Literature DB >> 30510651

Underlying risk factors and their relationship with extent of coronary vessel involvement in patients undergoing coronary angiography in North of Iran.

Fahimeh Kazemian1, Seyed Farzad Jalali2, Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki3, Afsaneh Arzani4,5, Kamyar Amin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most progressive and life-threatening diseases and is the first leading cause of death affecting both genders in Iran. The present study aimed to determine the extent of coronary vessel involvement and relevant relationship with several underlying risk factors.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 1452 patients undergoing angiography who met the inclusion criteria were recruited consecutively in Babol, Iran during 2016. Data collection was performed through a questionnaire including demographic and clinical characteristics and information on underlying diseases via an interview with the patient and looking into the patients' records.
RESULTS: Of these patients, 459 (31.6%) had normal coronary arteries, 220 (15.1%) suffered from non-obstructive CAD and 773 (53.3%) had one, two or three-vessel obstructive involvement. The results of multiple logistic regression showed that the chances of having coronary artery involvement in patients with diabetes (OR=1.55, p=0.012), age> 60 years old (OR=3.52, P=0.001), male gender (OR=2.54, P=0.001), history of heart attack (OR=3.16, P=0.001), and history of hospitalization because of cardiac problem (OR=1.51, P=0.021) significantly increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes, male gender, age over 60 years old, history of myocardial infarction and history of hospitalization due to cardiac problem were related to the extent of coronary vessels involvement. Therefore, it is recommended to practice preventive measures more extensively in this regard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Coronary Vessels; Risk factors

Year:  2018        PMID: 30510651      PMCID: PMC6230462          DOI: 10.22088/cjim.9.4.361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med        ISSN: 2008-6164


Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most common chronic, progressive and life-threatening diseases around the world (1,2). It is the cause of one third of mortality rates in the world (2). It imposes huge economic losses on the society more than any other diseases (1). This is also the major cause of disability in the patients (3). The prevalence of this disease is increasing in the developing countries rapidly so that in recent years, 78% mortality rate has been attributed to CAD in these countries (2, 3). In Iran, according to statistics, 46% mortality rate because of cardiovascular diseases was reported, that is the first leading cause of death in both genders (4,5). In the past, the disease was more common in the elderly, but nowadays young people are also facing it (6). The clinical spectrum of coronary heart disease varies from asymptomatic ischemia to chronic stable angina, unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic cardiomyopathy, sudden cardiac death, arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock (7). Also, the disease is divided into two groups of obstructive (stenosis more than 50% of diameter of the vessel) and non-obstructive (stenosis less than 50% of diameter of the vessel) (8). Although coronary artery disease is one of the major health care problems in modern societies, by determination, control of risk factors, correct diagnosis and treatment can prevent many deaths caused by it (9). There are many underlying risk factors for this disease including male sexuality, smoking or being near smoking people, overweight and obesity, inappropriate diet, high blood pressure and hypertension, diabetes, hormone therapy, psychological factors such as depression and stress (10-12). Many studies have shown the relationship between some of these underlying factors with the severity of coronary artery involvement with different results in this regard (6- 7, 11). The abnormal changes in the ECG and positive CRP can be an underlying risk factor for the disease (13). Multiple invasive and non-invasive methods are used to determine the severity and extent of CAD but ultimately, angiography is the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis (5, 14). Due to increasing prevalence of atherosclerotic CAD, coronary artery angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions are used extensively as standard methods for examining coronary anatomy and treating atherosclerotic lesions over the last few decades (15). Because of the high-demand for angiography at the cardiac center in Babol, and extensive literature review of relevant papers by the authors showed that no knowledge existed in the relation of the number of involved coronary vessels and its association with underlying risk factors in patients undergoing angiography. In regard to the importance of the topic, the present study aimed to determine the extent of involved coronary vessels with its association to some underlying risk factors in Babol, North of Iran in 2016.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1452 patients who underwent angiography at Ayatollah Rouhani Teaching Hospital in Babol during 2016. All patients who required angiography that referred from the clinics of cardiologist to Babol angiography center were entered into this study by census. Participants with history of angiography or angioplasty, chronic cardiac failure, congenital heart disease, history of cardiac surgery, aged less than 18, loss of consciousness or inability to communicate verbally were excluded from this study. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Babol University of Medical Sciences (No. 306446) and all patients had given an informed written consent and ethical issues on the confidentiality of information the patients were considered. Demographic and clinical characteristics were age, gender, place of residence, education, history of smoking, smoking spouse, addiction, hypertension, hyperglycemia, family medical history hospitalization history owing to cardiovascular diseases, history of myocardial infarction and stroke and the severity of coronary artery involvement. Data collection was performed through a questionnaire in two parts. In the first step, demographic data and clinical information on underlying diseases were collected through an interview with the patient and patients’ records prior to angiography. In the second part of questionnaire, the results of angiography after doing angiography by the cardiologist were documented from angiographic report papers. Angiography results encompassed: normal state, non-obstructive involvement (less than 50%) and one, two, and three-vessel coronary artery stenosis (more than 50% involvement). Number of vessel and extent of involvement were our primary outcome. In the statistical analysis, we used SPSS Version 14. Categorical data was analyzed using chi-square statistical test for quantitative data in our comparison. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of risk factor on the extended at least one vessel coronary involvement. The effect of other risk factors as covariate had been adjusted. Confidence interval in this study was 95% and significant level was less than 0.05.

