| Literature DB >> 30505818 |
Umme K Rima1, Abu S M Bari2, Mohammad Z Hossain3, Mohammad A H Khan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate hyperplasia and neoplasia are major illness of men and elderly dogs. Treatment of prostate cancer requires androgen deprivation surgery or therapy to prevent metastases and alleviate pain. Recently, six DNA vaccines have entered clinical trials against prostate cancer in humans with limited success. There is a need for new therapies that delay the establishment of malignancy and prolong survival.Entities:
Keywords: Atrophy of prostate; GnRH-I; Mice; Plasmid DNA vaccine; Serum testosterone
Year: 2018 PMID: 30505818 PMCID: PMC6251954 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prostate Int ISSN: 2287-8882
Fig. 1The figure shows group average anti-GnRH-I antibody response (OD value, IgG Ab) and serum testosterone concentration (green and blue bars) in male mice as detected by ELISA and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Immunization of mice showed an early anti-GnRH-I antibody response in the study week 3 (0.613 ± 0.179), sharply rose the response until the study week 12 (1.205 ± 0.219, P < 0.001), and then, showed a declining tendency (0.817 ± 0.119) in the study week 24. Serum testosterone concentration (ng/ml) in vaccinated mice was significantlyreduced (P < 0.005) after 6 weeksof immunization (5.351 ± 1.173), and very low level of serum testosteroneconcentration (0.761 ± 0.531, P < 0.000)was seen in the study week 24 compared with the unaffected serum testosterone concentration level (7.583 ± 1.251) in control mice.
Immunization did not reflect any effect onto body weight gain. In study weeks 12 and 24, there was significant (*P < 0.01 and **P < 0.001, respectively) reduction in the combined weight of the prostate and seminal vesicle of vaccinated mice. There was also significant reduction of % weight of the prostate and SV in the Group 1 mice in study weeks 12 (*P < 0.05) and 24 (**P < 0.001). The values expressed were group average ± SD
| Criteria analyzed (group average) | Mice immunized with the vaccine ( | Control mice ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 3 | Week 6 | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 24 | |
| Body weight (BW) in g | 36.00 ± 0.81 | 40.25 ± 1.25 | 46.72 ± 1.23 | 50.50 ± 1.29 | 51.13 ± 2.3 |
| Combined weight of the prostate and seminal vesicle (SV) in mg | 427.43 ± 37.11 | 457.39 ± 49.1 | 438.85 ± 28.51* | 319.75 ± 89.19** | 563.25 ± 108.60 |
| % of combined weight of the prostate and SV (per 100 g BW of mice) | 1.186 ± 0.21 | 1.136 ± 0.17 | 0.939 ± 0.29* | 0.751 ± 0.16** | 1.101 ± 0.31 |
Fig. 2Sections of the control (A and C) andvaccinated (B and D) prostate gland obtained in the study week 24 and stained with Goldner's trichrome. The stored secretion in tubules of the glands (A, arrow, 10×) appeared bright pink in the control section, which however was scanty in the vaccinated prostate (B, arrow, 10×). The lining cells of the controlprostate appeared taller and the cells were enfolded in the glandular lumen (C,arrow, 40×). The lining epithelial cells of the vaccinated prostate appeared shorter (D, arrow, 40×), lower in densities and did not enfold in its lumen.