Literature DB >> 30510957

Impact of comorbidities and delay in diagnosis in elderly patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Marylise Ginoux1, Ségolène Turquier2, Nader Chebib1, Jean-Charles Glerant2, Julie Traclet1, François Philit1, Agathe Sénéchal1, Jean-François Mornex1,3, Vincent Cottin1,3.   

Abstract

Patient age at diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension is steadily increasing. The present study sought to analyse clinical characteristics, time to diagnosis and prognosis of pulmonary hypertension in elderly and very elderly patients. A study was conducted in a French regional referral centre for pulmonary hypertension. All consecutive patients diagnosed with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension were included and categorised according to age: <65 years ("young"), 65-74 years ("elderly") and ≥75 years ("very elderly"). Over a 4-year period, 248 patients were included: 101 (40.7%) were young, 82 (33.1%) were elderly and 65 (26.2%) were very elderly. The median age at diagnosis among the total population was 68 years. Compared with young patients, elderly and very elderly patients had a longer time to diagnosis (7±48, 9±21 and 16±32 months, respectively; p<0.001). Patients ≥75 years also more often had group 4 pulmonary hypertension. The median overall survival was 46±1.4 months, but was only 37±4.9 months in elderly patients and 28±4.7 months in very elderly patients. Survival from the first symptoms and survival adjusted to comorbidity was similar across age groups. Patient age should be taken into account when diagnosing pulmonary hypertension as it is associated with a specific clinical profile and a worse prognosis. The difference in prognosis is likely to be related to a delay in diagnosis and a greater number of comorbidities.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30510957      PMCID: PMC6258090          DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00100-2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ERJ Open Res        ISSN: 2312-0541


Introduction

Available demographic data for pulmonary hypertension come from national registries and focus on patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) [1-7]. Scarce data are available in patients of all pulmonary hypertension subgroups [8]. The first registry published in 1987 reported a mean age of 36 years at diagnosis [1]; it is currently between 50 and 65 years [2-9]. In most published data, elderly patients (≥65 years) with pulmonary hypertension exhibit specific clinical, aetiological and haemodynamic features [4-11]. Prognosis also seems to be worse in those ≥65 years of age [6]. In clinical practice, specific management issues usually arise in patients ≥75 years of age. The geriatric population more often has atypical clinical presentations, more comorbidities and the need for therapeutic adjustments. Although they represent an increasing proportion of patients, there are no data available for very elderly patients (≥75 years). Here, we present long-term survival data from patients with different pulmonary hypertension subtypes. We compared clinical characteristics, haemodynamic profiles and long-term survival of young (<65 years), elderly (65–74 years) and very elderly (≥75 years) patients. We also assessed the impact of age and time to diagnosis on their long-term survival.

