| Literature DB >> 30504462 |
Bruno C Jham1, Dolores Cannella2, Shawn Adibi2, Kim Austin2, Veeratrishul Allareddy2, Cynthia S Petrie2.
Abstract
Discussions about which grading system (letter grade or pass/fail) is more effective in dental education have been occurring for several decades. As more institutions continue to consider the change from the traditional five-tier letter grading system (A/B/C/D/F) to a two-tier grading system (pass/fail), this debate will likely continue. This point/counterpoint article examines arguments for and against each type of grading system, taking into consideration academic performance, learning outcomes, psychological well-being, learning environment, acceptance/performance in postgraduate educational programs, and student motivation. Viewpoint 1 supports the position that a pass/fail system improves learning experiences for dental students, whereas Viewpoint 2 argues that the traditional letter grading system provides for more objectivity and reliability in student evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: academic performance; assessment; dental education; dental students; educational measurement; grading; well-being
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30504462 DOI: 10.21815/JDE.018.131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Educ ISSN: 0022-0337 Impact factor: 2.264