| Literature DB >> 30509217 |
Therese Werner-Bierwisch1,2,3, Christiane Pinkert4,5, Karin Niessen4,5, Sabine Metzing6,4, Claudia Hellmers4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: From the individual perspective, security, which is essential to life quality, is characterised as an elementary human need that requires fulfilment. During the transition to parenthood, mothers and fathers are confronted with changes in physical and psychosocial processes that are accompanied by uncertainty and insecurity. Feelings of insecurity may have consequences affecting their pregnancy and childbirth experiences as well as their adaption to the parental role in the first weeks following childbirth. In this context, it is important to understand how parents express and interpret their sense of security to effectively support their security needs. This integrative review aimed to provide a critical synthesis of existing research on parents' experiences of their sense of security associated with pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period.Entities:
Keywords: Childbirth; Fathers; Literature review; Mothers; Postnatal period; Pregnancy; Sense of security
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30509217 PMCID: PMC6278054 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2096-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Fig. 1PRISMA flow diagram of the search strategy outcomes
Appraisal of studies by study design using CASP tools
| Qualitative studies (Qualitative Checklist) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author(s) | Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? | Was a qualitative methodology appropriate? | Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? | Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to address the aims of the research? | Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | Was the relationship between the researcher and participants adequately considered? | Were ethical issues taken into consideration? | Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | Was there a clear statement of findings? | Is the research valuable? | |
| Côté-Arsenault and Donato [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y | |
| Ekström et al. [ | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Halldorsdottir and Karlsdottir [ | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Karlström et al. [ | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Melender and Lauri [ | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Namey and Lyerly [ | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Persson and Dykes [ | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Persson et al. [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Persson et al. [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | |
| Quantitative studies (Cohort Study Checklist) | |||||||||||
| Did the study address a clearly focused issue? | Was the cohort recruited in an acceptable way? | Was the exposure accurately measured to minimise bias? | Was the outcome accurately measured to minimise bias? | Did the authors identify all important confounding factors? Did they consider the factors in the design and/or analysis? | Was the follow-up of subjects sufficiently complete/long enough? | Were the results presented transparently and precisely? | Are the results plausible? | Can the results be applied to the local population? | Do the results of this study fit with other available evidence? | Does the study have implications for practice? | |
| Melender and Lauri [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Persson and Dykes [ | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Y yes, N no, NA not answered
Synoptic view of papers included in the review
| Qualitative studies | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors and country | Objective | Study sample and inclusion criteria | Research design and data collection method(s), instrument(s) | Method(s) of analysis | Key findings | Limitations |
| Côté-Arsenault and Donato [ | To describe women’s late pregnancy after loss experiences | Purposive sampling; | Qualitative, longitudinal study | Thematic analysis | Previous experiences influenced the sense of security in the subsequent pregnancy. Assessing foetal movements and regular feedback from a care provider contributed to a sense of security. | Relatively unstructured and extensive data collection |
| Ekström et al. [ | To explore fathers’ feelings and experiences during pregnancy and childbirth | Purposive sampling; | Qualitative, inductive approach | Content analysis | Being prepared to welcome the baby gave first-time fathers a sense of security. The confidence in healthcare professionals contributed to paternal sense of security. The lack of control over the beginning of the childbirth created insecurity. | Recruitment by midwives at two maternity wards |
| Halldorsdottir and Karlsdottir [ | To explore the essential structure of the experience of childbearing from the perspective of women | Purposive sampling; | Qualitative, phenomenological approach | Thematic analysis | Feeling safe was perceived as a need while in labour and delivery. Fulfilment through the support and presence of a midwife and the partner reduced fear and encouraged admittance to the birth. | Small sample |
| Karlström et al. [ | To describe women’s experiences of a very positive birth experience | Purposive sampling; | Qualitative (part of a prospective longitudinal cohort study) | Thematic analysis | Feeling safe was an essential part of positive birth experiences and was confirmed by the presence of the child’s father, a trustful relationship with the midwife, and a positive atmosphere in the birthing suite. Feeling safe was essential to gaining control during birth. | The timing of recruitment: 6–7 years after the index birth |
| Melender and Lauri [ | To describe security associated with pregnancy and childbirth | Convenience sampling; | Qualitative | Content analysis | The elements creating security associated with pregnancy and childbirth were maternity healthcare, social support, a sense of control and one’s own attitudes. If the feeling of security was lessened during pregnancy, a search for support was performed through the women’s social network and contact with the midwife or obstetrician. | The sampling strategy is insufficiently described |
