice showed increased inflammation in comparison with male counterparts, resulting in higher levels of damage. In combination with oncogenic KRAS, increased inflammation in Atrxmice may amplify KRAS activity and activation of downstream pathways, including MAPK and PI3K-PDK1-Akt signaling, leading to increased cell survival and proliferation. Accordingly, increased KRAS activity by inflammatory cytokines (nuclear factor kappa B, interleukin 6) has been demonstrated previously.40, 41 The presence of an inflammatory response in female Atrxmice, which is not observed in male Atrxmice, could lead to increased damage.It is also possible that sex-specific differences exist regarding the function of SOX9. Previous work suggests SOX9 is required for initiation of ADM, and we show increased SOX9 accumulation in female MKA acinar cells surrounding damage. Increased susceptibility in female MKA mice could include sex-specific hormonal or inflammatory pathways that provoke increased SOX9 expression. As mentioned, female Atrxmice have an amplified inflammatory response, and inflammatory signaling pathways can influence SOX9 expression during development. Alternatively, hormonal factors could play a role in sex-specific Sox9 regulation. Recently, up-regulation of estrogen receptor α-receptor activity in breast cancer cells has been associated with increased SOX9 expression, although this study occurs in the context of estrogen deprivation.It would be interesting to observe the long-term effects of ATRX deletion on oncogenic KRAS-mediated PDAC formation. Because of the prevalence of tumors developing in the oral mucosa, we were forced to kill MKA mice before overt PDAC development. These tumors likely arise because of the expression of Mist1 in other tissues, and we are currently generating Atrxmice with a pancreas-specific inducible cre-recombinase, which will allow for longer-term analysis. It is possible that having only a single copy of Mist1 contributes to the Mist1Atrx and MKA phenotypes. Although previous studies and unpublished work from our laboratory demonstrated no difference in the phenotype between mice heterozygous or wild-type (WT) for MIST1 expression, using a different cre-recombinase (such as Ptf1a) would rule out any contribution of Mist1haploinsufficiency to the results observed in this study.In summary, we identified that loss of ATRX enhanced pancreatic injury and susceptibility to KRAS-mediated pancreatic damage. Potential gender-specific factors within Atrxmice (including hormonal factors or increased inflammation) provide an additional driving factor for KRAS activity and pancreatic damage, leading to a female-specific phenotype.
Materials and Methods
Animal Generation and Cre Induction
Mouse experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Western University (Protocol #2017-001). All mice used in this study were maintained in a C57Bl6 background. Mice expressing creERT from the Mist1 locus (Mist1) were crossed with mice harboring an Atrx allele with exon 18 flanked by loxP sites, producing male (Mist1Atrx) and female (Mist1Atrx) mice, collectively referred to as Mist1Atrx. Mist1Atrxmice were crossed to mice containing an inducible oncogenic KRAS (loxP-STOP-loxP (LSL)-KRAS) to produce Mist1KrasAtrxmice (referred to as MKA). Furthermore, female mice containing one (Mist1Atrx) or two (Mist1Atrx) copies of the Atrx allele showed no obvious phenotypic differences and were combined as a single Mist1 control group. Female mice expressing KRASG12D that were heterozygous (Mist1KrasAtrx) or homozygous for Atrx (Mist1KrasAtrx) also showed no obvious morphologic differences and were collectively referred to as Mist1Krasmice.Tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO; cat. #T5648) was administered through oral gavage (2 mg/mouse) 3 times over 5 days. This resulted in >95% recombination in acinar cells and no recombination in duct cells. Mice were monitored for 60 days from first tamoxifen gavage, and body weight was measured weekly.
Cerulein Induced Pancreatitis
To induce recurrent pancreatic injury, control (Mist1) and Mist1Atrxmice were given intraperitoneal injections of saline or cerulein (75 μg/kg body weight; Sigma-Aldrich; cat. #C9026) twice daily for 11 days, followed by a 3-day recovery period. Mice were weighed daily throughout the injury protocol. Mice were killed and processed for histologic, molecular, biochemical, and blood serum analysis. Serum amylase was quantified by using Phadebas tablets (Magle Life Sciences, Lund, Sweden; cat. #1302) following manufacturer’s instructions.
