| Literature DB >> 30510699 |
Jun-Hoi Kim1, Il Kyung Chung2, Hak Yoon Kim3, Kyung-Min Kim1.
Abstract
We evaluated the direct application of different extracts from plant-derived compounds at different ratios. The best effect was observed with the combination of 18.18% clove, 9.90% cinnamon, 9.09% licorice, 4.55% firmament, 4.55% grapefruit seed extract, and 54.54% apple cider vinegar. The combination of these compounds improved the moisture content of the fruit and showed antifungal, antibrowning, and antifungal/antibrowning effects as compared with the control following 6-week treatment. The treatment resulted in an increase in the overall sugar concentration of dried persimmons. Antibrowning/antifungal test showed high sugar content of 30-39 °brix. The hardness of the treatment groups was similar to that of the control and decreased by 0.5 to 0.8 after 6 weeks. The evaluation of color change revealed a decreasing tendency in the value of △E during the drying period. Thus, natural extracts effectively suppressed the quality degradation during drying of persimmon and may be used to replace sulfur fumigation.Entities:
Keywords: drying; extraction/separation; food quality; food safety
Year: 2018 PMID: 30510699 PMCID: PMC6261229 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Changes in the water content with antibrowning, antifungal, and antibrowning/antifungal treatments during 6‐week drying of persimmon. C: control, numbers are according to materials and method
| Solution | Water content (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 week | 2 weeks | 3 weeks | 4 weeks | 5 weeks | 6 weeks | |
| 1 | 60.5 ± 2.8 | 40.7 ± 17.9 | 65.1 ± 3.1 | 68.7 ± 8.7 | 75.4 ± 3.8 | 71.0 ± 2.3b |
| 19 | 60.5 ± 1.9 | 58.3 ± 15.3 | 67.8 ± 6.7 | 65.0 ± 3.6 | 77.5 ± 4.2 | 73.2 ± 2.9a |
| 20 | 60.9 ± 4.0 | 62.5 ± 5.9 | 66.1 ± 2.2 | 69.8 ± 6.6 | 78.9 ± 6.4 | 71.8 ± 2.1b |
| 21 | 59.4 ± 3.5 | 63.1 ± 1.0 | 67.9 ± 3.6 | 68.2 ± 1.8 | 79.2 ± 2.6 | 75.8 ± 1.5a |
| 35 | 61.0 ± 3.3 | 66.9 ± 3.4 | 61.6 ± 4.7 | 66.8 ± 1.7 | 75.7 ± 2.9 | 72.8 ± 1.8b |
| 36 | 62.7 ± 2.0 | 65.2 ± 1.6 | 63.7 ± 3.6 | 67.2 ± 0.7 | 78.7 ± 1.3 | 75.5 ± 3.5a |
| 37 | 61.1 ± 3.7 | 67.2 ± 3.2 | 65.9 ± 2.0 | 65.0 ± 2.6 | 76.3 ± 6.5 | 73.4 ± 2.2a |
| 38 | 59.6 ± 1.7 | 68.1 ± 3.3 | 63.5 ± 3.2 | 66.2 ± 0.7 | 75.1 ± 4.8 | 76.1 ± 2.9a |
| 39 | 61.2 ± 3.8 | 72.3 ± 6.2 | 64.2 ± 4.8 | 66.4 ± 3.1 | 77.0 ± 1.0 | 73.2 ± 2.0a |
Results are presented as means ± standard deviation of three replicates. DMRT analysis was performed at 6 weeks.