Results

Of the 1452 patients understudy, 663 (45.6%) were males and 789 (54.4%) were females. The mean and standard deviation of the age of the patients were 57.8±11 years. Among all the patients, 459 (31.6%) individuals had normal coronary artery, 220 (15.1%) patients suffered from non-obstructive involvement and 773 (53.3%) had obstructive involvement of 1, 2 or 3 vessels. According to chi-square test, patients aged 41-60 years needed angiography more than others and the most extensive coronary artery involvement (obstruction in three vessels) was observed in those aged over 60 years (table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of the participants, based on the extent of involvement and its relationship with gender and age

Extent of involvemen t Varibles Normal N(%) non-obstructive involvement N(%) Obstruction
Tota l P-value
vessel involved N(%) 2 vessels involved N(%) 3 vessels involved N(%)
15 (17.5)Age groups48(55.8)15 (17.5)12 (14)6 (6.9)5 (8.5)860.001
135(17.15)272 (34.8)135(17.15)129 (16.4)129 (16.4)120(15.5)787
70 (12.1)137 (23.7)70 (12.1)91(15.1)126 (21.8)155 (26.8)579
220 (15.1)459 (13.6)220 (15.1)232 (15.9)261 (17.9)280 (19.2)1452
72 (10.8)Sex176 (26.5)72 (10.8)113 (7.8)141 (9.7)16 (19.1)6630.001
148 (18.7)28 (35)148 (18.7)119 (8.2)120 (8.3)119 (8.2)789
Distribution of the participants, based on the extent of involvement and its relationship with gender and age There was no significant difference between the mean age of men and women who required angiography (p=0.6). There was a significant difference between men and women, in terms of the results of the CAD (p<0.001). The prevalence of hypertension (36% vs. 58%), hyperlipidemia (39% vs. 56%) and diabetes (23/8% vs. 39%) was higher in women and history of heart attacks (17.3% vs. 9.8%) was higher in men (p<0.001). We used chi-square test to compare two groups with CAD (stenosis< 50% and stenosis> 50%) in terms of some variables. History of heart attack (5% vs. 18.7%, p<0.001), history of hospitalization due to cardiac problems (27.2% vs. 41.7%, p<0.001) and smoking (10% vs. 16.7%, p=0.01) were significantly higher in the second group (stenosis> 50%) than the first group; however, the variable of having a smoker spouse (22% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001) in the first group (stenosis< 50%) was significantly higher than the second group. The patients in the stenosis> 50% group were also placed into three groups in terms of the number of involved vessels (1, 2 or 3 vessels) and were compared in terms of associated risk factors. The difference between the three groups was significant only in terms of the variable of history of heart attack (p=0.04). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of the mean duration of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, duration of smoking and addiction; however, there were significant differences between the groups in terms of duration of diabetes (p=0.04). There was no significant difference between the urban and rural patients in terms of the number of involved vessels (p=0.3). Table 2 indicated significant relationships between variables of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, addiction, having a smoker spouse, history of heart attack, hospitalization history due to cardiac disease with the extent of coronary artery involvement (p<0.05).
Table 2

