Literature DB >> 30506565

Catecholamine Vasopressor Support Sparing Strategies in Vasodilatory Shock.

Mitchell S Buckley1, Jeffrey F Barletta2, Pamela L Smithburger3, John J Radosevich4, Sandra L Kane-Gill3.   

Abstract

Shock syndromes are associated with unacceptably high rates of mortality in critically ill patients despite advances in therapeutic options. Vasodilatory shock is the most common type encountered in the intensive care unit. It is manifested by cardiovascular failure, peripheral vasodilatation, and arterial hypotension leading to tissue hypoperfusion and organ failure. Hemodynamic support is typically initiated with fluid resuscitation strategies and administration of adrenergic vasopressor agents in nonresponsive patients to restore arterial pressure with subsequent adequate organ reperfusion. Unfortunately, high catecholamine dosing requirements may be necessary to achieve targeted hemodynamic goals that may increase the risk of vasopressor-induced adverse events. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical efficacy and safety data and potential role in therapy for catecholamine-sparing agents in vasodilatory shock. Adjunctive therapeutic options to reduce vasoactive support requirements without compromising arterial pressure include arginine vasopressin and analogs, corticosteroids, midodrine, methylene blue, and angiotensin II. Although concomitant vasopressin and corticosteroids have a more defined role in evidence-based guidelines for managing shock, clinicians may consider other potential catecholamine-sparing agents.
© 2018 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiotensin II; corticosteroids; methylene blue; midodrine; sepsis; septic shock; vasopressin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30506565     DOI: 10.1002/phar.2199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  5 in total

1.  "Vasopressor Support Sparing Strategies": a Concept to be Incorporated as a Paradigm in the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto B Evora; Domingo M Braile
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb

2.  A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study of Angiotensin II in Shock.

Authors:  Susan E Smith; Andrea S Newsome; Yanglin Guo; Jason Hecht; Michael T McCurdy; Michael A Mazzeffi; Jonathan H Chow; Shravan Kethireddy
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.510

Review 3.  Vasopressor-Sparing Action of Methylene Blue in Severe Sepsis and Shock: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Filomena Puntillo; Mariateresa Giglio; Alberto Pasqualucci; Nicola Brienza; Antonella Paladini; Giustino Varrassi
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  CRRT influences PICCO measurements in febrile critically ill patients.

Authors:  Qiancheng Xu; Yuhan Cao; Weihua Lu; Jianguo Li
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  Effect of midodrine versus placebo on time to vasopressor discontinuation in patients with persistent hypotension in the intensive care unit (MIDAS): an international randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Peter Santer; Matthew H Anstey; Maria D Patrocínio; Bradley Wibrow; Bijan Teja; Denys Shay; Shahzad Shaefi; Charles S Parsons; Timothy T Houle; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 17.440

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.