Literature DB >> 30506392

The impact of age and egg-laying cycle on female grasshoppers' preference functions for acoustic signals.

Jennifer Aufderheide1, Bernhard Ronacher2.   

Abstract

Female responsiveness and the shape of preference functions for male signal traits are important determinants for male mating success. We observed the responsiveness and the selectivity of virgin grasshopper females (Chorthippus biguttulus L.) for different features of males' acoustic signals throughout their life span to detect possible influences of age on the females' preference functions. In particular, we explored the hypothesis that the females may become less selective with increasing age and, therefore, would start to accept songs that are normally rejected. Such an age effect could relieve the selection pressure on male signal traits. In the majority of animals tested, the general responsiveness decreased with age although a few individuals exhibited an opposite trend. Contrary to the above expectation, there was no indication of a loss of selectivity in older females or an increased acceptance of normally unattractive song models. The timing within the oviposition cycle had a strong effect on responsiveness: near oviposition the general responsiveness increased and with it also the half width of the preference functions. However, highly unattractive song models remained unattractive also near oviposition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic communication; Age effects; Female choice; Oviposition; Preference functions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30506392     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-018-1307-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  17 in total

1.  Influence of amplitude modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus.

Authors:  B Ronacher; C Hoffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Grasshopper calling songs convey information about condition and health of males.

Authors:  Nicole Stange; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The role of frequency, phase and time for processing of amplitude modulated signals by grasshoppers.

Authors:  A Schmidt; B Ronacher; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Coevolution of male mating signal and female preference during early lineage divergence of the Hawaiian cricket, Laupala cerasina.

Authors:  Jaime L Grace; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Noise affects the shape of female preference functions for acoustic signals.

Authors:  Michael S Reichert; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Exploring the hidden landscape of female preferences for complex signals.

Authors:  Michael S Reichert; Jonas Finck; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Matthew R Wilkins; Nathalie Seddon; Rebecca J Safran
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Reproductive behaviour of female Chorthippus biguttulus grasshoppers.

Authors:  Andrea Wirmer; Melanie Faustmann; Ralf Heinrich
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.354

9.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE FIELD CRICKET, GRYLLUS INTEGER.

Authors:  David A Gray; William H Cade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Attractiveness of the male Acheta domesticus calling song to females. III. The relation of age-correlated changes in syllable period recognition and phonotactic threshold to juvenile hormone III biosynthesis.

Authors:  R Walikonis; D Schoun; D Zacharias; J Henley; P Coburn; J Stout
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.