Figure 1Antibrowning effects of medicinal plant extracts and food additives on dried persimmons. 1: Control(untreated control plot), 2: True Control (distilled water), 3: 3% Citric acid, 4: 1% Vitamin C, 5: 3% Citric acid +1% Vitamin C, 6: 1% Potassium meta‐bisulfite, 7: 1% acetic acid, 8: 3% acetic acid, 9: 1% grapefruit seed extract, 10: 5% chrysanthemum indicum, 11: 5% licorice, 12: 5% green tea, 13: 5% cinnamon, 14: 5% clove, 15: 5% cnidium, 16: 5% turmeric, 17: 2% polyphosphate, 18: Cider vinegar (Acidity of about 5%), 19: mix proportion A = Cider vinegar 50: 3% Citric acid 20: 5% licorice 20: 5% cinnamon 10, 20: mix proportion B = Cider vinegar 60: 3% Citric acid 10: 5% licorice 20: 5% cinnamon 10, 21: mix proportion C = Cider vinegar 70: 3% Citric acid 10: 5% licorice 10: 5% cinnamon 10
Changes in the sugar content with antibrowning, antifungal, and antibrowning/antifungal treatments during 6‐week drying of persimmon. C: control, numbers are according to materials and method
| Solution | Sugar content (◦brix) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 week | 2 weeks | 3 weeks | 4 weeks | 5 weeks | 6 weeks | |
| 1 | 20.9 ± 0.3 | 23.8 ± 0.8 | 27.2 ± 2.5 | 27.7 ± 4.9 | 27.7 ± 0.5 | 35.8 ± 4.7a |
| 19 | 19.0 ± 2.4 | 22.1 ± 2.4 | 25.2 ± 4.2 | 29.6 ± 3.2 | 31.7 ± 4.1 | 34.2 ± 2.5b |
| 20 | 20.6 ± 2.0 | 20.1 ± 2.9 | 25.4 ± 3.2 | 28.0 ± 1.7 | 31.1 ± 2.0 | 37.6 ± 1.9a |
| 21 | 18.1 ± 0.2 | 20.0 ± 1.3 | 23.9 ± 3.8 | 25.9 ± 5.9 | 28.5 ± 3.7 | 33.1 ± 1.7b |
| 35 | 20.3 ± 1.2 | 20.4 ± 0.6 | 24.5 ± 2.7 | 32.3 ± 1.5 | 29.9 ± 2.4 | 28.8 ± 2.5c |
| 36 | 20.9 ± 1.4 | 22.0 ± 1.3 | 38.5 ± 15.4 | 28.3 ± 6.6 | 28.2 ± 0.8 | 32.1 ± 3.0b |
| 37 | 16.0 ± 1.0 | 20.1 ± 2.0 | 24.8 ± 2.6 | 31.4 ± 0.6 | 33.3 ± 5.3 | 32.2 ± 2.0b |
| 38 | 18.8 ± 2.1 | 21.5 ± 1.1 | 25.0 ± 3.8 | 28.7 ± 3.3 | 30.1 ± 2.3 | 34.6 ± 2.5a |
| 39 | 17.6 ± 1.4 | 24.3 ± 1.8 | 25.2 ± 4.4 | 29.5 ± 3.2 | 29.8 ± 3.5 | 31.3 ± 1.1c |
Results are presented as means ± standard deviation of three replicates. DMRT analysis was performed at 6 weeks.
Figure 2Antifungal effects of medicinal plant extracts and food additives on dried persimmons. 1: Control(untreated control plot), 22: 3% Citric acid +1% Vitamin C, 23: 1% Potassium meta‐bisulfite, 24: 1% acetic acid, 25: 3% acetic acid, 26: 5% acetic acid, 27: 3% grapefruit seed extract, 28: 5% grapefruit seed extract, 29: 2% polyphosphate, 30: 50% ethanol cinnamon extract, 31: 50% ethanol licorice extract, 32: 50% ethanol clove extract, 33: 50% ethanol cnidium extract, 34: Cider vinegar (Acidity of about 5%), 35: mix proportion A = Cider vinegar 50: cinnamon extract 20: 5% grapefruit seed extract 10: licorice 10: cnidium 5.5: clove 4.5, 36: mix proportion B = Cider vinegar 50: clove extract 20: 5% grapefruit seed extract 10: cinnamon 10: licorice 5.5: cinnamon 4.5, 37: mix proportion C = Cider vinegar 70: cinnamon extract 15: licorice 10: cnidium 4.5: clove 0.5
Changes in hardness with antibrowning, antifungal, and antibrowning/antifungal treatments and during 6‐week persimmon drying. C: control, numbers are according to materials and method. It is the period that represents the best value of the product in dried persimmon
| Solution | Hardness (kg/mm2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 week | 2 weeks | 3 weeks | 4 weeks | 5 weeks | 6 weeks | |
| 1 | 2.2 ± 2.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1a |
| 19 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1b |
| 20 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.1a |
| 21 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1a |
| 35 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1b |
| 36 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0b |
| 37 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.0b |
| 38 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.3b |
| 39 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.2a |
Results were presented as means ± standard deviation of three replicates. DMRT analysis was performed at 6 weeks.