| Namey and Lyerly [ | To deconstruct the term “control” as used by childbearing women | Purposive sampling; 101 mothers | Qualitative | Data analysed using NVivo software. Method of key word concept analysis by Quinn | Part of the definition of control relates to personal security, which encompasses feelings of physical safety and emotional and psychological attributes of security, such as comfort and confidence in one’s surroundings. Management of the birth experience and minimisation of anxiety or fear are associated with feelings of personal security. | Sample: Only parous women |
| Persson and Dykes [ | To reveal factors that influence the experiences of mothers and fathers when they choose to return home | Purposive sampling; | Qualitative. Grounded theory | Coding by Strauss and Corbin | The most important factors for creating a sense of security for the parents were the midwife’s empowering behaviour, affinity within the family, autonomy and sense of control and physical well-being. | Purposive recruitment from one hospital by using theoretical sampling strategy |
| Persson et al. [ | To describe factors influencing mothers’ sense of security during the first postnatal week | Purposive sampling; n = 14 mothers | Qualitative descriptive design | Thematic content analysis by Burnard | Mother’s postnatal sense of security was dependent on support from staff, support from the partner, and the mother’s and baby’s physical health and well-being. | Variation in time span for conducting the interviews |
| Persson et al. [ | To explore and describe factors that influence fathers’ sense of security during the first postnatal week | Purposive sampling; | Qualitative | Thematic content analysis by Burnard | Participation in the processes of pregnancy, birth and early parenthood fostered fathers’ postnatal sense of security. Fathers felt secure when they had someone knowledgeable to ask and when they were heard and taken seriously. | Variation in time span for conducting the interviews |
| Quantitative studies | ||||||
| Authors and country | Objective | Study sample and inclusion criteria | Research design and data collection method(s), instrument(s) | Method(s) of analysis | Key findings | Limitations |
| Melender and Lauri [ | To describe elements creating a sense of security associated with pregnancy and childbirth, the manifestation and the influence of background factors | Quantitative, descriptive design | Factor analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U-test |
| Limitations were not stated | |
| Persson and Dykes [ | To evaluate dimensions of both parents’ postnatal sense of security during the first week after childbirth | Evaluative, cross-sectional design | Mann-Whitney U-test and multiple regression analysis | First-time mothers felt significantly less postnatal security than experienced mothers. | There was no analysis of the dropouts due to the study design | |
REP relative explanatory power
Factors influencing mothers’ sense of security
| Internal factors | Emotional state, knowledge and experiences |
| ─ Sense of control [ | |
| ─ Autonomy [ | |
| ─ Comfort [ | |
| ─ Feeling of not being alone [ | |
| ─ Confidence in ability to give birth [ | |
| ─ Confidence in one’s surroundings [ | |
| ─ Positive attitudes to pregnancy and childbirth [ | |
| ─ Knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and baby care [ | |
| ─ Positive stories about pregnancy, childbirth and baby care [ | |
| ─ Previous childbirth experiences [ | |
| Physical health of mother and child | |
| ─ Foetal movements and growth [ | |
| ─ Physical well-being of mother and child [ | |
| ─ Pregnancy-related complications [ | |
| ─ Active self-care and care of unborn child [ | |
| External factors | Attributes and acts of supporting persons |
| ─ Presence of a caring midwife [ | |
| ─ Support of a caring midwife when needed [ | |
| ─ Trustful relationship with a caring midwife [ | |
| ─ Support/regular feedback from healthcare professionals [ | |
| ─ Being seen as an individual [ | |
| ─ Consistent advice/information [ | |
| ─ Partner’s and own participation in care [ | |
| ─ Presence and support of the partner [ | |
| ─ Support from relatives [ | |
| Settings and options of maternity care | |
| ─ Prenatal visits and ultrasound [ | |
| ─ Medical expertise/maternity healthcare [ | |
| ─ Positive atmosphere in the birthing suite [ | |
| ─ Avoiding interventions [ | |
| ─ Planned follow-up after birth [ | |
| Personal life situation | |
| ─ Livelihood [ |
Factors influencing fathers’ sense of security
| Internal factors | Own emotional state, knowledge and experiences |
| ─ Being prepared to welcome the baby [ | |
| ─ Lack of control over the beginning of birth [ | |
| ─ Concern about not arriving at the delivery ward in time and having to deliver the baby themselves [ | |
| ─ Confidence in healthcare professionals [ | |
| ─ Sense of participation during pregnancy [ | |
| ─ Sense of participation in decision making during birth [ | |
| ─ Sense of being responsible for the care of the mother and the child at home [ | |
| ─ Knowing who to ask [ | |
| ─ Previous experiences of childbirth [ | |
| ─ Affinity to mother of the common child [ | |
| External factors | States of health of mother and child |
| ─ Emotional well-being of the mother [ | |
| ─ Physical well-being of the baby/ability to breast feed [ | |
| ─ Birth without complications [ | |
| ─ Woman’s experiences and knowledge [ | |
| Attributes and acts of supporting persons | |
| ─ Competence of healthcare professionals/midwives [ | |
| ─ Midwives’/nurses’ empowering behaviour [ | |
| ─ Cooperation with the midwife [ | |
| ─ Participation in the care of the baby [ | |
| ─ Information from friends and midwives [ | |
| ─ Being taken care of and attention during childbirth [ | |
| ─ Being heard and taken seriously [ | |
| ─ Being given confirmation about the normality of the situation [ | |
| ─ Being given relevant and consistent information and explanations [ | |
| Settings and options of maternity care | |
| ─ Participation in antenatal visits [ | |
| ─ Parental education meetings [ | |
| ─ The opportunity to be together with the mother and child at hospital [ | |
| ─ Postnatal visits at home [ | |
| ─ Available medical resources after childbirth [ | |
| Personal live situation | |
| ─ Returning home after childbirth [ | |
| ─ Possibility of being together with the mother and child at home [ |