Distribution of the participants, based on the underlying factors and their association with the results of angiography

Extent of involvement Without involvement N(%) Nonobstructive stenosis N(%) Obstructive stenosis Total N(%) P-value
Underlying Factors 1 Vessel N(%) 2 Vessels N(%) 3 Vessels N(%)
Hypertension 200 (28.7)108 (15.5)112 (16)133 (19)143 (20.5)696 (48)0.02
Hyperlipidemia 201 (28)119 (17)126 (17.9)129 (18.3)129 (18.3)704 (48.4)0.4
Diabetes mellitus110 (23.5)70 (15)86 (18.4)84 (18)117 (25)467 (34)0.001
Smoking36 (19.2)11.7) 22)31 (16.5)47 (25)51 (27.2)187 (12.8)0.001
Smoker spouse71 (32.8)48 (22.2)34 (15.7)28 (13)35 (16.2)216 (14.8)0.04
Addiction21 (18.2)13 (11.3)14.7) 17)29 (25.2)35 (30.4)115 (8)0.001
Heart attack history37 (19)11 (5.7)31 (16)28) 54)31) 60)193 (13.2)0.001
History of stroke18 (27.6)12.3) 8)13 (20)18.4) 12)21.5) 14)65 (4.5)0.4
History of heart hospitalization126 (24.7)11.8) 60)86 (16.9)21.6) 110)25) 127)509 (35)0.001
Family history of heart disease191 (31.1)17) 104)87 (14.1)105 (17.1)127 (20.6)614 (42.2)0.75
Distribution of the participants, based on the underlying factors and their association with the results of angiography In the final analysis, the variables were inserted into the multiple logistic regression models using backward method. As table 3 shows, factors such as age over 40, hypertension, diabetes, gender, smoking, hospitalization due to cardiac problems and history of heart attack were the influential variables. Although, variables of hypertension and smoking had no significant effect on increasing the chances of obstructive involvement compared to non-obstructive involvement (the OR and p-value of the above variables are shown in table 3).
Table 3

Adjusted odds ratio of the underlying factors of coronary artery disease, (95% confidence interval in multiple logistic regression analysis)

Variables OR (1) ( 95% CI) N=1452 P value OR (2) (95% CI) N=993 P value (3)
positivenegativeHypertension1.23 (0.97-1.56) Ref0.092Ref---
positivenegativeDiabetes mellitus1.86 (1.42-2.42) Ref0.0011.55 (1.10-2.18) Ref0.012
positivenegativeSmoking1.99 (1.30-3.04) Ref0.001--------------
malefemaleSex1.52 (1.17-1.96) Ref0.0012.54 (1.83-3.54) Ref0.001
positivenegativeHeart attack history1.55 (1.04-2.32) Ref0.0313.16 (1.643-6.097) Ref0.001
positivenegativeHistory of heart hospitalization1.39 (1.08-1.81) Ref0.0121.51 (1.06-2.15) Ref0.021
41-60 y< 40 yAge2.32 (1.44-3.67) Ref0.0011.81 (0.88-3.89) Ref0.103
> 60 y< 40 y3.98 (2.44-6.67) Ref0.0013.52 (1.69-7.33) Ref0.001

Adjusted odds ratio of the underlying factors of coronary artery disease vs. no coronary artery disease

Adjusted odds ratio of the underlying factors of obstructive involvement vs. Nonobstructive involvement

wald statistics using logistic regression

Adjusted odds ratio of the underlying factors of coronary artery disease, (95% confidence interval in multiple logistic regression analysis) Adjusted odds ratio of the underlying factors of coronary artery disease vs. no coronary artery disease Adjusted odds ratio of the underlying factors of obstructive involvement vs. Nonobstructive involvement wald statistics using logistic regression