Patients and methods

Data from a pulmonary hypertension regional centre cohort (Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Louis Pradel Hospital, Lyon, France) were analysed. All consecutive patients referred to our centre for an initial assessment of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension were included if data from right heart catheterisation at diagnosis showed mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >3 Wood Units and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAWP) ≤15 mmHg. Patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with respiratory disease were included if pulmonary hypertension was severe: mPAP at time of diagnosis >35 mmHg or cardiac index <2.5 L·min−1·m−2 [12, 13]. Elderly patients were defined as those aged ≥65 years, in accordance with the threshold defined by the World Health Organization and used in earlier publications [6, 9–11]. We chose a second threshold of ≥75 years to define very elderly patients because it is the age used in France for admission to geriatric institutions [14]. Patients were thus divided into three groups according to their age at diagnosis: “young” patients were those aged <65 years, “elderly” patients were those aged 65–74 years, and “very elderly” patients were those aged ≥75 years. Data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients and from the national pulmonary hypertension register (for the Lyon centre), including all demographic, clinical, functional and haemodynamic characteristics. Diagnosis delay was defined as the time from onset of symptoms (usually dyspnoea) to the date of initial haemodynamic evaluation. Categorical variables were described by frequency (number) and percentage. Quantitative variables were expressed as median and standard deviation. The assumption of normality of the distribution of quantitative variables was verified using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and verified graphically using a histogram. Categorical variables were compared by the Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, when the conditions for using the Chi-squared test were not met. Quantitative variables were compared between groups using the t-test, after verifying the equality of variances, when the distribution was normal, and the nonparametric Wilcoxon test (when it was less than three groups) or Kruskal–Wallis test (for comparison groups of three or more groups), when the distribution was not normal. For survival analysis, time to the event was that between diagnosis and date of last known status or death (all cause). Overall survival between groups was compared by the Kaplan–Meier test and survival curves were produced using the log-rank test. The proportionality assumption of risk was verified; prognostic factors for death were determined using the Cox semiparametric model, initially using a univariate model, and then with a multivariate model that included the significant variables in the univariate analysis and relevant adjustment variables. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Over a 4-year period, 411 patients were referred to our department for an initial evaluation. 248 patients met the inclusion criteria (figure 1). 48 of these patients had no invasive re-evaluation and were therefore not included in the survival analyses.
FIGURE 1

Selection of patients: 248 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension were included in the study. PAWP: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; CI: cardiac index; CTD: connective tissue disease; POPH: portopulmonary hypertension; CHD: congenital heart disease; PVOD: pulmonary veno-occlusive disease; ILD: interstitial lung disease; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPFE: combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.

The median±sd age at diagnosis was 68±13.7 years; 33.1% (n=82) were elderly (median±sd age 70±2.8 years) and 26.2% (n=65) were very elderly (median±sd age 79±3.7 years) (table 1).
TABLE 1

Clinical and functional characteristics of patients at initial assessment

AllYoung(<65 years)Elderly(65–74 years)Very elderly(≥75 years)p-value
Patients248 (100)101 (40.7)82 (33.1)65 (26.2)
Age years68±13.754±10.370±2.879±3.7
Female127 (51.2)60 (59.4)31 (37.8)36 (55.4)0.011
Pulmonary hypertension aetiological group<0.001
 Group 1113 (45.6)56 (55.4)33 (40.2)24 (36.9)
 Group 377 (31.0)18 (17.8)36 (43.9)23 (35.4)
 Group 439 (15.7)14 (13.9)9 (11.0)16 (24.6)
 Group 519 (7.7)13 (12.9)4 (4.9)2 (3.1)
Time to diagnosis months9±387±489±2116±320.001
Functional class (NYHA)0.175
 I11 (4.5)5 (5.0)5 (6.2)1 (1.6)
 II82 (33.5)35 (35.0)29 (35.8)18 (27.7)
 III134 (54)57 (57.0)38 (46.9)39 (60.9)
 IV18 (7.3)3 (3.0)9 (11.1)6 (9.4)
6MWD m330 (127)355 (115)315 (117)210 (125)<0.001

Data are presented as n (%) or median±sd, unless otherwise stated. NYHA: New York Heart Association; 6MWD: 6-min walk distance.

Clinical and functional characteristics

There was a significant relationship between age and pulmonary hypertension aetiology (p<0.001). PAH (group 1) was diagnosed in 45.6% of patients and was the most common type of pulmonary hypertension in young patients (55.4%). The elderly and very elderly patients more often had pulmonary hypertension associated with respiratory disease than young patients (group 3: 43.9% of elderly patients and 35.4% of very elderly patients). In very elderly patients, nearly a quarter (24.6%) had chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (group 4). Age was associated with a lower baseline 6-min walk distance (6MWD) (p<0.001), but the oldest patients were as often in functional class III or IV (New York Heart Association) as their younger counterparts (p=0.205). Very elderly patients had a higher prevalence of comorbidities: systemic arterial hypertension (p<0.001), coronary artery disease (p=0.05) and cardiac arrhythmias (p<0.001). The mean of the Charlson Comorbidity Index score increased according to age group (p<0.001) (tables 1 and 2).
TABLE 2

