Literature DB >> 30504462

Should Pass/Fail Grading Be Used Instead of Traditional Letter Grades in Dental Education? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Pass/Fail Grading Improves Learning Experiences for Students and Viewpoint 2: Traditional Letter Grading Provides Objective Evaluation for Dental Education.

Bruno C Jham1, Dolores Cannella2, Shawn Adibi2, Kim Austin2, Veeratrishul Allareddy2, Cynthia S Petrie2.   

Abstract

Discussions about which grading system (letter grade or pass/fail) is more effective in dental education have been occurring for several decades. As more institutions continue to consider the change from the traditional five-tier letter grading system (A/B/C/D/F) to a two-tier grading system (pass/fail), this debate will likely continue. This point/counterpoint article examines arguments for and against each type of grading system, taking into consideration academic performance, learning outcomes, psychological well-being, learning environment, acceptance/performance in postgraduate educational programs, and student motivation. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that a pass/fail system improves learning experiences for dental students, whereas Viewpoint 2 argues that the traditional letter grading system provides for more objectivity and reliability in student evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  academic performance; assessment; dental education; dental students; educational measurement; grading; well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30504462     DOI: 10.21815/JDE.018.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  1 in total

1.  Use of a Knowledge-Based Governance Approach to Plan a Post-COVID-19 Predoctoral Dental.

Authors:  Natasha M Flake; Daniel C N Chan; Arthur C DiMarco; Bruce D Silverstein
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.