Literature DB >> 30508126

OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY: A PHANTOM-BASED STUDY.

Vasileios I Metaxas1, Gerasimos A Messaris1, George D Gatzounis2, George S Panayiotakis1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to provide useful data, which may help neurosurgeons to manage the patient dose and image quality in spinal surgery procedures, utilising a phantom and a test object. The kerma area product, cumulative dose (CD) and entrance surface dose (ESD) rate on the phantom and image intensifier were measured, for selectable fields of view (FOVs), fluoroscopy modes, two geometric magnifications and various phantom thicknesses. The images were subjectively evaluated regarding low-contrast detectability and high-contrast resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), high-contrast spatial resolution (HCSR) and figure of merit (FOM) values were also estimated. The ESD rates increased with increasing phantom thickness, when using electronic or geometric magnification, continuous or high-definition fluoroscopy (HDF). The observers' evaluation showed relatively slight changes in image quality when pulsed fluoroscopy was used. SNR, CNR and HCSR values decreased with increasing phantom thicknesses, while remained almost constant when using pulsed fluoroscopy. SNR and HCSR improved in HDF, while the CNR remained almost constant only for the FOVs 23 and 17 cm. By applying electronic magnification, this resulted in improved HCSR. FOM values decreased in HDF, with increasing phantom thickness and using electronic magnification. For the 'thinnest' patients, CD may overestimate skin dose by 25% than the actual values. Geometric magnification resulted in improved FOM, especially for low-dose fluoroscopy and FOV 23 cm. The knowledge of the increments in dose values, image quality and FOM indices concerning phantom thickness may help neurosurgeons to optimise spinal surgery procedures by selecting the appropriate operational parameters, which could contribute toward the establishment of a radiation protection culture.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30508126     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncy205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  1 in total

1.  Image Quality and Dose Comparison of 3 Mobile Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Norah Foster; Christopher Shaffrey; Avery Buchholz; Raymond Turner; Lexie Zidanyue Yang; Donna Niedzwiecki; Allen Goode
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.210

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.