Changes in the color difference with antibrowning, antifungal, and antibrowning/antifungal treatments during 4‐6 week drying of persimmon. C: control, numbers are according to materials and method
| Solution | Color difference | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 week | 2 weeks | 3 weeks | ||||||||||
|
|
|
| ∆ |
|
|
| ∆ |
|
|
| ∆ | |
| 1 | 1.4 ± 13.9 | 6.3 ± 3.7 | 70.0 ± 17.7 | 71.1 ± 18.7 | 36.6 ± 7.1 | 14.0 ± 6.1 | 51.0 ± 16.8 | 69.6 ± 21.1 | 51.1 ± 3.5 | 17.8 ± 1.7 | 61.2 ± 5.9 | 81.7 ± 6.2 |
| 19 | 4.9 ± 2.4 | 3.9 ± 1.8 | 73.6 ± 3.1 | 73.9 ± 3.2 | 44.5 ± 6.8 | 10.9 ± 2.2 | 47.5 ± 9.9 | 66.0 ± 12.1 | 51.2 ± 9.3 | 16.1 ± 1.5 | 59.8 ± 9.5 | 80.4 ± 12.6 |
| 20 | 19.3 ± 2.1 | 8.3 ± 1.6 | 91.7 ± 1.8 | 94.1 ± 2.1 | 44.6 ± 6.0 | 8.2 ± 3.6 | 47.8 ± 10.0 | 65.9 ± 11.8 | 46.6 ± 7.4 | 12.0 ± 3.6 | 51.1 ± 12.8 | 70.2 ± 14.8 |
| 21 | 9.6 ± 3.0 | 10.1 ± 1.8 | 82.2 ± 2.3 | 83.4 ± 2.7 | 39.6 ± 30.8 | 9.1 ± 7.1 | 56.8 ± 16.8 | 77.7 ± 19.3 | 39.9 ± 4.1 | 9.2 ± 1.9 | 43.2 ± 3.8 | 59.7 ± 5.5 |
| 35 | 5.4 ± 9.9 | 9.8 ± 2.7 | 76.2 ± 13.9 | 77.3 ± 15.0 | 48.2 ± 7.5 | 9.0 ± 3.3 | 49.5 ± 10.4 | 69.7 ± 13.0 | 57.1 ± 4.5 | 16.4 ± 1.6 | 67.5 ± 5.5 | 89.9 ± 7.2 |
| 36 | −1.0 ± 4.0 | 5.0 ± 3.0 | 66.6 ± 5.5 | 67.0 ± 5.7 | 45.0 ± 2.9 | 9.8 ± 2.1 | 50.0 ± 6.0 | 68.0 ± 6.5 | 39.2 ± 7.4 | 26.8 ± 37.9 | 41.0 ± 9.5 | 57.4 ± 12.3 |
| 37 | 7.8 ± 4.2 | 7.5 ± 5.3 | 78.1 ± 9.1 | 79.0 ± 9.8 | 46.6 ± 2.2 | 8.4 ± 0.8 | 51.0 ± 4.3 | 69.6 ± 4.7 | 45.9 ± 5.0 | 12.7 ± 2.9 | 51.9 ± 8.3 | 51.4 ± 28.9 |
| 38 | 6.6 ± 2.6 | 4.4 ± 1.9 | 73.1 ± 3.3 | 73.6 ± 2.9 | 43.2 ± 8.4 | 9.9 ± 1.5 | 46.4 ± 10.3 | 44.2 ± 21.6 | 40.3 ± 4.6 | 6.4 ± 1.7 | 43.4 ± 7.8 | 59.6 ± 9.0 |
| 39 | 10.0 ± 7.2 | 5.5 ± 2.4 | 79.1 ± 10.0 | 80.1 ± 10.8 | 42.4 ± 7.4 | 4.9 ± 2.8 | 40.2 ± 8.4 | 58.6 ± 11.1 | 45.4 ± 6.7 | 12.0 ± 5.1 | 51.5 ± 11.0 | 69.8 ± 13.3 |
L, Lightness; a, redness; b, yellowness; ∆E, ∆E*ab. Results are presented as means ± standard deviation of three replicates. DMRT analysis was performed at 6 weeks.