Literature DB >> 30505723

Quantitative CT assessment of lung injury after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine cardiac arrest model of different downtimes.

Zhifeng Liu1, Qingyu Liu1,2, Gongfa Wu1, Haigang Li1,2, Yue Wang2, Rui Chen2, Cai Wen2, Qin Ling1, Zhengfei Yang1,2,3, Wanchun Tang1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Utilize quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to detect and evaluate the severity of lung injury after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a porcine cardiac arrest (CA) model with different downtimes.
METHODS: Twenty-one male domestic pigs weighing 38±3 kg were randomized into 3 groups: the sham group (n=5), the ventricular fibrillation (VF) 5 min (VF5) group (n=8), and the VF 10 min (VF10) group (n=8). VF was induced and untreated for 5 (VF5 group) or 10 (VF10 group) min before the commencement of manual CPR. Eight animals (8/8, 100%) in VF5 and 6 (6/8, 75%) in VF10 were successfully resuscitated. Chest QCT scans and arterial blood gas tests were performed at baseline and 6 h post-resuscitation. The QCT score, volume, and weight of ground-glass opacification (GGO), which was defined as poorly aerated regions with a CT value ranging from -500 Hounsfield units (HU) to -100 HU, and intense parenchymal opacification (IPO), which was defined as a non-aerated area with a CT value greater than -100 HU, were quantitatively measured.
RESULTS: Significantly shorter durations of CPR and fewer defibrillations were observed in the VF5 group compared with the VF10 group [duration of CPR: VF5 (6±0 minutes) versus VF10 (8.3±1.5 minutes), P<0.05; numbers of defibrillation: VF5 (1±0) versus VF10 (2.2±0.8), P<0.05]. Compared with the baseline or sham animals, declining gas exchanges (end-tidal CO2, PO2, oxygen index) were observed in both VF groups; however, there were no significant differences in gas exchanges between the VF groups. Compared with the VF5 group, the GGO QCT score, volume, and weight were significantly greater in the VF10 group (P=0.002, 0.001, and 0.002 respectively), while no significant differences were found in the IPO QCT score, volume, or weight between two the VF groups (P=0.354, 0.447, and 0.512 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: QCT analysis enables unique non-invasive assessments of different lung injuries (IPO and GGO lesions) that can clearly distinguish heterogeneous lesions and allow for early detection and quantitative monitoring of the severity of lung injury following CPR. QCT could provide a basis for clinical early ventilation strategy management after CPR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung injury; cardiac arrest (CA); cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); computed tomography (CT)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505723      PMCID: PMC6218205          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.10.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  36 in total

Review 1.  What has computed tomography taught us about the acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Authors:  L Gattinoni; P Caironi; P Pelosi; L R Goodman
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Resuscitation after cardiac arrest: a 3-phase time-sensitive model.

Authors:  Myron L Weisfeldt; Lance B Becker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Dynamic computed tomography: a novel technique to study lung aeration and atelectasis formation during experimental CPR.

Authors:  Klaus Markstaller; Jens Karmrodt; Marcus Doebrich; Benno Wolcke; Hendrik Gervais; Norbert Weiler; Manfred Thelen; Wolfgang Dick; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Balthasar Eberle
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Successful Resuscitation From In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest--What Happens Next?

Authors:  Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Multidetector CT findings of skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Hyuk Jun Yang; Yon Mi Sung; So Hyun Cho; Jeong Ho Kim; Hyung Sik Kim; Hye-Young Choi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Quantitative volumetric assessment of pulmonary involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Mehmet Güli Çetinçakmak; Cemil Göya; Cihad Hamidi; Güven Tekbaş; Özlem Abakay; İbrahim Batmaz; Salih Hattapoğlu; Alpaslan Yavuz; Aslan Bilici
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-02

7.  Quantitative CT assessment of emphysema and airways in relation to lung cancer risk.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Preethi Guniganti; Blake J Newman; Mark T Dransfield; Paul A Kvale; David A Lynch; Thomas K Pilgram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  A systematic review and pooled analysis of CPR-associated cardiovascular and thoracic injuries.

Authors:  Andrew C Miller; Shannon F Rosati; Anthony F Suffredini; David S Schrump
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Multidetector CT and radiographic findings of lung injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  So Hyun Cho; Eun Young Kim; Seung Joon Choi; Yoon Kyung Kim; Yon Mi Sung; Hye-Young Choi; Jinseong Cho; Hyuk Jun Yang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Compression depth of 30 mm has similar efficacy and fewer complications versus 50 mm during mechanical chest compression with miniaturized chest compressor in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Lian Liang; Zuyong Li; Ran Chen; Siqi Liu; Tianen Zhou; Longyuan Jiang; Wanchun Tang; Jun Jiang; Zhengfei Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Computed-Tomography as First-line Diagnostic Procedure in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  John Adel; Muharrem Akin; Vera Garcheva; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Johann Bauersachs; L Christian Napp; Andreas Schäfer
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.