Literature DB >> 30505225

The assessment of radio-adaptive response in graves' hyperthyroidism patients following radioactive iodine uptake.

Zahra Fazeli1, Ali Shabestani Monfared2, Seyed Rasoul Zakavi3, Mehrangiz Amiri4, Ebrahim Zabihi5, Sajad Borzoueisileh5, Amir Gholami4, Kourosh Ebrahimnejad Gorji6.   

Abstract

Low doses of radiation affect the response of cells to higher doses; this phenomenon is called radio-adaptive response, which leads to increased resistance to subsequent higher doses. We have investigated the adaptive response using 0.37 MBq priming dose of I-131 followed by 296-444 MBq challenging dose in peripheral human lymphocyte cells. The study was performed on 42 patients with Graves' disease and 29 healthy adult persons as a control group. The patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, patients were referred for radioactive iodine therapy with a specific dose, and iodine was given to them on the day of referral. In the second group, patients were referred for radioactive iodine uptake and radioactive iodine therapy, and iodine uptake was initially performed, then 24 h later, iodine therapy was done. In both groups, 1 month after treatment, blood samples were taken to cytokinesis-block micronucleus (MN) assay. The number of MN in binuclear lymphocyte cells was counted as an end point test. The mean frequency of MN in first, second, and control groups was 75.86 ± 12.68, 71.45 ± 12.56, and 20.06 ± 7.30, respectively. Our results showed that the frequency of total chromosome aberration in both radiation groups was higher than controls. However, in the first group was higher than another group, but their difference was not statistically significant. According to the results, we cannot approve the hypothesis that 0.37 MBq I-131 administration before iodine therapy could induce a radio-adaptive response in lymphocytes of Graves' patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radioactive iodine therapy; radio-adaptive response; radioactive iodine uptake

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505225      PMCID: PMC6216742          DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_83_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Nucl Med        ISSN: 1450-1147


INTRODUCTION

Hyperthyroidism is a common disease that was reported in about 1% of the human population with clinical sign of tachycardia, tremor, stare, sweating, and lagophthalmos and the most common etiologies of hyperthyroidism are Graves' disease and toxic nodular goiter.[1] In Graves' disease, an antibody, thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin, is produced and binds to thyroid-stimulating hormone receptors which promote cell growth and thyroid hormone secretion.[2] In nodular goiter, hyperthyroidism could be induced from the hyperfunction of one or more nodules.[3] Several methods are used in the process of diagnosis and treatment of hyperthyroidism including thyroid function tests, thyroid antibody studies, radioactive iodine uptake (RAIU), and thyroid scintigraphy.[4] One of the potential therapies for hyperthyroidism is RAI-131 therapy. RAI therapy is performed by administration of I-131 which is a beta and gamma emitter radionuclide with a half-life of about 8 days. The emitted beta particles can induce apoptosis and cell death achieving therapy goals,[5] and the associated gamma emissions can be simultaneously used for thyroid imaging and measurement of thyroid uptake. A radioactive dose of I-131 for the treatment of hyperthyroidism may be defined either by clinical estimation, using physical examination or by calculating of thyroid uptake (RAIU) first. RAIU includes measuring thyroid absorption using a small dose of I-131 may lead to the stunning of thyroid cells, which could prevent the optimal effect of treatment.[6] Applying a small dose of radiation can increase the resistance of cells against damage from higher doses, this phenomenon is called radio-adaptive response which was reported in many studies in areas with high radiation background[7] and confirmed in both in vitro and in vivo studies.[8] The mechanism of radio-adaptive response is not well understood, but the immune system involved and seems it is a biological defense mechanism, in which low-dose ionizing irradiation causes cellular resistance to the genotoxic effects of subsequent irradiation.[9] Chromosomal repair mechanisms and radioprotective agents are claimed to be involved in this process.[10] Cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus (CBMN) assay method is a sensitive indicator of in vivo radiation exposure in patients undergoing fractionated partial-body radiotherapy. Furthermore, previous studies are supporting the application of the CBMN assay for biological dosimetry. The number of radiation-induced MN is strongly correlated with dose and quality of radiation.[1112] The adaptive response could influence the success rate of treatment. Therefore, the study of radio-adaptive response phenomenon in hyperthyroid patients may be necessary. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of pretherapy thyroid uptake on chromosomal aberrations and radiation resistance in following radioiodine therapy in patients with hyperthyroidism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

