| Literature DB >> 30510721 |
M Mercedes Bertotto1,2, Analía Gastón3, María J Rodríguez Batiller4, Pablo Calello2.
Abstract
Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was applied to measure the Tg of rice IRGA 424 at different moisture content values (9.3%-22.3% wet basis). To conduct temperature sweeps, the samples were heated at a rate of 2°C/min from 20 to 120°C keeping frequency to 1 Hz. Tg was measured both from the E″ peak temperature (Tgmidpoint) and from the tan (δ) peak temperature (Tgendset). Tgmidpoint and Tgendset increased from 31.8 to 86.6°C and 42.1 to 104.7°C, respectively, as moisture content decreased from 22.3 to 9.3%. Six models were tested for their ability to predict Tg as a function of the moisture content. As all residuals were normally distributed and homoskedastic, standard metrics were used to assess the fitted models. Goodness of fit by these models was established by comparing the coefficient of determination (R 2), standard error of the estimate (SEE), and mean relative deviation (MRD). The Gordon-Taylor linearized equation was the most accurate in predicting Tg. To predict Tg from the moisture content of the rice samples, a new expression was proposed. For the conditions considered in this work, the developed equation satisfactorily predicts the Tg of rice IRGA 424 without needing prior linearization.Entities:
Keywords: dynamic mechanical analysis; food processing; glass transition; mathematical modeling
Year: 2018 PMID: 30510721 PMCID: PMC6261222 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Glass transition of IRGA 424 measured by differential mechanical analysis (DMA)
| Moisture content % | Tg Midpoint | Tg Endset | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean |
|
| CV | Mean |
|
| CV | Mean |
|
| CV |
| 10.21 | 1.15 | 0.66 | 11.27 | 80.36 | 10.80 | 6.24 | 13.44 | 97.42 | 12.34 | 7.12 | 12.66 |
| 13.12 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 1.59 | 65.99 | 1.70 | 0.98 | 2.57 | 80.91 | 2.91 | 1.68 | 3.60 |
| 14.48 | 0.45 | 0.26 | 3.11 | 61.81 | 2.41 | 1.39 | 3.89 | 74.90 | 3.65 | 2.11 | 4.88 |
| 15.59 | 0.43 | 0.25 | 2.77 | 54.74 | 3.90 | 2.25 | 7.12 | 75.91 | 3.74 | 2.16 | 4.93 |
| 17.37 | 0.55 | 0.32 | 3.16 | 53.05 | 4.40 | 2.54 | 8.29 | 65.95 | 9.89 | 5.71 | 15.00 |
| 18.15 | 0.71 | 0.41 | 3.91 | 40.16 | 0.94 | 0.54 | 2.33 | 47.55 | 6.14 | 3.55 | 12.91 |
| 19.78 | 0.52 | 0.30 | 2.65 | 34.79 | 2.79 | 1.61 | 8.02 | 42.07 | 2.36 | 1.36 | 5.60 |
| 21.68 | 0.84 | 0.48 | 3.87 | 34.49 | 4.55 | 2.63 | 13.18 | 43.05 | 1.54 | 0.89 | 3.58 |
where SEM: standard error of the mean; SD: standard deviation; CV: variation coefficient; A: each value in the data set; : mean of all values in the data set; N: number of values in the data set.
Figure 1Storage modulus E′, loss modulus E″, and tan (δ) as a function of temperature, in degree Celsius, °C of samples of rice flour IRGA 424 with MC of 15.61% w.b.