Major comorbidities

AllYoung(<65 years)Elderly(65–74 years)Very elderly(≥75 years)p-value
Patients248 (100)101 (40.7)82 (33.1)65 (26.2)
Coronary artery disease46 (18.5)13 (12.9)22 (26.8)11 (16.9)0.050
Arrhythmias34 (13.7)4 (4.0)14 (17.1)16 (24.6)<0.001
Thromboembolic disease33 (13.3)13 (12.9)13 (15.9)7 (10.8)
Obstructive lung disease49 (19.8)15 (14.9)23 (28)11 (16.9)0.657
Smoking135 (54.4)60 (44.4)48 (35.6)27 (20.0)0.053
Hypertension117 (47.2)30 (29.7)47 (57.3)40 (61.5)<0.001
Dyslipidaemia52 (21.0)10 (9.9)25 (30.5)17 (26.2)0.002
Diabetes51 (20.6)14 (13.9)24 (29.3)13 (20.0)0.037
Peripheral vascular disease24 (9.7)2 (2.0)10 (12.2)12 (18.5)0.001
Stroke10 (4.0)2 (2.0)3 (3.7)5 (7.7)0.190
Cognitive disorder6 (2.4)4 (4.0)02 (3.1)0.177
Charlson Comorbidity Index score4±2.12±1.84±1.55±1.7<0.001

Data are presented as n (%) or median±sd, unless otherwise stated.

Selection of patients: 248 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension were included in the study. PAWP: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; CI: cardiac index; CTD: connective tissue disease; POPH: portopulmonary hypertension; CHD: congenital heart disease; PVOD: pulmonary veno-occlusive disease; ILD: interstitial lung disease; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CPFE: combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Clinical and functional characteristics of patients at initial assessment Data are presented as n (%) or median±sd, unless otherwise stated. NYHA: New York Heart Association; 6MWD: 6-min walk distance. Major comorbidities Data are presented as n (%) or median±sd, unless otherwise stated.

Delay to diagnosis

Very elderly patients had a longer delay in access to a regional referral centre for pulmonary hypertension than elderly and young patients. The mean±sd time to diagnosis was 7±48, 9±21 and 16±32 months, respectively, for young, elderly and very elderly patients (p=0.001) (table 1).

Pulmonary haemodynamic features

At the time of evaluation at a referral centre for pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary arterial pressure (systolic, mean and diastolic) and PVR were lower in elderly and very elderly patients than in young patients. PAWP was similar among age groups (p=0.755). The diastolic pressure gradient significantly decreased with age, but remained >7 mmHg in 241 out of 248 patients. We unexpectedly found that age (≥75 years) was associated with a lower cardiac index (p=0.004) (table 3).
TABLE 3

Initial haemodynamic data

AllYoung(<65 years)Elderly(65–74 years)Very elderly(≥75 years)p-value
Patients248 (100)101 (40.7)82 (33.1)65 (26.2)
sPAP mmHg64±17.673±21.261±12.763±14.10.001
mPAP mmHg39±11.245±13.637±6.738±8.4<0.001
dPAP mmHg25±8.828±10.624±5.923±5.9<0.001
PAWP mmHg8±3.38±3.28±3.368±3.40.755
RAP mmHg5±3.66±3.75±3.86±3.40.501
CO L·min−14.56±1.44.70±1.54.83±1.24.02±1.10.001
CI L·min−1·m−22.52±0.72.60±0.82.59±0.72.21±0.70.004
PVR WU6.5±3.97.3±4.75.5±2.66.7±3.40.005
DPG mmHg17±8.820±10.016±6.814±6.2<0.001

Data are presented as n (%) or median±sd, unless otherwise stated. sPAP: systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; dPAP: diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure; PAWP: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; RAP: right atrial pressure; CO: cardiac output; CI: cardiac index; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; WU: Wood Units; DPG: diastolic pressure gradient (dPAP–PAWP).

