Literature DB >> 30510974

Report on Implementation, Use, and Sustainability of a Labor Epidural Service in Georgetown, Guyana.

Sara L Zettervall, Andrew Amata, Jeffery S Berger, Paul Dangerfield, Ruth Derkenne, Ramon Go, Deborah Jeon, Kiera Murphy, Molly Phillips, Marian Sherman, Khashayar Vaziri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of epidural analgesia for laboring women is generally unavailable at public hospitals in Guyana despite favorable utilization rates in private institutions. In 2014, a healthcare team completed a targeted mission aimed at neuraxial analgesia training of providers at the preeminent public hospital in Georgetown, Guyana. This study evaluates the impact of the training, including provider attitudes, use, and barriers.
METHODS: A prospective, mixed methods study of all obstetric, nursing, and anesthesiology providers at Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation was completed. Quantitative assessment of the posttraining use of epidural analgesia at 2 and 6 months was documented. Provider surveys were distributed anonymously at 2 months posttraining. Targeted interviews were completed from a random sampling of providers at 6 months; qualitative analysis of interviews formulated the basis for reporting limitations and barriers.
RESULTS: Providers surveyed included 7 anesthesia providers and 24 obstetrics providers. Respondents believed Guyanese women should be offered epidural analgesia (93%), epidurals could be performed safely (87%), and Guyana has the resources necessary for routine use (81%). In assessing epidural knowledge, anesthesia providers achieved 60% correct response rate compared to 84% among obstetrics providers. Nurse anesthetists placed 16 epidurals following training. However, placement ceased after 2 months. The largest barriers to placement were unavailable anesthesia staff (63%), lack of supplies (16%), and insufficient nursing staff to monitor patients with epidurals (11%).
CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week mission achieved widespread Guyanese provider acceptance despite a lack of previous experience. However, barriers proved insurmountable to achieving a sustainable, independently functioning epidural analgesia program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidural; medical mission; neuraxial anesthesia; obstetric anesthesia

Year:  2018        PMID: 30510974      PMCID: PMC6256998     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med        ISSN: 2333-0406


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of neonatal effects of epidural and general anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Elif Bengi Sener; Fuat Guldogus; Deniz Karakaya; Sibel Baris; Serhat Kocamanoglu; Ayla Tur
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Volunteer orthopedic surgical trips in Nicaragua: a cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Authors:  Andrew T Chen; Andrew Pedtke; Jeffrey K Kobs; George S Edwards; R Richard Coughlin; Richard A Gosselin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  International surgery: the development of postgraduate surgical training in Guyana.

Authors:  Brian H Cameron; Madan Rambaran; Deen P Sharma; Robert H Taylor
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  "Ultra-light" patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: effects of varying regimens on analgesia and physician workload.

Authors:  B Carvalho; S E Cohen; K Giarrusso; M Durbin; E T Riley; S Lipman
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.603

6.  The premature infant: anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  S H Rolbin; M M Cohen; C M Levinton; E N Kelly; D Farine
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Is international volunteer surgery for cleft lip and cleft palate a cost-effective and justifiable intervention? A case study from East Asia.

Authors:  Woori Moon; Henry Perry; Rong-Min Baek
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Brain Gains: a literature review of medical missions to low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Alexandra L C Martiniuk; Mitra Manouchehrian; Joel A Negin; Anthony B Zwi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study.

Authors:  Charles S Algert; Jennifer R Bowen; Warwick B Giles; Greg E Knoblanche; Samantha J Lain; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care.

Authors:  Jesse Maki; Munirih Qualls; Benjamin White; Sharon Kleefield; Robert Crone
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.