Histology, Immunohistochemistry, and Immunofluorescent Analysis
The head of the pancreas was used for paraffin sections, and cryostat sections were obtained from the middle portion of pancreas. Tissue was washed 2 times in phosphate-buffered saline and then dehydrated through a series of alcohol washes for embedding into paraffin. Paraffin sections (5 μm) were stained by using standard H&E, Alcian blue (Mucin Stain; Abcam Inc, Cambridge, MA; cat. #ab150662) or Masson’s trichrome stain (Abcam Inc; cat. #ab150686) protocols. Sections were imaged by using the Aperio CS2 Digital Scanner and Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems Imaging Inc, San Diego, CA). Total tissue area was quantified by using the Fiji software, and area of damage was quantified as a percentage of total area. Levels of pancreatic damage were assessed by using a grading scale based on 3 factors: fibrosis, inflammation, and presence of acinar to ductal metaplasia. Tissue sections were scored by multiple individuals blinded to mouse genotypes on a scale from 0 to 4. Descriptions of each score can be found in Table 1 along with a description of scoring PanIN lesions.
Table 1
Histology Grading Criteria
ADM (based on worst pancreatic lobule)
Fibrosis (based on trichrome stain)
0
None present
0
None present
1
>10% of lobule
1
<5% of tissue area
2
10%–30% of lobule
2
5%–10% of tissue area
3
30%–50% of lobule
3
10%–20% of tissue area
4
>50% of lobule
4
>20% of tissue area
Inflammation
0
None present
1
Focal: small, contained areas
2
Mild: small, slightly diffuse areas
3
Moderate: diffuse areas
4
Severe: diffuse areas, significant presence throughout the tissue
NOTE. Grading of pancreatic lesions: pancreatic lesions (ranging from ADM to PanIN grade 3) were quantified and classified into the following categories: ADM, PanIN grade 1, PanIN grade 2, PanIN grade 3, or PDAC based on morphologic characteristics including cell shape (cuboidal or columnar), presence of mucin accumulation, nuclear atypia, pseudostratification, and papillary or cribriform structure.
For immunohistochemical analysis, paraffin tissue sections were stained by using the ABC staining system (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Dallas, TX) or the VectaStain ABC HRP kit with ImmPACT DAB Peroxidase (HRP) Substrate (Vector Laboratories, Brockville, ON, Canada; cat. #SK-4105) according to kit instructions. Cleaved caspase-3 (rabbit 1:100; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; cat. #966455) staining was completed by using the Ventana Discovery Ultra XT autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, AZ). Primary antibodies used are specific to ATRX (rabbit; diluted 1:100 in 1.5% mouse blocking serum in phosphate-buffered saline; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc; cat. #sc15408), PDX1 (rabbit; 1:1000; Abcam Inc; cat. #ab47267), Ki67 (rabbit 1:500; Abcam Inc; cat. #ab15580). For immunofluorescence, cryostat sections were processed as previously described. Primary antibodies used were specific to ATRX (rabbit; diluted 1:100 in blocking solution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc), MIST1 (rabbit; 1:500), β-catenin (mouse; 1:500; BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON, Canada; cat. #610153, lot#5121508), SOX9 (rabbit; 1:500; MilliporeSigma, Etobicoke, ON, Canada; cat. #AB5535, lot#3018860), insulin (mouse 1:500; Sigma; cat. #I2018; lot#092K4841), or γH2AX (rabbit; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc; cat. #sc-101696, lot#12613). Secondary antibodies used include anti-rabbitFITC (cat. #111-545-003, lot#125266) and anti-mouseFITC (cat. #115-025-003, lot#125278; 1:250; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Sections were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and imaged using a Leica DM5500B microscope with LAS V4.4 software (Leica Microsystems Ltd, Wetzlar, Germany).
