| Literature DB >> 30505917 |
J Adewale Folayan1, F N Osuolale2, P A L Anawe1.
Abstract
Today׳s engineering systems and machine are so sophisticated that mere energy analysis cannot accurately and reliably describe the thermodynamic behaviour, viz-a-viz the energy changes occurring in these complex systems. Hence, a more efficient and realistic parameter that provides us with useful information about thermodynamic losses and energy efficiency improvement potential is the exergy analyses. Fresh samples of onion fruits were washed with distilled water to remove particles and contaminants that can adversely affect the experimental results. Hence, 36.50 g of the sample at different thicknesses of 0.50 cm, 1.00 cm and 1.50 cm were taken into the cabinet dryer for drying at different temperatures of 65 °C, 75 °C,85 °C and 95 °C and the weight loss at each temperature and thickness was determined with the aid of a digital weighing balance. Hence, it was on this premise that the exergy analyses in terms of exergy loss, exergetic improvement potential and exergetic sustainability index of drying process of onion at different drying air temperatures, drying periods and thicknesses in a cabinet dryer was performed.Entities:
Keywords: Cabinet dryer; Exergetic improvement potential; Exergetic sustainability index; Exergy; Onion
Year: 2018 PMID: 30505917 PMCID: PMC6251333 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Exergy inflow (kJ/s) at various drying temperatures.
| 65 | 3.7326 | 2.5859 | 6.3185 |
| 75 | 5.7173 | 3.9608 | 9.6781 |
| 85 | 8.0825 | 5.5938 | 13.6763 |
| 95 | 10.8052 | 7.4709 | 18.2761 |
Exergy of dried product (kJ/s) at 65 °C.
| 900 | 2.425892 | 2.471284 | 2.521512 |
| 1200 | 2.378722 | 2.430267 | 2.490297 |
| 1500 | 2.318074 | 2.378996 | 2.452145 |
| 1800 | 2.243950 | 2.317470 | 2.407056 |
| 2100 | 2.156348 | 2.245690 | 2.355030 |
| 2400 | 2.055269 | 2.163655 | 2.296068 |
| 2700 | 1.940713 | 2.071367 | 2.230168 |
| 3000 | 1.812680 | 1.965406 | 2.157332 |
| 3300 | 1.671170 | 1.859445 | 2.081028 |
| 3600 | 1.516182 | 1.743229 | 2.001255 |
Exergy of dried product (kJ/s) at 75 °C.
| 900 | 3.437906 | 3.592653 | 3.739042 |
| 1200 | 3.331977 | 3.497583 | 3.661576 |
| 1500 | 3.197157 | 3.377494 | 3.563452 |
| 1800 | 3.033447 | 3.232387 | 3.475657 |
| 2100 | 2.840847 | 3.062261 | 3.336217 |
| 2400 | 2.619357 | 2.867117 | 3.176120 |
| 2700 | 2.368978 | 2.646955 | 3.000530 |
| 3000 | 2.089708 | 2.401774 | 2.793953 |
| 3300 | 1.781548 | 2.131574 | 2.571883 |
| 3600 | 1.444499 | 1.836356 | 2.329155 |
Exergy of dried product (kJ/s) at 85 °C.
| 900 | 4.330610 | 4.799319 | 5.097298 |
| 1200 | 4.121461 | 4.596531 | 4.919816 |
| 1500 | 3.863101 | 4.346425 | 4.699737 |
| 1800 | 3.555529 | 4.089560 | 4.479659 |
| 2100 | 3.198746 | 3.744821 | 4.174389 |
| 2400 | 2.792751 | 3.352764 | 3.826523 |
| 2700 | 2.337545 | 2.920149 | 3.443161 |
| 3000 | 1.833128 | 2.426698 | 3.003004 |
| 3300 | 1.556313 | 2.196871 | 2.846820 |
| 3600 | 1.279498 | 1.973804 | 2.704834 |
Exergy of dried product (kJ/s) at 95 °C.
