Literature DB >> 30504742

Author`s Reply.

Ahmet Arnaz1, Şenol Pişkin.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30504742      PMCID: PMC6287442     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol        ISSN: 2149-2263            Impact factor:   1.596


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, We thank the author for their interest in our studies and results and for bringing up this point. As the author has mentioned, shunt operations are challenging procedures in congenital patients because it is difficult, if not impossible, to predict short- and long-terms performance in specific patients (1-3). Thus, patient-specific surgical planning and decision making for shunt configuration (location, diameter, and type) are crucial for the success of surgery (3-6). In our study (7), we have investigated in detail the performance of shunt configurations in terms of pulmonary flow rates, energy (pressure) loss, and blood damage (hemolysis). Moreover, we have studied the effect of pulmonary artery diameter and pulmonary vascular resistance on pulmonary flow rates. Tables 2 and 6 present the right, left, and total pulmonary artery perfusion calculations. In the “Flow splits” subsection of the Results section, flow preference has been discussed on the basis of shunt configuration, pulmonary artery diameters, and pulmonary vascular resistance. In the Discussion section, flow preferences have been discussed on the basis of pulmonary resistance, shunt anastomosis angle, and pulmonary artery sizes. Furthermore, in the Conclusion section, we have suggested that the anastomosis angle between the shunt and pulmonary artery has a crucial effect on flow splits directed to the pulmonary arteries. The shunt angle should not be directed toward the narrow pulmonary artery (right or left) since total pulmonary flow rates decrease. Furthermore, vertical anastomosis configurations increase total pulmonary perfusion; thus, these configurations are preferable compared with leaned anastomosis shunt configurations. We, hereby, thank again the author for their fruitful discussions. They have summarized shunt surgery planning based on previous literature and our current paper. They have also emphasized the importance of the topic and remarked the place of our current paper among the surgical planning literature.
  7 in total

1.  Computational Modeling of Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Bypass Hemodynamics With Full Circle of Willis Anatomy.

Authors:  Senol Piskin; Akif Ündar; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.094

2.  Modified Blalock Taussig shunt: a not-so-simple palliative procedure.

Authors:  Verena Dirks; René Prêtre; Walter Knirsch; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel; Burkhardt Seifert; Martin Schweiger; Michael Hübler; Hitendu Dave
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Rapid growth of pulmonary artery after intrapulmonary artery septation.

Authors:  Kota Agematsu; Toru Okamura; Yoji Takiguchi; Fumiya Yoneyama; Yorikazu Harada
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2018-06-07

4.  Hemodynamics of patient-specific aorta-pulmonary shunt configurations.

Authors:  Senol Piskin; H Firat Altin; Okan Yildiz; Ihsan Bakir; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Tetralogy of Fallot Surgical Repair: Shunt Configurations, Ductus Arteriosus and the Circle of Willis.

Authors:  Senol Piskin; Gozde Unal; Ahmet Arnaz; Tayyar Sarioglu; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.495

6.  Effect of modified Blalock-Taussig shunt anastomosis angle and pulmonary artery diameter on pulmonary flow.

Authors:  Ahmet Arnaz; Şenol Pişkin; Gökçe Nur Oğuz; Yusuf Yalçınbaş; Kerem Pekkan; Tayyar Sarıoğlu
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Computational Pre-surgical Planning of Arterial Patch Reconstruction: Parametric Limits and In Vitro Validation.

Authors:  S Samaneh Lashkarinia; Senol Piskin; Tijen A Bozkaya; Ece Salihoglu; Can Yerebakan; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.934

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.