Literature DB >> 30508316

One Year of Romosozumab Followed by Two Years of Denosumab Maintains Fracture Risk Reductions: Results of the FRAME Extension Study.

E Michael Lewiecki1, Rajani V Dinavahi2, Marise Lazaretti-Castro3, Peter R Ebeling4, Jonathan D Adachi5, Akimitsu Miyauchi6, Evelien Gielen7, Cassandra E Milmont2, Cesar Libanati8, Andreas Grauer2.   

Abstract

Romosozumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits sclerostin, has the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. As previously reported in the pivotal FRActure study in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME), women with a T-score of ≤ -2.5 at the total hip or femoral neck received subcutaneous placebo or romosozumab once monthly for 12 months, followed by open-label subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months for an additional 12 months. Upon completion of the 24-month primary analysis period, eligible women entered the extension phase and received denosumab for an additional 12 months. Here, we report the final analysis results through 36 months, including efficacy assessments of new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fracture; bone mineral density (BMD); and safety assessments. Of 7180 women enrolled, 5743 (80%) completed the 36-month study (2851 romosozumab-to-denosumab; 2892 placebo-to-denosumab). Through 36 months, fracture risk was reduced in subjects receiving romosozumab versus placebo for 12 months followed by 24 months of denosumab for both groups: new vertebral fracture (relative risk reduction [RRR], 66%; incidence, 1.0% versus 2.8%; p < 0.001), clinical fracture (RRR, 27%; incidence, 4.0% versus 5.5%; p = 0.004), and nonvertebral fracture (RRR, 21%; incidence, 3.9% versus 4.9%; p = 0.039). BMD continued to increase for the 2 years with denosumab treatment in both arms. The substantial difference in BMD achieved through 12 months of romosozumab treatment versus placebo was maintained through the follow-up period when both treatment arms received denosumab. Subject incidence of adverse events, including positively adjudicated serious cardiovascular adverse events, were overall balanced between groups. In conclusion, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 12 months of romosozumab led to persistent fracture reduction benefit and ongoing BMD gains when followed by 24 months of denosumab. The sequence of romosozumab followed by denosumab may be a promising regimen for the treatment of osteoporosis.
© 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE MINERAL DENSITY; DENOSUMAB; FRACTURE RISK; POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS; ROMOSOZUMAB

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30508316     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  28 in total

Review 1.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 2.  Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Eben G Estell; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  New therapeutic options for bone diseases.

Authors:  Roland Kocijan; Judith Haschka; Julia Feurstein; Jochen Zwerina
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 4.  Effect of drugs on bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Giorgia Colarossi; Jörg Eschweiler; Markus Tingart; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  Sclerostin: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Sakae Tanaka; Toshio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Osteoporosis: Current and Emerging Therapies Targeted to Immunological Checkpoints.

Authors:  Massimo De Martinis; Maria Maddalena Sirufo; Lia Ginaldi
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Molecular Basis for Craniofacial Phenotypes Caused by Sclerostin Deletion.

Authors:  J Chen; X Yuan; I Pilawski; X Liu; J Delgado-Calle; T Bellido; H Turkkahraman; J A Helms
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Pro-osteogenic Effects of WNT in a Mouse Model of Bone Formation Around Femoral Implants.

Authors:  Zhijun Li; Xue Yuan; Masaki Arioka; Daniel Bahat; Qiang Sun; Jinlong Chen; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Anabolic treatments for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Neelam Hassan; Celia L Gregson; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 10.  The Effects of Receptor Activator of NF-κB Ligand-Binding Peptides on Bone Resorption and Bone Formation.

Authors:  Fatma Rashed; Shingo Kamijyo; Yuri Shimizu; Yuna Hirohashi; Masud Khan; Yasutaka Sugamori; Ramachandran Murali; Kazuhiro Aoki
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.