Initial haemodynamic data Data are presented as n (%) or median±sd, unless otherwise stated. sPAP: systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; mPAP: mean pulmonary arterial pressure; dPAP: diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure; PAWP: pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; RAP: right atrial pressure; CO: cardiac output; CI: cardiac index; PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance; WU: Wood Units; DPG: diastolic pressure gradient (dPAP–PAWP).

Initial therapeutic management

85.1% of the patients had been treated. 37 patients (14.9%) had not been treated because either they had a thromboendarterectomy (n=12) or because they had too many comorbidities (n=25). The choice of the medications and their combinations differed between age groups (p=0.010). Younger patients more often received endothelin receptor antagonists, epoprostenol and combined therapies than older patients (table 4). This difference in therapeutic management probably contributed to the difference in outcomes among the age groups.
TABLE 4

Initial therapeutic management

AllYoung(<65 years)Elderly(65–74 years)Very elderly(≥75 years)p-value
Patients248 (100)101 (40.7)82 (33.1)65 (26.2)
Endothelin receptor antagonists116 (46.8)59 (58.4)28 (34.1)29 (44.6)0.005
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors122 (49.2)46 (44.6)43 (52.4)33 (50.8)0.632
Epoprostenol14 (5.6)11 (10.9)1 (1.2)2 (3.1)0.014
Calcium channel blockers8 (3.2)3 (3)5 (6.1)0.120
Guanylate cyclase stimulators2 (0.8)1 (1.2)1 (1.5)0.515
Medication regimens0.010
 Therapeutic abstention37 (14.9)15 (14.9)10 (12.2)12 (18.5)
 Monotherapy164 (66.1)58 (57.4)65 (79.3)41 (63.1)
 Dual therapy42 (16.9)23 (22.8)7 (8.5)12 (18.5)
 Triple therapy5 (2.0)5 (5.0)

Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise stated.

Long-term survival

Overall 1-, 2- and 3-year survival was 81%, 71% and 57%, respectively. Survival differed significantly between age groups. Survival of very elderly patients was only 65%, 59% and 40% at 1, 2 and 3 years (p<0.001) (figure 2a). The median survival was not reached in young patients and decreased with age in the two groups of older patients (elderly 37±4.9 months and very elderly 28±4.7 months; p<0.001).
FIGURE 2

Kaplan–Meier curves of long-term survival in young (<65 years), elderly (65–74 years) and very elderly (≥75 years) patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension. a) Observed survival difference was statistically significant between age groups (p<0.001). The table presents observed survival at 12, 24 and 36 months (n (%)), and number of deaths by age group. b) Observed survival difference from the first symptoms was not statistically significant between age groups (p=0.237). c) Observed survival difference after adjustment with the Charlson Comorbidity Index score was also not statistically significant between age groups (p=0.064).

When survival was considered from the date of the first symptoms or was adjusted to the Charlson Comorbidity Index score, no differences were found between age groups (p=0.237 and p=0.343, respectively) (figure 2b and c).

Risk factors for death

According to univariate analysis, male sex, aetiological group 3 pulmonary hypertension, a 6MWD <210 m and a history of COPD, stroke or cognitive disorders were associated with higher mortality in very elderly patients. Initial therapeutic management Data are presented as n (%), unless otherwise stated. Kaplan–Meier curves of long-term survival in young (<65 years), elderly (65–74 years) and very elderly (≥75 years) patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension. a) Observed survival difference was statistically significant between age groups (p<0.001). The table presents observed survival at 12, 24 and 36 months (n (%)), and number of deaths by age group. b) Observed survival difference from the first symptoms was not statistically significant between age groups (p=0.237). c) Observed survival difference after adjustment with the Charlson Comorbidity Index score was also not statistically significant between age groups (p=0.064).

