Literature DB >> 30509765

Uptake of PHMB in a bacterial nanocellulose-based wound dressing: A feasible clinical procedure.

Ives Bernardelli de Mattos1, Judith C J Holzer2, Alexandru-Cristian Tuca3, Florian Groeber-Becker1, Martin Funk4, Daniel Popp5, Selma Mautner6, Thomas Birngruber7, Lars-Peter Kamolz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the increase of antimicrobial resistance in recent decades, other methods of preventing and fighting infections must be considered. Burn patients, whose wound areas are often extensive, are especially prone to wound infections. The loading of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) with antiseptics has already been successfully performed but unfortunately, the described procedure is time-consuming and thus not applicable in a clinical emergency setting. Therefore, a clinically feasible approach was established.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sheets of BNC-based wound dressings were placed into antiseptic solutions containing PHMB (Prontosan® and LAVANID® 2) and were left to soak for up to two hours. At different time points, samples were analysed for their concentration of PHMB and antiseptic efficacy.
RESULTS: Within 30min, clinically relevant concentrations of PHMB were achieved in the BNC-based wound dressing. The 30-min PHMB uptake for Prontosan® and LAVANID® 2 resulted in concentrations of 0.05% and 0.019%, respectively. Samples from the PHMB loaded dressing showed a dose dependent antiseptic efficacy for Staphylococcus aureus.
CONCLUSION: This experiment showed that the loading of BNC-based wound dressings with PHMB-containing antiseptics was achieved by a simple and quick procedure. According to studies a PHMB concentration of 0.001% can already inhibits all bacterial growth, indicating that the concentrations of PHMB in the BNC-based wound dressings after 30min are higher than the minimal inhibitory concentration and the antiseptic efficacy after 120min loading analysed by an standardized bacterial disk diffusion assay was shown to be comparable to the clinically used Suprasorb® X+PHMB wound dressing.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial wound dressing; Antiseptic uptake; BNC; Burn treatment; PHMB; Staphylococcus aureus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30509765     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

1.  Orchestrating the Dermal/Epidermal Tissue Ratio during Wound Healing by Controlling the Moisture Content.

Authors:  Alexandru-Cristian Tuca; Ives Bernardelli de Mattos; Martin Funk; Raimund Winter; Alen Palackic; Florian Groeber-Becker; Daniel Kruse; Fabian Kukla; Thomas Lemarchand; Lars-Peter Kamolz
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Comparison of wound healing and patient comfort in partial-thickness burn wounds treated with SUPRATHEL and epictehydro wound dressings.

Authors:  Jennifer Lynn Schiefer; Genoveva Friederike Aretz; Paul Christian Fuchs; Mahsa Bagheri; Martin Funk; Alexandra Schulz; Marc Daniels
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Nanocellulose-based wound dressing for conservative wound management in children with second-degree burns.

Authors:  Annika Resch; Clement Staud; Christine Radtke
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Latest Advances on Bacterial Cellulose-Based Antibacterial Materials as Wound Dressings.

Authors:  Lu Zheng; Shanshan Li; Jiwen Luo; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 5.  Wound dressings: curbing inflammation in chronic wound healing.

Authors:  Davide Vincenzo Verdolino; Helen A Thomason; Andrea Fotticchia; Sarah Cartmell
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-10-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.