Literature DB >> 30506605

Doppler ultrasound diagnosis of transient leg malperfusion caused by dynamic obstruction in a patient with chronic aortic dissection.

Tsuyoshi Yoshimuta1,2, Akira Tsuneto1, Toshiya Okajima3, Hiroshi Tanaka4, Takako Minami1, Masakazu Yamagishi5, Satoshi Ikeda1, Hiroaki Kawano1, Koji Maemura1.   

Abstract

Leg malperfusion caused by dynamic obstruction is a serious complication of aortic dissection. A diagnosis of the malperfusion is difficult because it is made mainly on the basis of nonspecific symptoms such as intermittent claudication and numbness on walking. In the present study, we reported on a case of a 51-year-old man with leg malperfusion in chronic aortic dissection diagnosed by Doppler ultrasound. The combination of bisferious and dampened velocity waveform changes after walking may lead us to suspect a leg malperfusion caused by dynamic obstruction.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler ultrasound; dynamic obstruction; leg malperfusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30506605      PMCID: PMC6587712          DOI: 10.1111/echo.14198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


CASE REPORT

A 51‐year‐old man was admitted to our hospital with a sudden onset of severe chest pain. Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed acute type B aortic dissection with a thrombosed false lumen in the ascending aorta and partially thrombosed false lumen in the descending aorta. In addition, there was an intimal flap extending from the ascending aorta to the right common iliac artery. Because there was no evidence of obstruction or severe compression of the true lumen by the false lumen, he was treated with medication. Several months later, he complained of worsening left lower limb fatigue on walking. The ankle‐brachial pressure index was >0.9 in both legs at rest. Contrast‐enhanced CT again demonstrated no evidence of obstruction or severe narrowing of the true lumen (Figure 1). Therefore, he underwent a walking test (an incline of 5% and a speed of 2.4 km/h) to differentiate vascular claudication from neurogenic claudication.1 The test was stopped after 4 minutes and 17 seconds (a distance of 171.1 m) at a maximal blood pressure of 140/82 mm Hg because he complained of cramp in his left calf. Under these conditions, Doppler ultrasound (US) of the left common femoral artery, which was supplied via true lumen, showed a bisferious velocity waveform with dampened early and late systolic components and absent diastolic components (Figure 2A, red and yellow arrows). Ten minutes later, repeat Doppler US of the left common femoral artery showed a normal waveform after complete resolution of his symptoms with a blood pressure of 108/54 mm Hg (Figure 2B). Subsequently, he underwent open surgical aneurysm repair with a Y‐graft and his symptoms on walking resolved.
Figure 1

Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography shows aortic dissection with a partially thrombosed false lumen in the descending aorta and an intimal flap extending from the descending thoracic aorta to the right common iliac artery. Center: Image obtained by 3‐dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography data. Left and Right: Early phase axial images. Note that there is no evidence of obstruction or severe compression of the true lumen by the false lumen. AA, Ascending aorta; DA, Descending aorta; FL, False lumen; IF, Intimal flap; L, Left; R, Right; TL, True lumen

Figure 2

Doppler US shows exercise‐induced changes of the Doppler velocity waveform in the left common femoral artery (CFA). A, Doppler US shows bisferious velocity waveforms with dampened early and late systolic components (red and yellow arrows) and absent diastolic component immediately after walking. B, Ten minutes later, Doppler US shows normal Doppler velocity waveforms after complete resolution of his symptoms. L‐CFA, Left common femoral artery, L‐CFV, Left common femoral vein

Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography shows aortic dissection with a partially thrombosed false lumen in the descending aorta and an intimal flap extending from the descending thoracic aorta to the right common iliac artery. Center: Image obtained by 3‐dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography data. Left and Right: Early phase axial images. Note that there is no evidence of obstruction or severe compression of the true lumen by the false lumen. AA, Ascending aorta; DA, Descending aorta; FL, False lumen; IF, Intimal flap; L, Left; R, Right; TL, True lumen Doppler US shows exercise‐induced changes of the Doppler velocity waveform in the left common femoral artery (CFA). A, Doppler US shows bisferious velocity waveforms with dampened early and late systolic components (red and yellow arrows) and absent diastolic component immediately after walking. B, Ten minutes later, Doppler US shows normal Doppler velocity waveforms after complete resolution of his symptoms. L‐CFA, Left common femoral artery, L‐CFV, Left common femoral vein