Discussion

The overall long-term survival (57% at 3 years) was lower in patients in our study than observed in previous registries [2-8]. This finding could be explained by the significant number of very elderly patients included. Over half of patients diagnosed with a pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension were aged ≥65 years and a quarter where even aged ≥75 years. This poorer prognosis could also be explained by a high prevalence of patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension, who are known to have a worse prognosis [12]. Unlike most previous reports, the present study included patients in all pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension subgroups. There were more patients with pulmonary hypertension due to chronic respiratory disease (group 3 pulmonary hypertension) or chronic thromboembolic disease (group 4 pulmonary hypertension) in the “elderly” and “very elderly” groups than in the “young” group. Nearly a quarter of very elderly patients had chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, which is likely to be explained by the increase in the incidence of pulmonary embolism with age (1.3 per 1000 habitants per year between 65 and 69 years; up to 2.8 per 1000 habitants per year between 85 and 89 years) [15]. We have shown that pulmonary hypertension is often initially misdiagnosed in very elderly patients, who were probably diagnosed at a later stage of the disease. The cardiac index has usually been reported to be age independent [2, 4, 6, 10, 11]. In this study, mean cardiac output and cardiac index values were lower in very elderly compared with younger patients. We should therefore wonder if this impaired ventricular function had contributed to a worse outcome in very elderly patients. The significantly delayed access to a referral centre for pulmonary hypertension, which partly explained their poorer prognosis, is not the single cause of excess mortality in elderly and very elderly patients. This study was an overall survival analysis including all-cause mortality and did not find significant differences in the causes of death according to age. However, the weight of comorbidities seemed to be predominant in the survival of elderly patients. Associated lung disease and cardiovascular comorbidities were more frequent in elderly patients, and might be a leading cause of death. The Charlson Comorbidity Index, used to assess the competitive comorbidities, correlates with patient survival and has been approved for the treatment of geriatric patients [16-18]. After adjusting on the Charlson Comorbidity Index, survival was comparable across the three age groups. Moreover, in patients aged ≥75 years, only a history of COPD and stroke were independent predictors of mortality. There were several limitations to our study. First, the analysis was retrospective, but most of the data were nevertheless collected prospectively in a national registry at the time of each hospitalisation. It was a single-centre study, but included a relatively large cohort of patients all seen in a tertiary referral department for pulmonary vascular diseases. The study population was heterogeneous due to the inclusion of all pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension causes and was therefore representative of the population seen in clinical practice. Finally, being those with the most severe comorbidities or cognitive problems, very elderly patients may not have been referred for evaluation.

Conclusions

More than a quarter of patients diagnosed with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension are aged ≥75 years. The age of the patients should be taken into account in diagnosing pulmonary hypertension, as it is associated with a specific clinical profile: a longer time to diagnosis and therefore a delayed access to a referral centre for pulmonary hypertension, a high proportion of group 3 and 4 pulmonary hypertension, a higher rate of comorbidities, and lower cardiac index. The long-term survival is worse for elderly and very elderly patients than for their younger counterparts. This difference is likely to be related to a longer delay in diagnosis and a higher burden of comorbidities.
  17 in total

1.  Chronic comorbidity and outcomes of hospital care: length of stay, mortality, and readmission at 30 and 365 days.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; R Ordiñana
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT).

Authors:  Nazzareno Galiè; Marc Humbert; Jean-Luc Vachiery; Simon Gibbs; Irene Lang; Adam Torbicki; Gérald Simonneau; Andrew Peacock; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Maurice Beghetti; Ardeschir Ghofrani; Miguel Angel Gomez Sanchez; Georg Hansmann; Walter Klepetko; Patrizio Lancellotti; Marco Matucci; Theresa McDonagh; Luc A Pierard; Pedro T Trindade; Maurizio Zompatori; Marius Hoeper
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  ASPIRE registry: assessing the Spectrum of Pulmonary hypertension Identified at a REferral centre.