Protein Isolation and Western Blot Analyses
Protein was isolated from the middle portion of the pancreata and homogenized on ice using a Potter Elvehiem Homogenizer in extraction buffer (50 mmol/L Tris [pH 7.2], 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L CaCl2, 1% NP-40, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, 0.5 mmol/L PMSF, 10 mmol/L NaF, 2 mmol/L NaVO4, 150 nmol/L aprotinin, 10 μmol/L, pepstatin, 50 μmol/L leupeptin). Homogenates were sonicated for 20 seconds on ice (level 4 Fisher Sonic Dismemberator) and centrifuged 10 minutes at 4°C at 14,000g. Supernatants were taken and frozen at –80°C until used. Isolated protein was resolved by sodium dodecylsulfate–gel electrophoresis in 10% acrylamide gels and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad; cat. #162-0177) for Western blot analyses. Primary antibodies were specific for total MAPK (tERK1/2) (rabbit 1:2500 in 5% BSA-0.1% Tween20; Cell Signaling Technology; cat. #9102, lot #26), carboxypeptidase (CPA) (rabbit 1:1000 in 5% NFDM; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; cat. #AF2765, lot #wo00117071), and amylase (rabbit 1:1000 in 5% NFDM; Abcam; cat. #ab21156). After overnight incubation, blots were incubated in secondary antibody (anti-rabbit HRP, 1:10,000; Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, ME; cat. #111-035-144) diluted in 5% NFDM for 1 hour at room temperature. Blots were developed by using Clarity Western blot ECL kit (Biorad; cat. #1705061) and visualized by using the VersaDoc system with Quantity One 1-D analysis software (Bio-Rad).
TUNEL Assay
To assess apoptosis, cryostat sections were processed using the In Situ Cell Death detection kit (Roche, Laval, QC, Canada; cat. #11684795910) per manufacturer’s directions. Sections were counterstained with DAPI. The number of TUNEL-positive cells was quantified using 7 random fields of view from each mouse and calculated as percentage of TUNEL-positive cells compared with DAPI counts.
Statistical Analysis
In all cases, data were analyzed for significance by using an unpaired, two-tailed t test or 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc test. Values are depicted as means ± standard error of the mean. Significance is considered P < .05.
Authors: David Garrick; Vassiliki Samara; Tarra L McDowell; Andrew J H Smith; Lorraine Dobbie; Douglas R Higgs; Richard J Gibbons Journal: Gene Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: E L Jackson; N Willis; K Mercer; R T Bronson; D Crowley; R Montoya; T Jacks; D A Tuveson Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Janel L Kopp; Guido von Figura; Erin Mayes; Fen-Fen Liu; Claire L Dubois; John P Morris; Fong Cheng Pan; Haruhiko Akiyama; Christopher V E Wright; Kristin Jensen; Matthias Hebrok; Maike Sander Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Sandra Baumgart; Nai-Ming Chen; Jens T Siveke; Alexander König; Jin-San Zhang; Shiv K Singh; Elmar Wolf; Marek Bartkuhn; Irene Esposito; Elisabeth Heßmann; Johanna Reinecke; Julius Nikorowitsch; Marius Brunner; Garima Singh; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico; Thomas Smyrk; William R Bamlet; Martin Eilers; Albrecht Neesse; Thomas M Gress; Daniel D Billadeau; David Tuveson; Raul Urrutia; Volker Ellenrieder Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Jean-Paul De La O; Lyska L Emerson; Jessica L Goodman; Scott C Froebe; Benjamin E Illum; Andrew B Curtis; L Charles Murtaugh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carmen Guerra; Alberto J Schuhmacher; Marta Cañamero; Paul J Grippo; Lena Verdaguer; Lucía Pérez-Gallego; Pierre Dubus; Eric P Sandgren; Mariano Barbacid Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Chang Sun; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Elizabeth M Whitley; Gilda P Chau; Guillermina Lozano; Amanda R Wasylishen Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 5.732
Authors: Kinga B Stopa; Agnieszka A Kusiak; Mateusz D Szopa; Pawel E Ferdek; Monika A Jakubowska Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 5.923