| Literature DB >> 30505637 |
Dany Garant1, Audrey Bourret1, Clarence Schmitt2, Audrey Turcotte1, Fanie Pelletier1, Marc Bélisle1.
Abstract
Genetic diversity at immune genes and levels of parasitism are known to affect patterns of (dis)assortative mating in several species. Heterozygote advantage and/or good genes should shape mate choice originating from pathogen/parasite-driven selection at immune genes. However, the stability of these associations, and whether they vary with environmental conditions, are still rarely documented. In this study, we describe mating patterns in a wild population of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) over 4 years and assess the effects of haemosporidian parasite infection and immune genetic diversity at β-defensin genes on those patterns within two habitats of contrasting environmental quality, in southern Québec, Canada. We first show that mating patterns were only very weakly related to individual status of infection by haemosporidian parasites. However, we found a difference between habitats in mating patterns related to infection status, which was likely due to a non-random distribution of individuals, as non-infected mating pairs were more frequent in lower quality habitats. Mating patterns also differed depending on β-defensin heterozygosity at AvBD2, but only for genetic partners outside of the social couple, with heterozygous individuals pairing together. Our study underlines the importance of considering habitat heterogeneity in studies of sexual selection.Entities:
Keywords: Haemosporidian parasites; Human-driven changes; Immune genes; Mating patterns; Tree swallow
Year: 2018 PMID: 30505637 PMCID: PMC6254242 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Sample sizes for adult Tree swallows (total number of individuals sampled per year) included in analyses and known infection status by haemosporidian parasites or genetic diversity at two β-defensin genes.
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasite infection | |||||
| Females | 132 | 132 | 177 | 173 | 614 |
| Males | 138 | 144 | 187 | 177 | 646 |
| AvBD2 | |||||
| Females | 26 | 46 | 72 | ||
| Males | 33 | 63 | 96 | ||
| AvBD7 | |||||
| Females | 31 | 49 | 80 | ||
| Males | 37 | 65 | 102 |
Notes.
total number of individuals (including multiple records of individuals across years)
Figure 1Difference in proportions of observed and expected mating pairs.
(A) Females non-infected by haemosporidian parasites, (B) infected females, (C) homozygous females at AvBD2 locus and (D) heterozygous females at AvBD2, paired with either social (S) or genetic males (G). White bars represent non-infected (A, B) or homozygote (C, D) males, and grey bars, infected (A, B) or heterozygote (C, D) males. P-values (*P < 0.1; **P < 0.05) are shown. Significance threshold (P < 0.05) in each case is represented by a dashed line.
Figure 2Proportions of observed mating pairs between habitats.
White bars: intensive; grey bars: non-intensive as function of infection status by haemosporidian parasites (A, B; non-infected: 0, infected: 1) or heterozygosity at AvBD2 locus (C, D; homozygote: 0, heterozygote: 1), for social couples (A, C) and genetic couples (B, D). P-values (***P < 0.001) are also shown.