| 900 | 5.161715 | 5.769821 | 6.258066 |
| 1200 | 4.788759 | 5.398904 | 5.914313 |
| 1500 | 4.326293 | 4.937318 | 5.482418 |
| 1800 | 3.774318 | 4.385064 | 4.962382 |
| 2100 | 3.132833 | 3.742141 | 4.354203 |
| 2400 | 2.401839 | 3.008549 | 3.657883 |
| 2700 | 2.028882 | 2.515642 | 2.873422 |
| 3000 | 1.700681 | 2.266715 | 2.653067 |
| 3300 | 1.461989 | 1.912283 | 2.450341 |
| 3600 | 1.223297 | 1.730946 | 2.326943 |
Exergy outflow (kJ/s) at 65 °C.
| 900 | 6.158492 | 6.203884 | 6.254112 |
| 1200 | 6.111322 | 6.162867 | 6.222897 |
| 1500 | 6.050674 | 6.111596 | 6.184745 |
| 1800 | 5.976550 | 6.050070 | 6.139656 |
| 2100 | 5.888948 | 5.978290 | 6.087630 |
| 2400 | 5.787869 | 5.896255 | 6.028668 |
| 2700 | 5.673313 | 5.803967 | 5.962768 |
| 3000 | 5.545280 | 5.698006 | 5.889932 |
| 3300 | 5.403770 | 5.592045 | 5.813628 |
| 3600 | 5.248782 | 5.475829 | 5.733855 |
Exergy outflow (kJ/s) at 75 °C.
| 900 | 9.155206 | 9.309953 | 9.456342 |
| 1200 | 9.049277 | 9.214883 | 9.378876 |
| 1500 | 8.914457 | 9.094794 | 9.280752 |
| 1800 | 8.750747 | 8.949687 | 9.192957 |
| 2100 | 8.558147 | 8.779561 | 9.053517 |
| 2400 | 8.336657 | 8.584417 | 8.893420 |
| 2700 | 8.086278 | 8.364255 | 8.717830 |
| 3000 | 7.807008 | 8.119074 | 8.511253 |
| 3300 | 7.498848 | 7.848874 | 8.289183 |
| 3600 | 7.161799 | 7.553656 | 8.046455 |
Exergy outflow (kJ/s) at 85 °C.
| 900 | 12.41311 | 12.88182 | 13.17980 |
| 1200 | 12.20396 | 12.67903 | 13.00232 |
| 1500 | 11.94560 | 12.42893 | 12.78224 |
| 1800 | 11.63803 | 12.17206 | 12.56216 |
| 2100 | 11.28125 | 11.82732 | 12.25689 |
| 2400 | 10.87525 | 11.43526 | 11.90902 |
| 2700 | 10.42005 | 11.00265 | 11.52566 |
| 3000 | 9.915628 | 10.50920 | 11.08550 |
| 3300 | 9.638813 | 10.27937 | 10.92932 |
| 3600 | 9.361998 | 10.05630 | 10.78733 |
Exergy outflow (kJ/s) at 95 °C.
| 900 | 15.96692 | 16.57502 | 17.06327 |
| 1200 | 15.59396 | 16.20410 | 16.71951 |
| 1500 | 15.13149 | 15.74252 | 16.28762 |
| 1800 | 14.57952 | 15.19026 | 15.76758 |
| 2100 | 13.93803 | 14.54734 | 15.15940 |
| 2400 | 13.20704 | 13.81375 | 14.46308 |
| 2700 | 12.83408 | 13.32084 | 13.67862 |
| 3000 | 12.50588 | 13.07192 | 13.45827 |
| 3300 | 12.26719 | 12.71748 | 13.25554 |
| 3600 | 12.02850 | 12.53615 | 13.13214 |
Exergy loss (kJ/s) at 65 °C.
| 900 | 0.160008 | 0.114616 | 0.064388 |
| 1200 | 0.207178 | 0.155633 | 0.095603 |
| 1500 | 0.267826 | 0.206904 | 0.133755 |
| 1800 | 0.341950 | 0.268430 | 0.178844 |
| 2100 | 0.429552 | 0.340210 | 0.230870 |
| 2400 | 0.530631 | 0.422245 | 0.289832 |
| 2700 | 0.645187 | 0.514533 | 0.355732 |
| 3000 | 0.773220 | 0.620494 | 0.428568 |
| 3300 | 0.914730 | 0.726455 | 0.504872 |
| 3600 | 1.069718 | 0.842671 | 0.584645 |
Exergy loss (kJ/s) at 75 °C.
