| Literature DB >> 30505615 |
Cathleen Wigand1, Elizabeth B Watson2, Rose Martin1, David S Johnson3, R Scott Warren4, Alana Hanson1, Earl Davey1, Roxanne Johnson1, Linda Deegan5.
Abstract
In a whole-ecosystem, nutrient addition experiment in the Plum Island Sound Estuary (Massachusetts), we tested the effects of nitrogen enrichment on the carbon and nitrogen contents, respiration, and strength of marsh soils. We measured soil shear strength within and across vegetation zones. We found significantly higher soil percent organic matter, carbon, and nitrogen in the long-term enriched marshes and higher soil respiration rates with longer duration of enrichment. The soil strength was similar in magnitude across depths and vegetation zones in the reference creeks, but showed signs of significant nutrient-mediated alteration in enriched creeks where shear strength at rooting depths of the low marsh-high marsh interface zone was significantly lower than at the sub-rooting depths or in the creek bank vegetation zone. To more closely examine the soil strength of the rooting (10-30 cm) and sub-rooting (40-60 cm) depths in the interface and creek bank vegetation zones, we calculated a vertical shear strength differential between these depths. We found significantly lower differentials in shear strength (rooting depth < sub-rooting depths) in the enriched creeks and in the interface zones. The discontinuities in the vertical and horizontal shear strength across the enriched marshes may contribute to observed fracturing and slumping occurring in the marsh systems. Tide gauge data also showed a pattern of rapid sea level rise for the period of the study, and changes in plant distribution patterns were indicative of increased flooding. Longer exposure times to nutrient-enriched waters and increased hydraulic energy associated with sea level rise may exacerbate creek bank sloughing. Additional research is needed, however, to better understand the interactions of nutrient enrichment and sea level rise on soil shear strength and stability of tidal salt marshes.Entities:
Keywords: eutrophication; marsh loss; sea level rise; soil shear strength; wetland soil
Year: 2018 PMID: 30505615 PMCID: PMC6260945 DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecosphere Impact factor: 3.171
Soil shear strength (kPa) measurements (units ± SE) for reference and enrichment at 10 cm increments from 10 to 90 cm depths, and means (reported in boldface) of the 10–30, 40–60, and 70–90 cm depth intervals across creek bank, interface, and high marsh vegetation zones.
| Parameters | Depth (cm) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | |
| Short-term reference | |||||||||
| Creek bank | 19.3 ± 2.6 | 25.8± 5.4 | 25.5 ± 2.5 | 24.5 ± 2.9 | 21.7± 2.7 | 20.2 ± 3.6 | 22.0 ± 4.6 | 27.5± 4.0 | 34.8 ± 5.7 |
| Interface | 37.8 ±7.6 | 23.5 ± 1.8 | 23.3 ± 1.5 | 23.3 ± 1.7 | 26.3 ± 2.8 | 27.5 ± 1.6 | 27.5 ± 2.1 | 29.0 ± 2.8 | 31.3 ± 4.2 |
| High marsh | 28.0 ± 5.0 | 24.8 ± 4.6 | 24.0 ± 3.6 | 21.5 ± 3.7 | 21.0 ± 2.3 | 22.0 ± 3.3 | 25.3 ± 2.0 | 22.8 ± 2.9 | 23.8 ± 3.7 |
| Long-term reference | |||||||||
| Creek bank | 22.3 ± 4.6 | 26.5 ± 6.2 | 23.8 ± 3.8 | 17.5 ± 2.3 | 20.0 ± 3.4 | 18.0 ± 3.7 | 19.3 ± 3.2 | 22.8 ± 5.3 | 24.3 ± 4.9 |
