| Literature DB >> 30510945 |
Diego García-Compeán1, Alan R Jiménez-Rodríguez2, Ángel N Del Cueto-Aguilera2, Gilberto Herrera-Quiñones2, José A González-González2, Héctor J Maldonado-Garza2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meckel's diverticulum (MD) occurs predominantly in children and adolescents. It is rarely diagnosed in adults. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to low sensitivity of the radiological imaging studies. The role of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in the diagnosis of MD is unknown, and the endoscopic patterns are not defined. We will describe four of our cases of MD evaluated with VCE and make a review of the literature focusing on the endoscopic characteristics. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Case report; Endoscopic features; Meckel’s diverticulum; Review; Video capsule endoscopy; Wireless capsule endoscopy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30510945 PMCID: PMC6265001 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Figure 1Image of ileum with video capsule endoscopy. Presence of double lumen is shown (asterisks), with one having a circumferential ulcer with irregular border (arrow).
Figure 2Image of ileum with video capsule endoscopy. A: Ulcerated polyps in the intestinal lumen (arrows); B: Double lumen (asterisks), with the lower lumen containing the polyps (arrow).
Figure 3Image of ileum with video capsule endoscopy. Double lumen (asterisks) with ulcerations in the diverticulum (arrows).
Figure 4Image of ileum with video capsule endoscopy. A: Double lumen (blue arrows) and diaphragm (white arrow); B: Severe circumferential ulcer in one of the lumens.
Clinical, demographic and pathological characteristics of 35 patients with Meckel’s diverticulum confirmed by surgery
| Male | 30 (87.5) |
| Female | 5 (12.5) |
| Age in yr, mean ± SD (range) | 24 ± 21.1 (2-80) |
| < 18 | 10 (28.5) |
| 19-39 | 14 (40) |
| 40-60 | 7 (20) |
| > 60 | 4 (11.5) |
| Symptoms | |
| Overt GIB | 26 (74.2) |
| Occult GIB | 8 (22.8) |
| Abdominal pain | 5 (14.2) |
| Duration of symptoms in mo, mean (range) | 35.1 (1–120) |
| Imaging studies prior to VCE | |
| Reported studies | 25 (71.4) |
| No reported studies | 10 (28.6) |
| CT/MRI enterography | 5 |
| CT scan | 2 |
| Push enteroscopy | 3 |
| Barium intestinal transit | 15 |
| Meckel's Scan | |
| Reported studies | 13 |
| Positive Meckel's Scan | 2 (15.3) |
| Ectopic Tissue | |
| Reported studies | 18 |
| Gastric/pancreatic | 16 (88.8) |
CT: Computed tomography; GIB: Gastrointestinal bleeding; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; VCE: Video capsule endoscopy.
Endoscopic patterns by video capsule endoscopy of 22 patients with surgically-confirmed Meckel’s diverticulum
| Double lumen | 15 (68.8) |
| Double lumen with ulcers | 9 (41) |
| Double lumen without ulcers | 6 (27.2) |
| Polypoid structure (true polyp or diverticular eversion) | 4 (18) |
| Stenotic lumen with ulcer | 3 (13.6) |
Figure 5Image of ileum with video capsule endoscopy. A: Polypoid image given by everted Meckel’s diverticulum; B: True polyps (arrow) inside the Meckel’s diverticulum.