We have studied 42 patients with Graves' disease, who were referred to the nuclear medicine clinic for RAI therapy, and 29 healthy men and women as a control group that did not have a history of radiation exposure. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, lactation, and consumption of iodine-rich foods or medications. Forty-two patients (male = 12 and female = 30; mean age = 48.68 ± 13.96 years) were studied including 20 patients in RAI therapy with RAIU group (14 females and 6 males, with mean age = 50.0 ± 13.17 years and mean of weight 67.15 kg). Furthermore, 22 patients in the RAI therapy without RAIU group (16 females and 6 males, with mean age = 46.6 ± 14.7 years and mean weight of 66.59 kg) were included. At the time of referral to the clinic, all patients were given an iodine treatment readiness sheet. In the RAI therapy without RAIU group (Group 1), we first measured the amount of I-131 was requested by an endocrinologist using CRC® -25R Dose Calibrator (CAPINTEC, INC, USA). Then, we administered it to the patient. It is worth noting that these patients did not receive any I-131 doses before RAI therapy, and the dose was defined according to the patient's clinical examinations and varied from 296 to 444 MBq. In the RAI therapy with RAIU group (Group 2), we initially performed the RAIU for the patients so that we measured a capsule containing 0.37 MBq of I-131 by the Picker Gamma counter. We then administered it to the patient, 24 h after, treatment dose was calculated according to the Quimby-Marinelli formula which eventually determined 5.55 MBq of I-131 per gram of thyroid weight by a specialist in nuclear medicine. Finally, we measured the amount of iodine needed by the dose calibrator (Capintec), and we administered it to the patient (296–444 MBq I-131 entirely). We also studied a control group (N = 29, 18 females and 11 males; mean age = 34.76 ± 7.4 years and mean weight = 67.41 kg) who did not receive any diagnostic or therapeutic and occupational exposure and also they did not have any history of smoking, tobacco chewing, or alcohol consumption. The mean weight difference between the first and the second groups was not statistically significant which was essential for dose distribution of radionuclides. We used standard radioisotope dosimetry tables which were valid for adults (Annals of ICRP-80 1999). There was no drug used by donors for at least 1 month before sampling.

Micronuclei assay

For evaluation of chromosomal aberration, we have used micronuclei (MN) assay. Briefly, 5 ml of peripheral blood from a hyperthyroidism patient was collected in a heparinized vial 1 month after radioiodine therapy and cytogenetically evaluated using MN assay. 0.5 ml of whole blood was added to 4.5 ml culture medium (containing RPMI-1640 [Gibco-BRL] supplemented with 0.2 mM L-glutamine, 15% fetal calf serum [Gibco-BRL], 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin). Then, phytohemagglutinin (Gibco-BRL) at a concentration of 100 μl/5 ml was added to stimulate the division of lymphocytes in the samples. After 44 h incubation, cytochalasin B (100 μl/5 ml culture) was added. The cell flasks were further incubated at 37°C for another 28 h. The cells were centrifuged for 10 min (1200 rpm) then they were treated with 0.075 M KCl and were centrifuged for 7 min (1000 rpm). Then, the cells were fixed in a 6:1 mixture of methanol: glacial acetic acid and were centrifuged for 7 min (1000 rpm) which was repeated twice more. Then, the cells were dropped onto cooled, clean slides, and they were dried in the open air. Slides were stained with 15% Giemsa (Merck), and chromosomal aberrations were scored.

Ethical consideration and statistical analysis

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Babol University of Medical Sciences. The written informed consent was obtained from the participants before the study. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA for comparing age and weight of participants in three groups and Chi-square test was performed to compare gender and received dose frequency of participants. The Student's t-test (independent samples t-test) was used to compare the number of the micronucleus in binucleated lymphocytes between two radiation and control groups. To compare the number of the micronucleus in binucleated lymphocyte between two radiation groups, we used Student's t-test.

RESULTS

In this study, the mean age of all participants was 48.68 ± 13.96 years. Furthermore, the mean age of the patients was 50.0 ± 13.17 years in the RAI with RAIU group and 46.6 ± 14.7 years in the RAI without RAIU group. Nevertheless, no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P = 0.512). The other demographic characteristics of radiations and control groups are presented in Table 1. In total, 28.6% of the patients were male and 71.4% were female. There was no significant difference observed between the two radiation groups in this regard (χ2 = 0.038, P = 0.845). Furthermore, comparison of the frequency of received doses indicated no significant difference between the groups (χ2 = 0.35, P = 0.554).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of radiations and control groups

Demographic characteristics of radiations and control groups The mean frequency of micronucleated-binucleate lymphocyte in the radiation and control groups is shown in Figure 1. Results also showed that the mean frequency of total chromosomal aberration in two groups was higher than controls, and in RAI therapy without RAIU group was higher than another group, but there was no statistically significant difference found between both radiation groups (t = 1.131 P = 0.265).
Figure 1

The mean frequency of micronucleated binucleate lymphocyte in the radioactive iodine uptake + (Group 1) and radioactive iodine uptake − (Group 2) and control (Group 3)

The mean frequency of micronucleated binucleate lymphocyte in the radioactive iodine uptake + (Group 1) and radioactive iodine uptake − (Group 2) and control (Group 3)

