Literature DB >> 30503760

Measuring Quality in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: What, How, and Why?

Mary Kathryn Abel1, Kimberly A Kho2, Andrew Walter3, Eve Zaritsky4.   

Abstract

In healthcare, the goal of maximizing value by improving the quality of care and lowering costs has been notoriously challenging to achieve. The fee-for-service model in gynecology and other fields has historically promoted the reduction of nonsurgical or minimally invasive approaches in favor of complex, often morbid procedures. In this review, we seek to define quality and value in the healthcare field and describe strategies that promote quality over production. We then discuss national, non-specialty-based efforts in the context of Surgical Care Improvement Project measures to improve quality of care. Finally, we present a case study through the Kaiser Permanente Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Initiative, one such model that successfully built on the quality metrics of the foregoing strategies to improve patient care.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecologic surgery; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; Quality improvement; Quality measures; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30503760     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.

Authors:  Vlad I Tica; Andrei A Tica; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Racial Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications Within an Integrated Health Care System.

Authors:  Eve Zaritsky; Anthonia Ojo; Lue-Yen Tucker; Tina R Raine-Bennett
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.