| 900 | 0.522894 | 0.368147 | 0.221758 |
| 1200 | 0.628823 | 0.463217 | 0.299224 |
| 1500 | 0.763643 | 0.583306 | 0.397348 |
| 1800 | 0.927353 | 0.728413 | 0.485143 |
| 2100 | 1.119953 | 0.898539 | 0.624583 |
| 2400 | 1.341443 | 1.093683 | 0.784680 |
| 2700 | 1.591822 | 1.313845 | 0.960270 |
| 3000 | 1.871092 | 1.559026 | 1.166847 |
| 3300 | 2.179252 | 1.829226 | 1.388917 |
| 3600 | 2.516301 | 2.124444 | 1.631645 |
Exergy loss (kJ/s) at 85 °C.
| 900 | 1.26319 | 0.79448 | 0.49650 |
| 1200 | 1.47234 | 0.99727 | 0.67398 |
| 1500 | 1.73070 | 1.24737 | 0.89406 |
| 1800 | 2.03827 | 1.50424 | 1.11414 |
| 2100 | 2.39505 | 1.84898 | 1.41941 |
| 2400 | 2.80105 | 2.24104 | 1.76728 |
| 2700 | 3.25625 | 2.67365 | 2.15064 |
| 3000 | 3.76067 | 3.16710 | 2.5908 |
| 3300 | 4.03748 | 3.39693 | 2.74698 |
| 3600 | 4.31430 | 3.62000 | 2.88897 |
Exergy loss (kJ/s) at 95 °C.
| 900 | 2.30918 | 1.70108 | 1.21283 |
| 1200 | 2.68214 | 2.07200 | 1.55659 |
| 1500 | 3.14461 | 2.53358 | 1.98848 |
| 1800 | 3.69658 | 3.08584 | 2.50852 |
| 2100 | 4.33807 | 3.72876 | 3.11670 |
| 2400 | 5.06906 | 4.46235 | 3.81302 |
| 2700 | 5.44202 | 4.95526 | 4.59748 |
| 3000 | 5.77022 | 5.20418 | 4.81783 |
| 3300 | 6.00891 | 5.55862 | 5.02056 |
| 3600 | 6.24760 | 5.73995 | 5.14396 |
Fig. 1a: Exergy efficiency at 65 °C drying temperature. b: Exergy efficiency at 75 °C drying temperature. c: Exergy efficiency at 85 °C drying temperature. d: Exergy efficiency at 85 °C drying temperature.
Fig. 2a: Exergetic sustainability index at 65 °C. b: Exergetic sustainability index at 75 °C. c: Exergetic sustainability index at 85 °C. d: Exergetic sustainability index at 95 °C.
Fig. 3a: Exergetic improvement potential at 65 °C. b: Exergetic improvement potential at 75 °C. c: Exergetic improvement potential at 85 °C. d: Exergetic improvement potential at 95 °C.
| Subject area | Chemical Engineering |
| More specific subject area | Thermodynamics |
| Type of data | Tables, figures, images, |
| How data was acquired | Experimental |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
| Experimental factors | Energy usage optimization in drying process depends on various factors such as air temperature, feeding rates, relative humidity or wet-bulb depression, air velocity, air mass flow rate and particles size, shape and arrangement. |
| Experimental features | Exergy analysis in terms of exergy inflow, exergy of dried product, exergy outflow, exergy loss, exergy efficiency, exergetic sustainability index and exergetic improvement potential of drying process of onion in a cabinet dryer at different drying periods were evaluated under drying temperatures of 65 °C,75 °C,85 °C and 95 °C and particle thickness of 0.50 cm,1.00 cm and 1.50 cm. |
| Data source location | Nigeria. |
| Data accessibility | Data are available within this article |
| Related research article | None |