DISCUSSION

The frequency of chromosomal aberration in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients treated with radioiodine I-131 for hyperthyroidism, with or without previous thyroid RAIU with I-131, was studied. Our results showed that the mean frequency of total chromosome aberration in two groups was higher than control which was expected because of received radiation doses. Our results also showed that the frequency of chromosomal aberration in RAI therapy without RAIU group was higher than RAI therapy with RAIU group, but no statistically significant difference is detectable between two radiation groups. Based on the results of a study by Monfared et al.,[13] 99mTc in diagnostic doses did not increase chromosome aberration produced by subsequent exposure and surprisingly reduced the chromosomal aberrations resulting from the subsequent exposure to I-131. Thus, pre-exposure by 99mTc could induce resistance to a subsequent higher radiation dose of I-131 due to cytogenetic radio-adaptive response. Their results also are in agreement with the study of Ikushima et al.[14] which have reported the cell adaptation by priming exposure with 5 cGy of γ-rays. Monsieurs et al. showed that a significant decrease in the in vitro induced MN in the blood sample after I-131 administration compared with that of the blood sample taken before therapy. They noted that adaptation could be achieved by the iodine therapy, in vivo, causing declination in the cytogenetic damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes after in vitro irradiation as a challenge dose.[15] In the study by Gourabi, the cytogenetic responses of 24 medical radiation workers to 1–2 Gy γ-irradiation in comparison with 13 nonexposed persons have been studied. CBMN assay of lymphocytes revealed that although the frequencies of spontaneous MN in radiation workers are more than nonexposed, after 1–2 Gy in vitro irradiation of lymphocytes, this frequency was found to be lower for radiation workers.[16] Shirani et al. examined CHO-K1 and lymphocyte cells that were individually exposed to different doses of γ rays. The frequency of MN increased significantly with increasing radiation dose in both lymphocytes and CHO-K1 cells. Nonetheless, they have reported that there was no significant difference between control and those exposed to 0.2 Gy.[17] Coleman et al. investigated the adaptive cytogenetic response of human lymphoblastoid cell lines exposed to 5 cGy (priming dose) followed by 2 Gy (challenge dose) compared to cells that received a single 2 Gy dose. Moreover, by evaluation of gene expression, they concluded that low doses could produce radiation resistance.[18] In the present study, we observed the difference between the groups regarding frequency of MN in lymphocytes which were lower in the RAI therapy with RAIU group, compared to the RAI therapy without RAIU group. However, this difference was not statistically significant; it seems that about 0.37 MBq dose of I-131 pretreatment had no significant impact on the frequency of MN in lymphocytes. However, the exact amount of I-131 doses required for inducing radio-adaptive response remains a matter of debate.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this research, we found no significant difference between the study groups regarding the frequency of MN in lymphocytes, but due to the lower levels in patients who received fewer doses of the radionuclide, further studies are needed in this regard. We cannot approve the hypothesis that 0.37 MBq priming dose of I-131 for RAIU could induce a radio-adaptive response in lymphocytes of hyperthyroidism patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was funded and approved by the Deputy of Research and Technology, Babol University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  11 in total

Review 1.  The micronucleus assay as a biological dosimeter of in vivo ionising radiation exposure.

Authors:  Anne Vral; Michael Fenech; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  A cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus study of the radioadaptive response of lymphocytes of individuals occupationally exposed to chronic doses of radiation.

Authors:  H Gourabi; H Mozdarani
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Radioadaptive response: efficient repair of radiation-induced DNA damage in adapted cells.

Authors:  T Ikushima; H Aritomi; J Morisita
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-11-04       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  EANM procedure guidelines for therapy of benign thyroid disease.

Authors:  Marcel P M Stokkel; Daria Handkiewicz Junak; Michael Lassmann; Markus Dietlein; Markus Luster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Adaptive response in patients treated with 131I.

Authors:  M A Monsieurs; H M Thierens; A M Vral; C Van De Wiele; L I De Ridder; R A Dierckx
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Low-dose irradiation alters the transcript profiles of human lymphoblastoid cells including genes associated with cytogenetic radioadaptive response.

Authors:  Matthew A Coleman; Eric Yin; Leif E Peterson; David Nelson; Karen Sorensen; James D Tucker; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  A novel thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin bioassay is a functional indicator of activity and severity of Graves' orbitopathy.

Authors:  S D Lytton; K A Ponto; M Kanitz; N Matheis; L D Kohn; G J Kahaly
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  DNA damage response pathway in radioadaptive response.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Yosuke Ejima; Akira Tachibana; Toshiko Yamada; Kanji Ishizaki; Takashi Shimizu; Taisei Nomura
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  The cytokinesis-block micronucleus technique: a detailed description of the method and its application to genotoxicity studies in human populations.

Authors:  M Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Estimation of effective half life of clearance of radioactive Iodine (I) in patients treated for hyperthyroidism and carcinoma thyroid.

Authors:  R Ravichandran; Jp Binukumar; Amal Al Saadi
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.