Literature DB >> 30506096

Differences of body height, axial length, and refractive error at different ages in Kumejima study.

Takehiro Yamashita1, Aiko Iwase2, Hiroshi Sakai3, Hiroto Terasaki1, Taiji Sakamoto4, Makoto Araie5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationships between the axial length (AL), refractive error (RE), and body height (BH) at different ages of a genetically-stable population in Kumejima, Japan.
METHODS: Cross-sectional, population-based study. Residents of Kumejima who were ≥ 40-years old were studied. The eligible residents had a thorough ocular examinations including measurements of the AL, RE, and BH. The subjects were divided into decade groups. The relationships between the AL, the RE, and the BH of the different decades were determined.
RESULTS: Reliable measurements of the AL of the right eyes were obtained from 2198 (1103 men and 1095 women) normal subjects. There was a significant and negative correlation between the age and the BH (r = -0.44, P < 0.001) and the AL (r = -0.27, P < 0.001). There were significant and positive correlations between the BH and AL in all subjects (r = 0.38, P < 0.001). There was a significant and positive correlation between the BH and the AL in all age brackets (r = 0.26~0.49, P < 0.001). There was a significant and positive correlation between the age and RE (spherical equivalent; r = 0.49, P < 0.001). There were significant and negative correlations between the BH and RE in all subjects (r = -0.29, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The younger individuals tend to be taller, have longer AL, and are more myopic. Considering the marked improvement of the nutritional status during the growth period of each generation and its close association with BH, nutrition may be one of factors that is related to the increase in the prevalence of myopia in the younger generation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial length; Body height; Body weight; Kumejima study; Myopia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30506096     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-4192-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  44 in total

1.  Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore.

Authors:  T Y Wong; P J Foster; J Hee; T P Ng; J M Tielsch; S J Chew; G J Johnson; S K Seah
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar Survey.

Authors:  T Y Wong; P J Foster; G J Johnson; B E Klein; S K Seah
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Refractive errors in an urban population in Southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  R Dandona; L Dandona; T J Naduvilath; M Srinivas; C A McCarty; G N Rao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Wei-Han Chua; Ching-Ye Hong; Hui-Min Wu; Kee-Seng Chia; Richard A Stone; Donald Tan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  K Attebo; R Q Ivers; P Mitchell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Myopia: attempts to arrest progression.

Authors:  S M Saw; G Gazzard; K-G Au Eong; D T H Tan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  M Wensor; C A McCarty; H R Taylor
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05

8.  Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rupert R A Bourne; Brendan P Dineen; Syed M Ali; Deen M Noorul Huq; Gordon J Johnson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Prevalence rates of refractive errors in Sumatra, Indonesia.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Gus Gazzard; David Koh; Mohamed Farook; Daniel Widjaja; Jeanette Lee; Donald T H Tan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Ocular biometry and refraction in Mongolian adults.

Authors:  Sanjeewa Wickremasinghe; Paul J Foster; Davaatseren Uranchimeg; Pak Sang Lee; Joe G Devereux; Poul Helge Alsbirk; David Machin; Gordon J Johnson; Jamyanjav Baasanhu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of ocular biometry in the Japanese population using a multicenter approach: Prospective observational study.

Authors:  Takushi Kawamorita; Hiroshi Uozato; Tetsuro Oshika; Kazuno Negishi; Takashi Fujikado; Akira Murakami; Kazutaka Kamiya; Naoyuki Maeda; Yuta Ueno; Kazuhiro Onuma; Masakazu Hirota; Rie Hoshikawa; Sachiko Masui; Masahiro Yamaguchi; Toshifumi Mihashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Macular Layer Thickness and Effect of BMI, Body Fat, and Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Therese von Hanno; Live Lund Hareide; Lars Småbrekke; Bente Morseth; Monica Sneve; Maja Gran Erke; Ellisiv Bøgeberg Mathiesen; Geir Bertelsen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.925

3.  Axial Growth Driven by Physical Development and Myopia among Children: A Two Year Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shida Chen; Yangfeng Guo; Xiaotong Han; Xinping Yu; Qianyun Chen; Decai Wang; Xiang Chen; Ling Jin; Jason Ha; Yuting Li; Yabin Qu; Rong Lin; Mingguang He; Yangfa Zeng; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Factors in Color Fundus Photographs That Can Be Used by Humans to Determine Sex of Individuals.

Authors:  Takehiro Yamashita; Ryo Asaoka; Hiroto Terasaki; Hiroshi Murata; Minoru Tanaka; Kumiko Nakao; Taiji Sakamoto
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.