Discussion

Based on the findings of this study, there were significant relationships between the extent of coronary artery involvement with some underlying risk factors such as age, male gender, diabetes, smoking, history of heart attack and history of hospitalization due to cardiac problem and duration of diabetes. The results of this study showed that there was no significant relationship between the extent of involvement of coronary and variables of hyperlipidemia and history of stroke. In line with the findings of our study, Masoumi and Nasri et al. found that there was no significant relationship between the extent of coronary artery involvement and hyperlipidemia (16). Similar to the results of the present study, Golmohammadi et al. found that there was significant relationship between the number of involved coronary arteries with the variables of age and history of heart attack. But contrary to the results of our study no significant difference was observed in term of gender (17). It is worth mentioning that the number of samples in our research has been almost five times the size of the above study. In this study, patients with cardiac history and those with hospitalization history because of cardiac problem, the probability of developing coronary artery involvement were 1.5 and 1.3 times more than the normal people, respectively. One-vessel and three-vessel involvement were the lowest and highest prevalent types of involvement in our finding which was similar to the findings of other studies (17- 18). Nonetheless, our results are not consistent with the findings of Calvet and Hosseini et al.’s studies (19-20). Nough et al. showed that two-vessel involvement was the most common type of involvement; nevertheless, it was the least common type in other studies (15- 16, 21). These differences can be attributed to the sample size, data collection method, time period and geographical region. In another study among older patients showed that one-vessel stenosis was more common among women and on the other hand, two and three-vessel stenosis were more common in men and this is similar to the findings of the present study (20). Whereas in another study showed that all types of involvement (one, two and three-vessel involvements) were significantly higher in men, which is to some extent consistent with the results of our study. In the present study, men were mostly suffering from cases of stenosis> 50%; while, women were mostly suffering from stenosis< 50% cases. Unlike these results, in a study conducted by Mohseni et al., no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of gender (22). Inconsistent with the result of the present study, Parsa et al. showed that there was no significant relationship between the two groups in terms of smoking (23). Despite the fact that smoking is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (24); Aygul et al. argue that hypertension and diabetes are significantly less common among smokers and this is similar to the findings of the present study (25). A similarity to our finding, in previous studies also the mean age of patients undergoing angiography was reported to be approximately 55-60 years (16, 21, 26). Unlike other studies, we did not find a significance difference between men and women in terms of their mean age (13, 21). Moreover in patients over the age of 60, the probability of obstructive involvement was three times larger than that of non-obstructive involvement. Previous studies have also shown that the severity of coronary artery involvement significantly increases over time (17, 20). In the curent study, most of the individuals admitted to Babol angiography center were men, which is similar to most studies conducted in different Iranian cities (7, 16, 20- 21,26).The results of other studies show that women had significantly higher normal angiography cases than men (27- 28). In this regard, Khalili et al. studied a population of Iranian men and women over 10 years and reported that the prevalence of CAD in men is almost twice that of women (29). In the present study, the prevalence of coronary artery involvement was 1.5 times higher in men; while in Mohammad’s study, men were 3.4 times more likely to experience coronary artery involvement (6). The findings of the written study showed that the frequency of risk factors was significantly lower in those with normal angiography than that of the patients. In the study of Bidel et al., there was no significant difference between normal people and patients, in terms of high hyperlipidemia levels, which contradicts the result of the present study (24). This study found that the prevalence of risk factors of diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension was significantly higher in women than in men. Surprisingly, despite the lower prevalence of these factors in men, normal angiography was more prevalent in women than men. Unlike the foregoing findings, another study showed that diabetes and hyperlipidemia were more prevalent in men than in women but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hypertension(7). Similar to the findings of the present study, the multivariate logistic regression model used in the study of Bidel et al. showed that the probability of developing coronary artery involvement is directly correlated with the variables of smoking, hypertension, male gender and a history of cardiovascular diseases in the family. Nonetheless, their study showed that hyperlipidemia was associated with an increased risk of coronary involvement, which is not consistent with the present study (24). We found in our study, the probability of developing obstructive coronary artery involvement in diabetic patients was 1.5 times higher than that of non-obstructive involvement. In this regard, Masoumi (16) and Nasri et al. in their study showed that in diabetic patients, the risk of two or three-vessel involvement was twice more than that of one-vessel involvement; while, this ratio was 1.2 in the study of Hosseini et al. (30). The findings of this study include some limitations. It is worth noting that since some of the data in this study are based on a self-report approach, they may be sensitive to biases such as patient claim. Moreover, psychosocial factors may prevent patients from answering honestly to some questions about addiction. This study design is a cross-sectional in nature, thus it must be a caution in interpreting of causal association of risk factors with visual involvement. Whaterer way, one of the strengths of this study was large sample size which represents higher reliability of our results. On the other hand, this study investigated the relationship between the extent of coronary artery involvement with the duration of the risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, as well as the duration of smoking and addiction. These relationships have not been addressed in previous studies. In conclusion, our study showed that diabetes, smoking, history of heart hospitalization were correlated with the CAD; but, the age of over 60, male gender, history of heart attack with more than twice chance of obstructive involvement. Therefore, authorities are recommended to hold effective training courses on preventive measures in this area.
  10 in total