Authors:  J Hurdman; R Condliffe; C A Elliot; C Davies; C Hill; J M Wild; D Capener; P Sephton; N Hamilton; I J Armstrong; C Billings; A Lawrie; I Sabroe; M Akil; L O'Toole; D G Kiely
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  The Giessen Pulmonary Hypertension Registry: Survival in pulmonary hypertension subgroups.

Authors:  Henning Gall; Janine F Felix; Franziska K Schneck; Katrin Milger; Natascha Sommer; Robert Voswinckel; Oscar H Franco; Albert Hofman; Ralph T Schermuly; Norbert Weissmann; Friedrich Grimminger; Werner Seeger; Hossein A Ghofrani
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in acutely hospitalized elderly adults: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wijnanda J Frenkel; Erika J Jongerius; Miranda J Mandjes-van Uitert; Barbara C van Munster; Sophia E de Rooij
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Pulmonary arterial hypertension: baseline characteristics from the REVEAL Registry.

Authors:  David B Badesch; Gary E Raskob; C Greg Elliott; Abby M Krichman; Harrison W Farber; Adaani E Frost; Robyn J Barst; Raymond L Benza; Theodore G Liou; Michelle Turner; Scott Giles; Kathy Feldkircher; Dave P Miller; Michael D McGoon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  The epidemiology of diagnosed pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis in the elderly.

Authors:  W D Kniffin; J A Baron; J Barrett; J D Birkmeyer; F A Anderson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-25

9.  Primary pulmonary hypertension. A national prospective study.

Authors:  S Rich; D R Dantzker; S M Ayres; E H Bergofsky; B H Brundage; K M Detre; A P Fishman; R M Goldring; B M Groves; S K Koerner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Changing demographics, epidemiology, and survival of incident pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from the pulmonary hypertension registry of the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Authors:  Yi Ling; Martin K Johnson; David G Kiely; Robin Condliffe; Charlie A Elliot; J Simon R Gibbs; Luke S Howard; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Karen K K Sheares; Paul A Corris; Andrew J Fisher; James L Lordan; Sean Gaine; J Gerry Coghlan; S John Wort; Michael A Gatzoulis; Andrew J Peacock
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary hypertension: Pathophysiology beyond the lung.

Authors:  Aline C Oliveira; Elaine M Richards; Mohan K Raizada
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 7.658

2.  Old age and multiple comorbidity are associated with delayed diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Authors:  Sohyeon Kim; Hee Jo Han; Ha Young Shin; Seung Woo Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling and Diastolic Function Response to Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Rebecca R Vanderpool; Kendall S Hunter; Michael Insel; Joe G N Garcia; Edward J Bedrick; Ryan J Tedford; Franz P Rischard
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 10.262

4.  Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients aged over 65 years.

Authors:  Olivier Sitbon; Luke Howard
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.803

5.  Comparative outcomes in patients receiving pirfenidone or nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Manon Belhassen; Faustine Dalon; Maëva Nolin; Eric Van Ganse
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-05-04

6.  Clinical Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Right Heart Catheterizations in Community Hospitals.

Authors:  Samara M A Jansen; Anna E Huis In 't Veld; Peter Hans C G Tolen; Wouter Jacobs; H M Willemsen; Hans P Grotjohan; Marc Waskowsky; Jan van der Maten; Arno van der Weerdt; Romke Hoekstra; Ana J Pérez Matos; Maria J Overbeek; Sjoerd A Mollema; Lahssan H Hassan El Bouazzaoui; Joris W J Vriend; J Milena M Roorda; Ramon de Nooijer; Ivo van der Lee; A J Voogel; Johannes C Post; Thomas Macken; Jacqueline M Aerts; Marjo J T van de Ven; Heidi Bergman; Mirjam Bakker-de Boo; Roline C de Boer; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Frances S de Man; Harm Jan Bogaard
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.106

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.