DISCUSSION

Organ malperfusion resulting from aortic dissection is a serious complication with a poor outcome if it is not appropriately diagnosed.2, 3 The malperfusion has two main causative factors, which are classified as static and dynamic obstruction.4 Malperfusion caused by static obstruction occurs when the dissection flap occludes or enters the origin of a branch vessel. In patients with static obstruction, CT often demonstrates a true lumen is severely compressed by false lumen in either the thoracic or abdominal aorta.4, 5 On the other hand, a clinical diagnosis of malperfusion by dynamic obstruction can only be made on the basis of nonspecific symptoms such as intermittent claudication and numbness on walking, because CT shows that the true lumen has an adequate diameter. Malperfusion cause by dynamic obstruction is thought to occur when the dissection flap within the aortic lumen moves toward the true lumen in response to changes in blood pressure, leading to organ ischemia and dysfunction.4, 6 However, the relationship between malperfusion cause by dynamic obstruction and blood pressure is complicated. According to experimental study in a dissection model, the true lumen collapse is induced by an increase in the size of an entry tear, a decrease in the false‐lumen outflow caused by occluding the false‐lumen branch vessels, or an increase in the true‐lumen outflow created by lowering the peripheral resistance in true‐lumen branch vessels.6 As shown in Figure 2A, an interesting aspect of our case was a finding that systolic velocity waveform had two components with the diminished early and late systolic velocity waveform after walking. The finding may be caused by a mechanism that true lumen was severely compressed by the false lumen, when blood pressure of false lumen was much higher than that of true lumen after walking. To our knowledge, there has been no previous report of bisferious and dampened velocity waveform changes in patients with leg malperfusion due to dynamic obstruction after walking, while there have been some reports of organ malperfusion due to static obstruction.7, 8, 9 Performing Doppler US after walking can clearly demonstrate the pathophysiologic mechanism of leg malperfusion due to dynamic obstruction in patients with chronic aortic dissection by showing changes of the Doppler velocity waveform, although further prospective investigation should be performed to confirm the sensitivity and specificity.
  9 in total

1.  True-lumen collapse in aortic dissection: part I. Evaluation of causative factors in phantoms with pulsatile flow.

Authors:  J W Chung; C Elkins; T Sakai; N Kato; T Vestring; C P Semba; S M Slonim; M D Dake
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries: the Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Michal Tendera; Victor Aboyans; Marie-Louise Bartelink; Iris Baumgartner; Denis Clément; Jean-Philippe Collet; Alberto Cremonesi; Marco De Carlo; Raimund Erbel; F Gerry R Fowkes; Magda Heras; Serge Kownator; Erich Minar; Jan Ostergren; Don Poldermans; Vincent Riambau; Marco Roffi; Joachim Röther; Horst Sievert; Marc van Sambeek; Thomas Zeller
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  The dissected aorta: part III. Anatomy and radiologic diagnosis of branch-vessel compromise.

Authors:  D M Williams; D Y Lee; B H Hamilton; M V Marx; D L Narasimham; S N Kazanjian; M R Prince; J C Andrews; K J Cho; G M Deeb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Doppler ultrasonic diagnosis of dissecting aneurysms of the aortic and great vessels.

Authors:  A R Todini; P L Antignani
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Doppler ultrasound in aortic dissections: a study of cephalic and peripheral arteries.

Authors:  F Dany; J Bensaid; J Hamel; A Chabanier; B Delhoume; C Christides
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 6.  Management of acute type B aortic dissections and acute limb ischemia.

Authors:  A Khoynezhad; R Rao; A Trento; B Gewertz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.888

Review 7.  Update in acute aortic syndrome: intramural hematoma and incomplete dissection as new disease entities.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Determinants of in-hospital death and rupture in patients with a Stanford B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Kenichi Sakakura; Norifumi Kubo; Junya Ako; Nahoko Ikeda; Hiroshi Funayama; Taishi Hirahara; Yoshitaka Sugawara; Takanori Yasu; Masanobu Kawakami; Shinichi Momomura
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Transcranial Doppler sonography: abnormal waveform pattern of intracranial arteries in acute aortic arch dissection.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vadikolias; John Heliopoulos; Ioannis Bougioukas; Panos Prassopoulos; Charitomeni Piperidou
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.486

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A useful exercise test for detecting leg malperfusion due to aortic dissection.

Authors:  Baku Takahashi; Keiji Kamohara
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2022-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.