| Literature DB >> 30510890 |
Bo Wu1, Haihua Yang2, Shenpeng Ying1, Hongsheng Lu1, Wei Wang2, Jiaming Lv1, Huacai Xiong1, Wei Hu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), local treatment failure and distant metastasis contribute largely to poor outcomes. The nasopharynx is an important lymphoid tissue, and NPC tumourigenesis and development are partly attributed to immune system disorders. Human leukocyte antigen F (HLA-F) has shown a close correlation with NPC in many genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, clinical studies rarely explore the relationship of HLA-F expression with the clinical parameters and outcomes in patients with NPC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30510890 PMCID: PMC6232804 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7691704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) ISSN: 2210-7177 Impact factor: 2.916
Association of HLA-F expression in NPC lesions with clinicopathological parameters.
| Characteristics |
| HLA-F expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Moderate | High |
| ||
| ( | ( | ( | |||
|
| |||||
| Male | 52 | 27 | 17 | 8 | 0.458 |
| Female | 22 | 8 | 9 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| <54 | 37 | 16 | 12 | 9 | 0.311 |
| ≥54 | 37 | 19 | 14 | 4 | |
|
| |||||
| Undifferentiated | 50 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 0.235 |
| Differentiated | 24 | 11 | 11 | 2 | |
|
| |||||
| T1 + T2 | 46 | 25 | 14 | 7 | 0.221 |
| T3 + T4 | 27 | 9 | 12 | 6 | |
|
| |||||
| N0 | 21 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0.389 |
| N1–3 | 52 | 22 | 19 | 11 | |
|
| |||||
| I + II | 24 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 0.179 |
| III + IV | 49 | 20 | 21 | 8 | |
|
| |||||
| No | 66 | 33 | 24 | 9 | 0.037 |
| Yes | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
|
| |||||
| No | 64 | 34 | 21 | 9 | 0.024 |
| Yes | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | |
Abbreviation: HLA-F: human leukocyte antigen F; TNM: tumour node metastasis.
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining of HLA-F expression in primary NPC lesions and chronic nasopharyngitis lesions: (a) different expression levels (1+, 2+, and 3+) of HLA-F under 50x and 200x magnification in NPC lesions; (b) different expression levels (1+, 2+, and 3+) of HLA-F under 50x and 200x magnification in chronic nasopharyngitis lesions.
Cox proportional regression analyses of variables affecting the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in NPC patients.
| Variables | Subsets | Local recurrence-free survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| ||
| HLA-F expression | High vs. low and moderate | 3.80 (1.43–10.11) | 0.008 | 3.87 (1.29–11.58) | 0.016 |
| Gender | Male vs. female | 0.41 (0.10–1.66) | 0.213 | ||
| Age (years) | <54 vs. ≥54 | 0.29 (0.06–1.46) | 0.133 | ||
| Tumour differentiation | Undifferentiated vs. differentiated | 2.01 (0.50–8.07) | 0.325 | ||
| Tumour stage | T1 + T2 vs. T3 + T4 | 5.36 (1.25–23.06) | 0.024 | 4.31 (1.01–18.46) | 0.049 |
| Lymph node status | N0 vs. N1–3 | 3.04 (0.37–24.72) | 0.299 | ||
| TNM stage | I + II vs. III + IV | 1.76 (0.35–8.75) | 0.490 | ||
Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; HLA-F: human leukocyte antigen F; TNM: tumour node metastasis.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival analyses of NPC patients: (a) comparison of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) among patients with low, moderate, and high HLA-F expression (p = 0.020); (b) comparison of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) among patients with low, moderate, and high HLA-F expression (p < 0.001); (c) comparison of overall survival (OS) among patients with low, moderate, and high HLA-F expression (p = 0.293).
Cox proportional regression analyses of variables affecting the distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in NPC patients.
| Variables | Subsets | Distant metastasis-free survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| ||
| HLA-F expression | High vs. low and moderate | 3.65 (1.53–8.73) | 0.004 | 3.65 (1.53–8.73) | 0.004 |
| Gender | Male vs. female | 0.90 (0.23–3.50) | 0.882 | ||
| Age (years) | <54 vs. ≥54 | 3.96 (0.84–18.66) | 0.082 | ||
| Tumour differentiation | Undifferentiated vs. differentiated | 0.49 (0.10–2.31) | 0.367 | ||
| Tumour stage | T1 + T2 vs. T3 + T4 | 1.49 (0.42–5.35) | 0.541 | ||
| Lymph node status | N0 vs. N1–3 | 1.58 (0.33–7.43) | 0.565 | ||
| TNM stage | I + II vs. III + IV | 4.81 (0.61–38.03) | 0.136 | ||
Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; HLA-F: human leukocyte antigen F; TNM: tumour node metastasis.
Cox proportional regression analyses of variables affecting the overall survival (OS) in NPC patients.
| Variables | Subsets | Overall survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| ||
| HLA-F expression | High vs. low and moderate | 1.76 (0.98–3.16) | 0.059 | ||
| Gender | Male vs. female | 0.93 (0.38–2.27) | 0.864 | ||
| Age (years) | <54 vs. ≥54 | 2.03 (0.83–4.99) | 0.122 | ||
| Tumour differentiation | Undifferentiated vs. differentiated | 0.69 (0.27–1.77) | 0.443 | ||
| Tumour stage | T1 + T2 vs. T3 + T4 | 2.21 (0.91–5.36) | 0.080 | ||
| Lymph node status | N0 vs. N1–3 | 1.90 (0.64–5.63) | 0.250 | ||
| TNM stage | I + II vs. III + IV | 6.25 (1.45–27.01) | 0.014 | 4.91 (1.11–21.82) | 0.037 |
| Local recurrence | No vs. yes | 1.31 (0.38–4.44) | 0.668 | ||
| Distant metastasis | No vs. yes | 4.34 (1.73–10.91) | 0.002 | 3.84 (1.17–7.59) | 0.022 |
Abbreviation: HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; HLA-F: human leukocyte antigen F; TNM: tumour node metastasis.
Figure 3Comparison of plasma sHLA-F concentrations between the NPC patients and the normal controls (p = 0.118).