Cara L Sedney1, Uzer Khan2, Patricia Dekeseredy3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 3. WVU Medicine, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Abstract
Context: Medicaid has been linked to worse outcomes in a variety of diagnoses such as lung cancer, uterine cancer, and cardiac valve procedures. It has furthermore been linked to the reduced health-related quality of life outcomes after traumatic injuries when compared to other insurance groups. In spinal cord injury (SCI), the care provided in the subacute setting may vary based upon payor status, which may have implications on outcomes and cost of care.Design: A retrospective review utilizing the institutional trauma databank was performed for all adult patients with spinal cord injury since 2009. Pediatric patients were excluded. Insurance type, race, length of stay, discharge status (alive/dead), discharge disposition, injury severity score (ISS), and hospital charges billed were recorded. Results: Two hundred patients were identified. Overall 27.5% of patients with SCI during the period of our review were Medicaid beneficiaries. ISS was similar between Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients, but the Medicaid beneficiaries were younger (37 vs 50 years of age; P < .001). Medicaid beneficiaries had a significantly longer length of stay (20.9 days; P < .001) when compared to all other patients. They furthermore were more likely to be discharged home or to a skilled nursing facility rather than an acute rehabilitation center. Inpatient charges billed for Medicaid beneficiaries were significantly higher than those of non-Medicaid patients (203,264 USD vs 140,114 USD; P = .015), likely reflecting the increased length of stay while awaiting appropriate disposition. Conclusion: Medicaid patients with SCI in West Virginia had a longer hospital stay, higher charges billed, and were more likely to be discharged home or to a skilled nursing facility rather than an acute rehabilitation center, when compared to non-Medicaid patients. The lack of availability of rehabilitation facilities for Medicaid beneficiaries likely explains this difference.
Context: Medicaid has been linked to worse outcomes in a variety of diagnoses such as lung cancer, uterine cancer, and cardiac valve procedures. It has furthermore been linked to the reduced health-related quality of life outcomes after traumatic injuries when compared to other insurance groups. In spinal cord injury (SCI), the care provided in the subacute setting may vary based upon payor status, which may have implications on outcomes and cost of care.Design: A retrospective review utilizing the institutional trauma databank was performed for all adult patients with spinal cord injury since 2009. Pediatric patients were excluded. Insurance type, race, length of stay, discharge status (alive/dead), discharge disposition, injury severity score (ISS), and hospital charges billed were recorded. Results: Two hundred patients were identified. Overall 27.5% of patients with SCI during the period of our review were Medicaid beneficiaries. ISS was similar between Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients, but the Medicaid beneficiaries were younger (37 vs 50 years of age; P < .001). Medicaid beneficiaries had a significantly longer length of stay (20.9 days; P < .001) when compared to all other patients. They furthermore were more likely to be discharged home or to a skilled nursing facility rather than an acute rehabilitation center. Inpatient charges billed for Medicaid beneficiaries were significantly higher than those of non-Medicaid patients (203,264 USD vs 140,114 USD; P = .015), likely reflecting the increased length of stay while awaiting appropriate disposition. Conclusion: Medicaid patients with SCI in West Virginia had a longer hospital stay, higher charges billed, and were more likely to be discharged home or to a skilled nursing facility rather than an acute rehabilitation center, when compared to non-Medicaid patients. The lack of availability of rehabilitation facilities for Medicaid beneficiaries likely explains this difference.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health outcomes; Insurance disparities; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury; West Virginia
Authors: Ronald E Cossman; Jeralynn S Cossman; Sarah Rogers; David McBride; Xiaojin Song; La'Mont Sutton; Megan Stubbs Journal: South Med J Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Adil H Haider; Paul Logan Weygandt; Jessica M Bentley; Maria Francesca Monn; Karim Abdur Rehman; Benjamin L Zarzaur; Marie L Crandall; Edward E Cornwell; Lisa A Cooper Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Rittal Mehta; Kota Sahara; Katiuscha Merath; J Madison Hyer; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Anghela Z Paredes; Aslam Ejaz; Jordan M Cloyd; Mary Dillhoff; Allan Tsung; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.452