| Interface | 25.0 ± 3.0 | 21.3 ± 2.7 | 21.8 ± 2.3 | 21.0 ± 2.1 | 25.5 ± 2.6 | 24.0 ± 2.6 | 23.8 ± 2.0 | 28.0 ± 2.4 | 30.0 ± 3.3 |
| High marsh | 25.8 ± 2.1 | 25.8 ± 3.6 | 23.0 ± 2.0 | 23.1 ± 2.4 | 23.4 ± 1.8 | 25.8 ± 2.1 | 28.0 ± 3.0 | 27.0 ± 3.0 | 27.0 ± 3.6 |
| Short-term enrichment | |||||||||
| Creek bank | 19.0 ± 2.2 | 24.5 ± 2.7 | 26.3 ± 3.5 | 22.5 ± 2.9 | 22.1 ± 2.5 | 20.8 ± 4.3 | 25.4 ± 4.7 | 29.3 ± 4.1 | 29.5 ± 5.4 |
| Interface | 18.0 ± 1.7 | 18.6 ± 1.9 | 19.4 ± 3.3 | 20.3 ± 3.5 | 23.8 ± 4.3 | 30.5 ± 1.9 | 27.8 ± 3.6 | 24.8 ± 3.8 | 27.5 ± 3.8 |
| High marsh | 31.3 ± 7.8 | 25.1 ± 3.1 | 27.3 ± 2.5 | 30.3 ± 1.4 | 27.4 ± 4.6 | 21.5 ± 2.8 | 22.8 ± 4.6 | 18.6 ± 3.1 | 22.5 ± 2.9 |
| Long-term enrichment | |||||||||
| Creek bank | 18.8 ± 4.0 | 27.3 ± 4.0 | 24.0 ± 3.5 | 22.5 ± 3.3 | 24.2 ± 3.1 | 21.0 ± 4.2 | 21.5 ± 3.5 | 21.5 ± 3.5 | 25.5 ± 2.7 |
| Interface | 19.0 ± 2.0 | 17.8 ± 2.0 | 19.8 ± 1.5 | 27.3 ± 1.2 | 30.5 ± 2.7 | 34.0 ± 2.1 | 31.8 ± 2.5 | 31.2 ± 2.9 | 34.0 ± 2.7 |
| High marsh | 19.9 ± 1.8 | 22.5 ± 1.9 | 32.0 ± 3.1 | 29.3 ± 1.9 | 30.5 ± 2.1 | 31.8 ± 2.2 | 33.3 ± 3.6 | 29.0 ± 3.1 | 30.8 ± 3.1 |
Notes: Abbreviations are creek bank, creek bank tall Spartina alterniflora; high marsh, Spartina patens-dominated high marsh; interface, mixed S. alterniflora, S. patens, and Distichlis spicata vegetation between creek bank and high marsh. Mean shear strengths for zones were calculated across sampling locations (n = 8 per treatment). Mean 30 cm depth interval shear strengths were calculated by averaging 10 cm depth measurements (10–30, 40–60, 70–90 cm) for each.
Fig. 1.Visual representation of average shear strengths for high marsh (HM), interface, and creek bank (CB) vegetation zones at depth intervals of 10–30, 40–60, and 70–90 cm for the short- and long-term enrichment and reference creeks.
Fig. 2.Vertical shear strength differentials for short- and long-term reference (A, C) and enriched (B, D) sites at creek bank and interface (between tall Spartina alterniflora and high marsh) vegetation zones. Positive means indicate stronger root zone (10–30 cm depth) shear strengths than sub-root zone (40–60 cm depth) soil, while negative means indicate the opposite pattern.
Fig. 3.Soil respiration rates for short- and long-term reference and nutrient-enriched sites. Standard error bars are shown. Letters represent results of Tukey HSD tests. Bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different.
Fig. 4.Soil percent organic matter (A), percent carbon (B), and percent nitrogen (C) from the long-term reference (dashed line) and enriched (solid line) sites. Standard error bars are shown.
Fig. 5.Summer (May–September) mean high water (MHW, m above station datum) and mean sea level (MSL, m above station datum) at Boston and Portland. Period of vegetation sampling for the TIDE nutrient enrichment experiment (2003–2011; Deegan et al. 2012) is indicated by horizontal arrow.
Fig. 6.Cover changes in the dominant high marsh grasses, Spartina patens, Distichlis spicata, and tall, Spartina alterniflora from 2004 to 2011. Combined nutrient-enriched and reference creek data demonstrate significant increases in tall S. alterniflora and D. spicata with a coincident decrease in S. patens (S. alterniflora graph after Johnson et al. 2016).