Literature DB >> 30510781

A country wide adaptation of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons lung cancer core database: the Hungarian model.

Zalan Szanto1, Jozsef Furak2, Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz3, Alessandro Brunelli4, Gyoergy Lang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Registering details of thoracic surgical activity has a long tradition in Hungary. Implemented first as a procedure based register, characteristics of the treatment, complications and outcomes has been noted for the last three decades. Although the limitations of the used database hindered the scientific analysis in the dataset and restricted the possibility of benchmarking. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) database is offering a specialty-specific, procedure-specific, web-based electronic database for data contribution enabling international comparisons. Our aim was to accommodate and implement the ESTS database as the new Hungarian national thoracic surgical registry.
METHODS: In 2014, cooperation of the ESTS Database Committee and the Hungarian Society of Thoracic Surgery evolved a new structure for contributing national thoracic surgical data, called the ESTS database "Hungarian model". The European dataset was translated into Hungarian, extended questionnaire and continuous data access helped the completion of the dataset. The "Hungarian model" was incorporated into the common practice of all the thoracic surgical centers in Hungary.
RESULTS: In the first year of its implementation the "Hungarian model" of the ESTS dataset became the platform to use for contributing thoracic surgical data in Hungary. All the data included in the dataset were completed and periodically analyzed to form the annual Hungarian report ("the Hungarian Silver Book"). The dataset is permanently accessible for national scientific analysis and serves as a basis for quality improvement intentions.
CONCLUSIONS: The Hungarian model proved to be able to serve as a national database. The complete dataset of the thoracic activity has become eligible for scientific analysis and international benchmarking, highlighting the most important core messages of the ESTS database project of improving quality and patient safety thoracic surgeons. By creating a framework for a national registry the system is incorporating an alternative for other thoracic surgical societies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thoracic surgery; database; registries

Year:  2018        PMID: 30510781      PMCID: PMC6230832          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Central bronchoplastic procedures in Hungary and their outcome (198-1993)].

Authors:  A Hrívó; G Balogh; A Csekeö; L Kecskés; P Keszler; I Troján
Journal:  Orv Hetil       Date:  1996-11-17       Impact factor: 0.540

2.  Report from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database 2017: patterns of care and perioperative outcomes of surgery for malignant lung neoplasm.

Authors:  Michele Salati; Alessandro Brunelli; Herbert Decaluwe; Zalan Szanto; Marcel Dahan; Gonzalo Varela; Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  The European general thoracic surgery database project.

Authors:  Pierre Emmanuel Falcoz; Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Time to diagnosis and treatment for cancer patients in the Netherlands: Room for improvement?

Authors:  Charles C W Helsper; Nicole N F van Erp; Petra P H M Peeters; Niek N J de Wit
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Use of a national database as a tool to identify primary medication non-adherence: The Estonian ePrescription system.

Authors:  Ott Laius; Heti Pisarev; Daisy Volmer; Sulev Kõks; Aare Märtson; Katre Maasalu
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2017-10-05

6.  Respiratory analogue computer model.

Authors:  A Naszlady; L Kiss
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun

7.  Clinical decision support tools: analysis of online drug information databases.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Wallace A Marsh; Hyla H Polen; Matthew J Seamon; Blanca I Ortiz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Benchmarking facilities providing care: An international overview of initiatives.

Authors:  Frédérique Thonon; Jonathan Watson; Mahasti Saghatchian
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2015-09-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.