Results of Levene's and Shapiro–Wilk tests. At the 0.05 level, the data were significantly drawn from a normally distributed population
| Model Name | Tg |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levene's Test | Shapiro–Wilk Test | ||
| Jenkel | Midpoint | 0.22 | 0.49 |
| Gordon and Taylor | 0.29 | 0.99 | |
| Linearized Gordon and Taylor | 0.19 | 0.92 | |
| Kwei | 0.31 | 0.22 | |
| New equation | 0.32 | 0.30 | |
| Jenkel | Endset | 0.23 | 0.45 |
| Gordon and Taylor | 0.38 | 0.60 | |
| Linearized Gordon and Taylor | 0.10 | 0.41 | |
| Kwei | 0.23 | 0.45 | |
| New equation | 0.20 | 0.40 | |
The regression coefficients and the statistical values of the fitted models
| Tg | Model Name | Properties of regression coefficients |
|
| SEE | MRD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Value |
|
|
| DEP | ||||||
| Midpoint | Gordon Taylor | k | 0.35 | 0.01 | 66.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24.18 | 0.91 | 4.92 | 8.28 |
| Kwei | k | 0.17 | 0.02 | 8.43 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 17.29 | 0.93 | 4.16 | 6.72 | |
| q | 11.60 | 33.40 | 0.35 | 0.73 | 0.97 | ||||||
| Jenkel | k | −417.32 | 10.20 | −40.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 47.03 | 0.82 | 6.86 | 11.52 | |
| Linear Gordon Taylor | k | 0.35 | 0.01 | 66.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 5.02 | 3.83 | ||
| NE | a | 160.27 | 2.88 | 5.58 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 17.23 | 0.93 | 17.20 | 3.83 | |
| k | −5.38 | 0.36 | −14.87 | 0.00 | 0.91 | ||||||
| Endset | Gordon Taylor | k | 0.42 | 0.01 | 46.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 43.04 | 0.89 | 6.56 | 9.26 |
| Kwei | k | 1.00 | 411.19 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 41.16 | 0.90 | 6.42 | 9.2 | |
| q | −329.81 | 64928.28 | −0.01 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Jenkel | −329.84 | 9.33 | −35.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 39.37 | 0.90 | 6.27 | 9.2 | ||
| Linear Gordon Taylor | k | 0.37 | 0.01 | 68.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 5.36 | 3.28 | ||
| NE | a | 183.95 | 4.20 | 43.8 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 41.7 | 0.89 | 42.45 | 8.74 | |
| k | 4.05 | 0.45 | −8.9 | 9.26E−12 | 0.90 | ||||||
: reduced chi‐squared; : adjusted chi‐squared; NE: new equation; SEE: standard error of the estimate; MRD: mean relative deviation, DEP: dependency.
Figure 2Normality plot (percentiles vs. residues) of the new equation
Figure 3The dependence of Tg on moisture content (% w.b.) of samples of rice IRGA 424, as well as the fitted models. (a) Tgmidpoint and (b) Tgendset
Published data on Tg of rice kernel and flour as compared to Tg rice flour
| Reference | Method | Samples | Variety |
| Tg |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This study |
DMA | Brown flour | IRGA 424 LG | 10–22 |
| 0.93 |
| Cao et al. ( | DSC | Brown kernel | Akitakomachi SG | 12–25 | Tg (°C) = 81.19 − 2.39 | 0.93 |
| L201 LG | 12–25 | Tg (°C) = 65.46 − 1.33 | 0.92 | |||
| Delta LG | 12‐25 | Tg (°C) = 60.62 − 1.22 | 0.69 | |||
| Chen et al. ( |
DMA | Brown kernel | Jing Rice No.3 SG | 14.2 | 57 | |
| FuFengYou 11 LG | 10.9, 13.8, 17.4 | 66, 58, 45 | ||||
| Jia et al. ( |
DMA | Brown kernel | LiaoJing SG | 16.0 | 50 | |
| R894 MG | 12.5, 16, 18.1 | 56, 50, 47 | ||||
| IR‐2 LG | 15.9 | 55 | ||||
| Siebenmorgen et al., |
DMTA | Brown kernel | Drew LG | 7–22 | Tg (°C) = 100.5 − 3.34 | 0.81 |
| Bengal MG | 7‐22 | Tg (°C) = 100.7 − 3.25 | 0.82 | |||
| Sun et al. ( | TMA | Brownkernel | Drew LG | 7.6‐21.7 | Tg (°C) = 59.47 − 1.17 | 0.57 |
| Perdon et al., | TMA | Brown kernel | Bengal MG | 3–27 | Tg (°C) = 53.63 − 0.88 | 0.54 |
| Brown kernel | Cypress LG | 3–27 | Tg (°C) = 56.27 − 1.08 | 0.38 | ||
| Plattner et al. ( | PTA | Flour |
|
|
|
|
| Thuc et al. ( | TMCT | Brown flour | YRM64 LG | 12,14.4, 16, 16.3 | 56.7, 47.7, 41.6, 40.38 | |
| Brown kernel | YRM64 LG | 10, 14, 17 | 54.8, 48.6, 40.9. | |||
| Talab et al. ( | DSC | Brown kernel | MR219 | 7.4–26.8 | 9.65–61.79 |
|
| Nithya 2014 | PTA | Roasted flour | Bengal MG | 9–27 | 160–80 |
|
TMCT: thermal mechanical compression test, DSC: differential scanning calorimetry; MDSC: modulated differential scanning calorimetry; TMA: thermomechanical analysis; DMTA: dynamic mechanical thermal analysis; PTA: phase transition analyzer; SG: short grain; MG: medium grain; LG: long grain; NR: not reported.
Values plotted in Figure 4 were taken from Siebenmorgen et al. (2004).
Figure 4Comparison between reported Tg values from the literature and Tgmidpoint values obtained in this study