1.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Gilles Montalescot; Udo Sechtem; Stephan Achenbach; Felicita Andreotti; Chris Arden; Andrzej Budaj; Raffaele Bugiardini; Filippo Crea; Thomas Cuisset; Carlo Di Mario; J Rafael Ferreira; Bernard J Gersh; Anselm K Gitt; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Nikolaus Marx; Lionel H Opie; Matthias Pfisterer; Eva Prescott; Frank Ruschitzka; Manel Sabaté; Roxy Senior; David Paul Taggart; Ernst E van der Wall; Christiaan J M Vrints; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Juhani Knuuti; Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Marc J Claeys; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Cetin Erol; Herbert Frank; Christian Funck-Brentano; Oliver Gaemperli; José R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Michalis Hamilos; David Hasdai; Steen Husted; Stefan K James; Kari Kervinen; Philippe Kolh; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Massimo F Piepoli; Axel R Pries; Francesco Romeo; Lars Rydén; Maarten L Simoons; Per Anton Sirnes; Ph Gabriel Steg; Adam Timmis; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Aylin Yildirir; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Prevalence of asymptomatic coronary artery disease in ischemic stroke patients: the PRECORIS study.

Authors:  David Calvet; Emmanuel Touzé; Olivier Varenne; Jean-Louis Sablayrolles; Simon Weber; Jean-Louis Mas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Identifying women with severe angiographic coronary disease.

Authors:  C Kreatsoulas; M K Natarajan; R Khatun; J L Velianou; S S Anand
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Comparison of traditional risk factors, angiographic findings, and in-hospital mortality between smoking and nonsmoking Turkish men and women with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nazif Aygul; Kurtulus Ozdemir; Adnan Abaci; Meryem Ulku Aygul; Mehmet Akif Duzenli; Huseyin Ugur Yazici; Ibrahim Ozdogru; Ekrem Karakaya
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Angina with "normal" coronary arteries: sex differences in outcomes.

Authors:  Karin H Humphries; Aihua Pu; Min Gao; Ronald G Carere; Louise Pilote
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Depression treatment in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gita Ramamurthy; Edgardo Trejo; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2013-10-24

7.  Prevalence of coronary artery disease assessed by multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gaetano Nucifora; Joanne D Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Sami Kajander; J Wouter Jukema; Joop H M Schreur; Mark W Heijenbrok; Serge A Trines; Oliver Gaemperli; Olli Turta; Philipp A Kaufmann; Juhani Knuuti; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  The incidence of coronary heart disease and the population attributable fraction of its risk factors in Tehran: a 10-year population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Davood Khalili; Farhad Haj Sheikholeslami; Mahmood Bakhtiyari; Fereidoun Azizi; Amir Abbas Momenan; Farzad Hadaegh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of premature coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography in Kurdistan, Iraq.

Authors:  Ameen Mosa Mohammad; Hekmat Izzat Jehangeer; Sabri Khalif Shaikhow
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Prevalence of coronary artery disease and its risk factors in Kerala, South India: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M N Krishnan; G Zachariah; K Venugopal; P P Mohanan; S Harikrishnan; G Sanjay; L Jeyaseelan; K R Thankappan
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.298

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Effectiveness of Peer Group-Based Training on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transradial Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Ahmad Reza Dehghan; Zhila Fereidouni; Majid Najafi Kalyani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparing the association of cardiovascular nursing care with blood pressure and length of stay of in-patients with coronary artery disease in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Fatina B Ramadhani; Yilan Liu; Xue Jing; Ye Qing; Han Xiong; Fengjian Zhang; Pian Wei
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.927

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.